ALAB
Price
$232.68
Change
+$4.04 (+1.77%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
39.88B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
AMBA
Price
$81.16
Change
+$0.12 (+0.15%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.55B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALAB vs AMBA

Header iconALAB vs AMBA Comparison
Open Charts ALAB vs AMBABanner chart's image
ALAB vs AMBA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Astera Labs (ALAB) vs. Ambarella (AMBA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ALAB boasts a market cap of approximately $37 billion, dwarfing AMBA's $3.3 billion, reflecting stronger investor confidence in its AI infrastructure focus.
  • ALAB delivered Q1 2026 revenue growth of 93% year-over-year to $308 million, driving YTD gains of nearly 30% and 1-year returns exceeding 199%.
  • AMBA reported fiscal 2026 revenue of $391 million (up 37% YoY) but remains unprofitable with negative EPS, alongside modest YTD performance of about 5%.
  • Both stocks operate in AI semiconductors—ALAB in cloud connectivity, AMBA in edge AI—but ALAB shows superior recent momentum from hyperscaler demand.
  • ALAB's beta of 3.36 indicates higher volatility than AMBA's 2.16, appealing to growth-oriented traders amid sector rotations.
  • Relative performance highlights ALAB's outperformance in recent market activity, fueled by earnings beats and product launches.

Introduction

Astera Labs (ALAB) and Ambarella (AMBA) represent key players in the semiconductor space, focusing on AI-driven solutions. ALAB specializes in connectivity for cloud and AI infrastructure, while AMBA targets edge AI processors for applications like automotive and security. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid surging AI demand. Traders seeking exposure to AI infrastructure growth and investors tracking relative performance in semiconductors will find insights into momentum, risks, and sector trends valuable for portfolio decisions.

ALAB Overview and Recent Performance

Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) is a fabless semiconductor company headquartered in San Jose, California, designing connectivity solutions—including PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express), CXL (Compute Express Link), and Ethernet products—to address data, networking, and memory bottlenecks in cloud and AI infrastructure. Serving hyperscalers and OEMs (original equipment manufacturers), it benefits from rack-scale AI deployments.

In recent market activity, ALAB stock has surged, with shares trading around $216 after a 7% daily gain, within a 52-week range of $63 to $263. Year-to-date returns stand at about 30%, with 1-year gains over 199%, driven by Q1 2026 results showing $308 million in revenue (93% YoY growth) and EPS of $0.61, beating estimates. Sentiment has strengthened on strong guidance, a new Scorpio X-Series switch launch for AI networking, and AI infrastructure tailwinds, though high valuation and competition temper enthusiasm.

AMBA Overview and Recent Performance

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) develops low-power system-on-a-chip (SoC) semiconductors and software for edge AI applications, including video processing for security, advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), cabin monitoring, and robotics. Operating from Santa Clara, California, it targets automotive, IoT (Internet of Things), and industrial markets.

AMBA shares recently closed near $74, up 5% in a session, with a 52-week range of $48 to $97. The stock has posted 1-month gains around 40% but flat YTD performance near 5% and 1-year returns of 48%. Fiscal 2026 revenue reached $391 million (37% YoY growth), with Q4 at $101 million, but ongoing losses (EPS -$1.78 TTM) reflect R&D investments in edge AI. Upcoming Q1 FY2027 earnings on May 28 add anticipation, with sentiment supported by AI vision design wins yet pressured by profitability concerns and sector competition.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from a total of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—from momentum and sector rotation to volatility plays—suited to current market conditions like AI infrastructure booms and semiconductor volatility. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7, with examples in semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AMD) yielding 83% annualized gains at 68% win rates. Virtual Agents offer risk management on customizable balances, while Signal Agents provide real-time alerts. Explore these high-conviction bots to enhance trading precision in dynamic environments.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ALAB and AMBA both leverage AI but diverge in focus: ALAB's cloud-scale connectivity contrasts AMBA's edge devices, exposing ALAB to hyperscaler capex cycles and AMBA to automotive/IoT adoption. Growth drivers favor ALAB's 93% quarterly surge versus AMBA's steadier 37% annual pace.

Recent momentum tilts to ALAB with 72% 1-month gains and profitability (P/E 145), while AMBA trades at a negative P/E amid losses. Risk factors include ALAB's elevated beta (3.36) signaling volatility from AI hype, versus AMBA's 2.16 beta and design-win dependencies. Both share semiconductor exposure, but ALAB enjoys hotter cloud sentiment over AMBA's edge maturation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors ALAB due to its trend consistency, recent earnings catalysts like 93% revenue growth, and superior relative positioning in high-demand AI connectivity. AMBA offers edge AI potential but lags in profitability and momentum. Probabilistic edge to ALAB amid ongoing infrastructure builds, though volatility warrants monitoring.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
ALAB vs. AMBA commentary
May 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALAB is a Hold and AMBA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 17, 2026
Stock price -- (ALAB: $232.68 vs. AMBA: $81.16)
Brand notoriety: ALAB: Not notable vs. AMBA: Notable
ALAB represents the Semiconductors, while AMBA is part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 111% vs. AMBA: 102%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $39.88B vs. AMBA: $3.55B
ALAB [@Semiconductors] is valued at $39.88B. AMBA’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $3.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.46T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $617.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $143.81B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $52.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAMBA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AMBA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALAB is a better buy in the long-term than AMBA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMBA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • AMBA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALAB is a better buy in the short-term than AMBA.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а +16.46% price change this week, while AMBA (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +6.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.10%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +140.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

AMBA is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+4.47% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.97% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALAB($39.9B) has a higher market cap than AMBA($3.55B). ALAB YTD gains are higher at: 39.865 vs. AMBA (14.568). ALAB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 233M vs. AMBA (-56.94M). ALAB has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. AMBA (313M). ALAB has less debt than AMBA: ALAB (4.15M) vs AMBA (13.4M). ALAB has higher revenues than AMBA: ALAB (1B) vs AMBA (391M).
ALABAMBAALAB / AMBA
Capitalization39.9B3.55B1,123%
EBITDA233M-56.94M-409%
Gain YTD39.86514.568274%
P/E Ratio157.22N/A-
Revenue1B391M256%
Total Cash1.18B313M378%
Total Debt4.15M13.4M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBA: Fundamental Ratings
AMBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABAMBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
AMBA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JIASX9.82-0.05
-0.51%
JHancock Multi-Asset High Income R6
LBDRX22.06-0.22
-0.99%
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
OIERX26.55-0.29
-1.08%
JPMorgan Equity Income R5
DLCFX17.13-0.20
-1.15%
Destinations Large Cap Equity I
FAOFX19.77-0.33
-1.64%
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been loosely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
+1.77%
CRDO - ALAB
58%
Loosely correlated
-6.70%
VECO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
AMBA - ALAB
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
LRCX - ALAB
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.82%
KLIC - ALAB
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
More

AMBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBA has been closely correlated with ADI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMBA jumps, then ADI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBA
1D Price
Change %
AMBA100%
+0.15%
ADI - AMBA
68%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
RMBS - AMBA
68%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
NXPI - AMBA
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
MTSI - AMBA
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
SLAB - AMBA
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
More