ALV
Price
$119.01
Change
+$2.37 (+2.03%)
Updated
Jun 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.73B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GT
Price
$6.34
Change
+$0.44 (+7.46%)
Updated
Jun 24, 03:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.7B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALV vs GT

ALV vs GT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALV vs. GT commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Hold and GT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ALV: $116.64 vs. GT: $5.90)
Brand notoriety: ALV: Not notable vs. GT: Notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 91% vs. GT: 86%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $8.73B vs. GT: $1.7B
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.73B. GT’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $1.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $72.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the short-term than GT.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -4.35% price change this week, while GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -6.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.

GT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.43% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALV($8.73B) has a higher market cap than GT($1.7B). ALV has higher P/E ratio than GT: ALV (12.74) vs GT (4.69). ALV YTD gains are higher at: -0.222 vs. GT (-32.648). ALV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. GT (995M). GT has more cash in the bank: 723M vs. ALV (342M). ALV has less debt than GT: ALV (2.25B) vs GT (8.03B). GT has higher revenues than ALV: GT (17.9B) vs ALV (11B).
ALVGTALV / GT
Capitalization8.73B1.7B515%
EBITDA1.48B995M149%
Gain YTD-0.222-32.6481%
P/E Ratio12.744.69272%
Revenue11B17.9B61%
Total Cash342M723M47%
Total Debt2.25B8.03B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV vs GT: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
GT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6523
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66100
SMR RATING
1..100
3499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALV's Valuation (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (45) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's SMR Rating (34) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (99) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (63) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (99) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZTEN50.470.07
+0.14%
F/M 10-Yr Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
DUSA55.66-0.10
-0.18%
Davis Select US Equity ETF
FDLS41.40-0.44
-1.04%
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
CERY33.72-0.41
-1.20%
State StreetSPDRBbgEnhRlYldCmdStrNoK1ETF
SOLT28.52-3.42
-10.71%
2X Solana ETF

GT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GT
1D Price
Change %
GT100%
-1.17%
LEA - GT
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
MNRO - GT
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
FOXF - GT
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.17%
MGA - GT
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
GPC - GT
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
More