ALB
Price
$117.52
Change
-$4.59 (-3.76%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
13.87B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNEY
Price
$0.54
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
4.43M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALB vs CNEY

ALB vs CNEY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALB vs. CNEY commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a Hold and CNEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALB($13.9B) has a higher market cap than CNEY($4.43M). ALB has higher P/E ratio than CNEY: ALB (435.26) vs CNEY (0.01). CNEY YTD gains are higher at: -11.765 vs. ALB (-16.212). ALB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 986M vs. CNEY (-11.1M). CNEY has less debt than ALB: CNEY (0) vs ALB (1.88B). ALB has higher revenues than CNEY: ALB (5.91B) vs CNEY (51M).
ALBCNEYALB / CNEY
Capitalization13.9B4.43M313,982%
EBITDA986M-11.1M-8,882%
Gain YTD-16.212-11.765138%
P/E Ratio435.260.018,120,508%
Revenue5.91B51M11,584%
Total CashN/A317K-
Total Debt1.88B0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALB: Fundamental Ratings
ALB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBCNEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (ALB: $117.52 vs. CNEY: $0.54)
Brand notoriety: ALB and CNEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALB: 108% vs. CNEY: 6%
Market capitalization -- ALB: $13.87B vs. CNEY: $4.43M
ALB [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $13.87B. CNEY’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $47 to $214.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $11.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CNEY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CNEY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALB is a better buy in the long-term than CNEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNEY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CNEY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALB is a better buy in the short-term than CNEY.

Price Growth

ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -6.62% price change this week, while CNEY (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALB is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.79% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

View a ticker or compare two or three
ALB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNEY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SWMR39.593.60
+10.00%
Swarmer Inc
TRNR3.050.11
+3.74%
Interactive Strength Inc.
TDTH1.680.03
+1.82%
Trident Digital Tech Holdings Ltd.
LUV39.240.55
+1.42%
Southwest Airlines Co
RSI26.430.07
+0.27%
Rush Street Interactive

ALB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALB has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALB jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALB
1D Price
Change %
ALB100%
-3.43%
SQM - ALB
79%
Closely correlated
-3.60%
OLN - ALB
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
HUN - ALB
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
FUL - ALB
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
DOW - ALB
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
More

CNEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNEY and ESI have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNEY and ESI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNEY
1D Price
Change %
CNEY100%
-0.28%
ESI - CNEY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
KRO - CNEY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
ALB - CNEY
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
BCPC - CNEY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
WTTR - CNEY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
More