Advertisement
ALV vs THRM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Autoliv Inc. (ALV) vs. Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Autoliv Inc. (ALV) has demonstrated stronger recent momentum, rising about 15% in the past month, outpacing Gentherm Incorporated (THRM)'s roughly 7% gain.
- ALV trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 13.08 compared to THRM's 50.29, suggesting better relative valuation.
- Year-to-date (YTD), THRM leads with 18% gains versus ALV's 3%, reflecting differing sensitivities to automotive sector trends.
- Both stocks operate in the auto parts industry but focus on distinct areas: ALV on passive safety systems and THRM on thermal management and comfort technologies.
- ALV's larger market capitalization of $9.1 billion provides greater scale compared to THRM's $909 million.
- Analyst sentiment remains positive for both, with recent price target adjustments signaling confidence in their market positioning.
Introduction
Autoliv Inc. (ALV) and Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) are key players in the auto parts sector, focusing on safety and comfort innovations amid evolving automotive demands like electrification and advanced driver-assistance systems. This comparison highlights their recent relative performance, business models, and market dynamics, aiding traders seeking short-term momentum plays and investors eyeing long-term growth in the consumer cyclical space. With both stocks sensitive to global vehicle production trends and supply chain shifts, understanding their contrasts helps in portfolio diversification or sector rotation strategies.
ALV Overview and Recent Performance
Autoliv Inc. (ALV), headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden, develops and supplies passive safety systems such as airbags, seatbelts, and steering wheels to major automakers worldwide. In recent market activity, ALV has shown robust gains, climbing around 15% over the past month and nearly 39% over the last year, driven by positive analyst updates including a raised price target to $150. Sentiment has benefited from steady demand for safety features in vehicles and resilience in the automotive supply chain, despite broader sector volatility. Trading near $121 with a market cap exceeding $9 billion, ALV reflects improved positioning relative to peers.
THRM Overview and Recent Performance
Gentherm Incorporated (THRM), based in Northville, Michigan, specializes in thermal management technologies, including climate-controlled seats and battery solutions for automotive and medical applications. Recent weeks have seen moderate advances, with shares up about 7% in the past month and 25% over the year, supported by analyst buy ratings and a price target around $37-$41. Performance reflects exposure to electric vehicle (EV) thermal needs and medical segment growth, though tempered by higher valuations. At roughly $30 per share and a $909 million market cap, THRM maintains outperformance on a YTD basis at 18%.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI-powered trading bots curated from over 351 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and volatility plays, featuring impressive stats such as annualized returns from 15% to 168%, win rates of 54% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. With risk controls including stop-losses of 2-10% and take-profits of 2-3%, they cater to various timeframes from one day to two months. Traders can explore these high-performing options tailored to current market conditions for potential edge in dynamic environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Autoliv (ALV) and Gentherm (THRM) share auto parts sector exposure but diverge in focus: ALV emphasizes essential safety components with broader global scale, while THRM targets niche thermal comfort and EV-related tech plus medical diversification. Growth drivers for ALV include steady OEM demand, contrasting THRM's reliance on premium features amid EV adoption. Recent momentum favors ALV, but THRM shows higher YTD gains. Risk factors involve cyclical auto production for both, with ALV's size offering stability versus THRM's elevated P/E signaling growth premiums. Market sentiment leans positive, with analysts highlighting catalysts like supply chain normalization.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors ALV due to its superior recent trend consistency, lower valuation multiples, and stronger monthly momentum amid favorable analyst revisions. While THRM offers YTD outperformance and EV exposure, ALV's scale and relative stability position it better for near-term probabilistic upside in the auto sector.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Hold and THRM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTHRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ALV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- THRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THRM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- THRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -5.92% price change this week, while THRM (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
ALV is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.
THRM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.24% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| ALV | THRM | ALV / THRM | |
| Capitalization | 8.86B | 1.08B | 819% |
| EBITDA | 1.48B | 109M | 1,356% |
| Gain YTD | 1.232 | -2.969 | -41% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.74 | 48.34 | 26% |
| Revenue | 11B | 1.54B | 715% |
| Total Cash | 342M | 177M | 193% |
| Total Debt | 2.25B | 273M | 825% |
ALV | THRM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALV's Valuation (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THRM (65). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than THRM’s over the last 12 months.
ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THRM (100). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than THRM’s over the last 12 months.
ALV's SMR Rating (34) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THRM (89). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than THRM’s over the last 12 months.
THRM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as ALV (49). This means that THRM’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.
THRM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALV (52). This means that THRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALV’s over the last 12 months.
| ALV | THRM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 60% | 8 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
ALV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with THRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then THRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALV | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| THRM - ALV | 67% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| APTV - ALV | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| ADNT - ALV | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| PHIN - ALV | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| ALSN - ALV | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
More | ||||
THRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THRM has been closely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if THRM jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To THRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THRM | 100% | -1.78% | ||
| ALV - THRM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| LEA - THRM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| APTV - THRM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| GNTX - THRM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| MGA - THRM | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||