ALAB
Price
$350.62
Change
-$11.16 (-3.08%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
60.1B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
AMBA
Price
$68.88
Change
-$4.02 (-5.51%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALAB vs AMBA

ALAB vs AMBA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Astera Labs (ALAB) vs. Ambarella (AMBA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Astera Labs (ALAB) reported Q1 2026 revenue of $308 million, reflecting 93% year-over-year growth, significantly outpacing Ambarella (AMBA)’s more moderate revenue expansion in its most recent quarter.
  • ALAB’s market capitalization substantially exceeds AMBA’s, underscoring greater scale and investor positioning in AI infrastructure connectivity solutions.
  • Recent market activity shows ALAB experiencing volatility following strong earnings, while AMBA saw a notable surge after receiving a “top pick” analyst rating in late June 2026.
  • Both companies operate in the AI semiconductor sector, but ALAB focuses on cloud-scale connectivity such as PCIe solutions, whereas AMBA emphasizes edge AI applications in automotive and IoT.
  • ALAB demonstrates stronger recent momentum tied to hyperscaler demand, whereas AMBA benefits from automotive AI revenue records and profitability improvements.
  • Sector exposure and relative performance highlight trade-offs between ALAB’s high-growth profile and AMBA’s steadier edge-device focus amid broader semiconductor market conditions.

Introduction

Astera Labs (ALAB) and Ambarella (AMBA) are both publicly traded companies in the semiconductor industry with exposure to artificial intelligence applications. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and market positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating relative opportunities in AI-related equities. The analysis draws on observable performance metrics, earnings developments, and sector trends from recent weeks, providing a factual framework for those monitoring high-growth technology stocks or seeking contrasts within the semiconductor space.

ALAB Overview and Recent Performance

Astera Labs (ALAB) develops semiconductor-based connectivity solutions for rack-scale AI infrastructure, including high-speed interfaces such as PCIe Gen 6. In recent market activity, the company reported Q1 2026 revenue of $308 million, a 93% year-over-year increase driven by demand for AI data center components. Shares have shown notable volatility amid broader semiconductor sector movements, with strong year-to-date gains reflecting investor interest in its growth trajectory. Upcoming Q2 2026 results, scheduled for release after market close on August 4, 2026, represent a key near-term catalyst. Sentiment has been influenced by positive earnings momentum offset by periodic pullbacks tied to market-wide pressures.

AMBA Overview and Recent Performance

Ambarella (AMBA) designs AI system-on-chip solutions primarily for edge applications in automotive, security, and consumer devices. Recent market activity includes record automotive AI revenue contributing to improved profitability, alongside an analyst upgrade that positioned the stock as a top pick for the second half of 2026. Shares experienced a significant single-session gain following that rating in late June. Performance has been steadier compared with larger peers, supported by expanding AI adoption in vehicles, though subject to typical sector fluctuations and occasional insider transactions. Broader time references indicate ongoing interest in its edge AI positioning.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron operates a platform featuring hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across various strategies and timeframes. Only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions are featured in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, performance statistics, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore diverse automated approaches. The section provides transparent metrics to help traders evaluate options aligned with current conditions. Explore the Trending AI Robots page for additional details on available strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In business model terms, Astera Labs (ALAB) targets cloud and data-center connectivity for large-scale AI deployments, exposing it to hyperscaler capital expenditure cycles, while Ambarella (AMBA) concentrates on edge AI processors for automotive and IoT uses, offering different growth drivers tied to vehicle electrification and smart devices. Recent momentum favors ALAB’s higher revenue growth rate, contrasted with AMBA’s demonstrated profitability turnaround and specific analyst endorsements. Risk factors include ALAB’s larger valuation multiple amid potential volatility and AMBA’s smaller scale with exposure to automotive sector cycles. Market sentiment reflects stronger recent inflows toward ALAB’s infrastructure narrative, balanced against AMBA’s niche positioning in physical AI applications. Sector exposure overlaps in semiconductors but diverges in end-market focus, creating distinct trade-offs for investors assessing relative performance and positioning.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings catalysts, and relative market positioning, Tickeron’s AI currently assigns a probabilistic preference to Astera Labs (ALAB) over Ambarella (AMBA). Stronger recent revenue growth and alignment with high-demand AI infrastructure trends support this assessment, though both stocks carry volatility typical of the semiconductor sector and warrant ongoing monitoring of catalysts and stability metrics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ALAB vs. AMBA commentary
Jul 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALAB is a Hold and AMBA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2026
Stock price -- (ALAB: $350.62 vs. AMBA: $68.88)
Brand notoriety: ALAB: Not notable vs. AMBA: Notable
ALAB represents the Semiconductors, while AMBA is part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALAB: 30% vs. AMBA: 50%
Market capitalization -- ALAB: $60.1B vs. AMBA: $3.02B
ALAB [@Semiconductors] is valued at $60.1B. AMBA’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $3.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.15T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $680.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $204.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $71.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAMBA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AMBA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALAB is a better buy in the long-term than AMBA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALAB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMBA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALAB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • AMBA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMBA is a better buy in the short-term than ALAB.

Price Growth

ALAB (@Semiconductors) experienced а -10.82% price change this week, while AMBA (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -7.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.73%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALAB is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

AMBA is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-0.98% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Production Equipment (+1.70% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALAB($60.1B) has a higher market cap than AMBA($3.02B). ALAB YTD gains are higher at: 110.760 vs. AMBA (-2.767). ALAB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 233M vs. AMBA (-50.87M). ALAB has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. AMBA (278M). ALAB has less debt than AMBA: ALAB (4.15M) vs AMBA (13.3M). ALAB has higher revenues than AMBA: ALAB (1B) vs AMBA (405M).
ALABAMBAALAB / AMBA
Capitalization60.1B3.02B1,989%
EBITDA233M-50.87M-458%
Gain YTD110.760-2.767-4,003%
P/E Ratio236.91N/A-
Revenue1B405M247%
Total Cash1.18B278M426%
Total Debt4.15M13.3M31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMBA: Fundamental Ratings
AMBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALABAMBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
AMBA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOR46.480.72
+1.57%
Source Capital
LRGF76.610.32
+0.42%
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
IBIL24.890.05
+0.20%
ishares Ibonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF
DVOL37.12N/A
N/A
FirstTrustDorseyWrightMomt&LwVolatil ETF
GMUB51.21-0.04
-0.07%
Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF

ALAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALAB has been loosely correlated with CRDO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALAB jumps, then CRDO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALAB
1D Price
Change %
ALAB100%
-3.08%
CRDO - ALAB
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.00%
VECO - ALAB
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
AMBA - ALAB
54%
Loosely correlated
-5.51%
LRCX - ALAB
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.08%
KLIC - ALAB
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.43%
More

AMBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBA has been closely correlated with ADI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMBA jumps, then ADI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBA
1D Price
Change %
AMBA100%
-5.51%
ADI - AMBA
68%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
RMBS - AMBA
68%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
NXPI - AMBA
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
MTSI - AMBA
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.90%
SLAB - AMBA
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
More