AM
Price
$22.75
Change
-$0.26 (-1.13%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.81B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KMI
Price
$32.86
Change
+$0.09 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
73.11B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AM vs KMI

AM vs KMI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Antero Midstream (AM) vs. Kinder Morgan (KMI) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Antero Midstream (AM) focuses on natural gas gathering and processing in the Appalachian Basin, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) operates a broader network of pipelines and terminals across multiple energy commodities.
  • Recent market activity shows AM delivering consistent volume growth and returning capital to shareholders through dividends and buybacks amid stable energy demand.
  • KMI maintains a diversified midstream portfolio with emphasis on fee-based revenues, supporting steady cash flows and a long track record of dividend payments.
  • Both stocks operate in the energy infrastructure sector, where regulatory, commodity price, and infrastructure expansion factors influence relative performance.
  • Sentiment for AM has been supported by acquisition activity and operational efficiency, whereas KMI benefits from its scale and established asset base.
  • Comparative positioning highlights trade-offs between AM’s regional concentration and growth potential versus KMI’s broader diversification and stability profile.

Introduction

Investors and traders often compare Antero Midstream (AM) and Kinder Morgan (KMI) to evaluate opportunities within the midstream energy sector. These companies provide essential infrastructure for transporting and processing energy resources, making their stocks relevant for those seeking exposure to stable cash flows, dividends, and infrastructure assets. The comparison helps assess differences in business focus, operational scale, and market positioning amid evolving energy markets. Portfolio managers, income-oriented investors, and sector specialists may find this analysis useful for understanding relative strengths in the current environment.

AM Overview and Recent Performance

Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) provides midstream services including gathering, compression, and processing primarily for natural gas and liquids from the Appalachian Basin. In recent weeks, the company announced its second-quarter 2026 earnings release date and a quarterly dividend of $0.225 per share, continuing a streak of consistent distributions. Stock performance has reflected volume growth from operational assets and contributions from prior acquisitions, with shares trading near recent highs amid broader energy infrastructure interest. Key influences include stable production from upstream partners and capital return initiatives such as share repurchases. Market sentiment has remained constructive on efficiency gains and free cash flow generation.

KMI Overview and Recent Performance

Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) owns and operates an extensive network of pipelines, terminals, and storage facilities handling natural gas, crude oil, and refined products across North America. Recent market activity has featured steady fee-based revenue streams supporting dividend continuity and balance sheet management. The stock has shown resilience tied to infrastructure utilization rates and expansion projects in key basins. Influences on performance include regulatory developments affecting energy transport and overall commodity transport volumes. Sentiment reflects the company’s scale advantages and long-standing focus on predictable cash flows in the midstream space.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to current market conditions. Only those demonstrating strong suitability based on backtested results, win rates, and risk-adjusted returns earn placement in the trending section. Available statistics often include ranges such as average monthly returns between 5-15% or higher for top bots, drawdown metrics under 10-20%, and success rates exceeding 60-70% in favorable setups, though individual outcomes vary widely by strategy and market environment. All AI trading bots feature distinct trading styles, statistics, and ticker sets. Review the Trending AI Robots page for detailed options and performance data.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Antero Midstream (AM) and Kinder Morgan (KMI) both deliver midstream infrastructure services but differ in scope and exposure. AM maintains a concentrated presence in Appalachian natural gas gathering and processing, offering potential upside from regional production growth yet carrying higher concentration risk. KMI’s diversified pipeline and terminal network spans multiple commodities and geographies, providing broader stability through fee-based contracts less sensitive to single-basin fluctuations. Recent momentum for AM has centered on volume increases and capital returns, while KMI emphasizes consistent dividend payouts and infrastructure expansion. Risk factors include regulatory hurdles for both, with AM additionally exposed to upstream partner activity and KMI to broader energy transport demand shifts. Sector exposure places both in energy infrastructure, where market sentiment favors reliable cash generation over commodity price volatility.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in volumes, dividend stability, and relative positioning within the midstream sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to Kinder Morgan (KMI). Its diversified asset base and established fee structure appear to support more consistent performance metrics compared with Antero Midstream (AM)’s regional focus, though outcomes remain dependent on evolving market and operational conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AM vs. KMI commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AM is a Buy and KMI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (AM: $22.75 vs. KMI: $32.86)
Brand notoriety: AM and KMI are both notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AM: 72% vs. KMI: 96%
Market capitalization -- AM: $10.81B vs. KMI: $73.11B
AM [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $10.81B. KMI’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $73.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $124.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKMI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • KMI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, AM is a better buy in the long-term than KMI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMI’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KMI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMI is a better buy in the short-term than AM.

Price Growth

AM (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while KMI (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +1.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

AM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

KMI is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.18% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMI($73.1B) has a higher market cap than AM($10.8B). AM has higher P/E ratio than KMI: AM (26.45) vs KMI (21.20). AM YTD gains are higher at: 30.779 vs. KMI (21.806). KMI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.5B vs. AM (970M). KMI has more cash in the bank: 72M vs. AM (0). AM has less debt than KMI: AM (3.71B) vs KMI (31.9B). KMI has higher revenues than AM: KMI (17.5B) vs AM (1.29B).
AMKMIAM / KMI
Capitalization10.8B73.1B15%
EBITDA970M7.5B13%
Gain YTD30.77921.806141%
P/E Ratio26.4521.20125%
Revenue1.29B17.5B7%
Total Cash072M-
Total Debt3.71B31.9B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AM vs KMI: Fundamental Ratings
AM
KMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2225
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
4570
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4232
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2555
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AM's Valuation (18) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as KMI (20). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to KMI’s over the last 12 months.

AM's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as KMI (7). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to KMI’s over the last 12 months.

AM's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as KMI (70). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to KMI’s over the last 12 months.

KMI's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as AM (42). This means that KMI’s stock grew similarly to AM’s over the last 12 months.

AM's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as KMI (55). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to KMI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMKMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHAK57.101.11
+1.98%
Shake Shack
MNOV1.320.01
+0.76%
Medicinova
MBINL24.800.09
+0.36%
Merchants Bancorp
ALGN167.01-1.22
-0.73%
Align Technology
IDR28.38-0.42
-1.46%
Idaho Strategic Resources

AM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AM has been loosely correlated with DTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AM jumps, then DTM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AM
1D Price
Change %
AM100%
-1.13%
DTM - AM
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
WMB - AM
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
KMI - AM
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
TRGP - AM
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
DKL - AM
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
More