AM
Price
$22.75
Change
-$0.26 (-1.13%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.81B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OKE
Price
$93.17
Change
-$0.06 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
58.69B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AM vs OKE

AM vs OKE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Antero Midstream (AM) vs. ONEOK (OKE) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Antero Midstream is a pure-play midstream provider focused on the Appalachian Basin, offering a high dividend yield supported by long-term, fee-based contracts with Antero Resources.
  • ONEOK is a diversified midstream giant with operations spanning natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and crude oil across multiple basins, including recent expansion into the Permian and Rockies.
  • AM has demonstrated strong relative price resilience in recent weeks, outperforming OKE amid a midstream sector rotation driven by yield-seeking investors.
  • OKE offers greater scale, geographic diversification, and liquidity, while AM provides concentrated exposure to the natural gas-rich Marcellus/Utica region.
  • Recent market activity reflects diverging sentiment pathways: AM benefits from natural gas infrastructure demand, while OKE navigates post-acquisition integration of the Magellan and Medallion deals.
  • Both stocks exhibit favorable long-term contract structures, but their risk-reward profiles differ substantially in terms of diversification and capital return frameworks.

Introduction

The midstream energy sector has captured renewed investor attention as steady cash flows, fee-based revenue models, and attractive dividends offer a compelling alternative in a volatile macro environment. This comparison examines AM (Antero Midstream) and OKE (ONEOK, Inc.), two companies that occupy distinct positions along the midstream value chain. Whether you are a dividend-focused investor seeking yield stability or a growth-oriented trader evaluating infrastructure expansion themes, understanding the operational, financial, and sentiment-driven contrasts between these two names may sharpen your perspective. Below, we break down what has shaped each stock's recent trajectory and how they stack up side by side.

AM Overview and Recent Performance

AM, or Antero Midstream Corporation, operates as a midstream energy company primarily serving Antero Resources—one of the largest natural gas and NGL (natural gas liquids) producers in the Appalachian Basin. The company owns and operates gathering pipelines, compression stations, and water handling assets across the Marcellus and Utica shales. Its business model is anchored by long-term, fixed-fee contracts, which insulate revenues from short-term commodity price swings. In recent weeks, AM has benefited from robust natural gas production demand and investor rotation into high-yield midstream names. The stock's relative strength has been supported by its above-average dividend yield and a capital return framework that prioritizes shareholder distributions. Sentiment has been further buoyed by steady operational volumes and improved free cash flow generation, positioning AM favorably among small- to mid-cap midstream peers during a period of heightened market scrutiny on income-generating equities.

OKE Overview and Recent Performance

OKE, ONEOK, Inc., is one of the largest diversified midstream service providers in the United States, with an integrated network of natural gas and NGL pipelines, processing plants, and fractionation facilities spanning the Mid-Continent, Permian Basin, and Rocky Mountain regions. The company significantly expanded its footprint through the acquisitions of Magellan Midstream Partners and Medallion Midstream, adding crude oil and refined products transportation capabilities. In recent market activity, OKE has navigated a more complex sentiment landscape. While the company's scale and diversification are widely regarded as competitive advantages, integration costs and the broader market's cautious stance on post-acquisition execution have introduced near-term uncertainty. Nonetheless, OKE continues to generate substantial distributable cash flow, and its expanded asset base provides exposure to multiple hydrocarbon value chains. The stock's recent price behavior reflects this duality—long-term strategic strength tempered by short-term integration and leverage considerations.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like AM and OKE, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to shifting market conditions. With hundreds of bots trading thousands of different tickers, Tickeron identifies only the most statistically relevant performers for inclusion in this section. These bots employ diverse strategies—from short-term momentum and swing trading to longer-term trend-following approaches—and each comes with transparent performance statistics, including win rates, trade frequency, and historical drawdowns. Some bots have achieved win rates exceeding 70%, while others specialize in volatile or range-bound market regimes. Whether you are evaluating midstream energy stocks or exploring entirely different sectors, the Trending AI Robots provide a real-time lens into which automated strategies are currently thriving.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, AM and OKE present a study in trade-offs. Antero Midstream offers concentrated, high-yield exposure to Appalachian natural gas infrastructure with a leaner operational footprint and a direct tie to Antero Resources' production growth. This concentration can be a double-edged sword: it amplifies upside when basin activity thrives but introduces single-counterparty and single-basin risk. ONEOK, by contrast, operates across multiple hydrocarbon commodities and geographies, reducing reliance on any one producer or region. Its post-acquisition portfolio now includes crude oil and refined products logistics, offering a broader revenue base.

On the growth front, AM's expansion is largely tied to upstream activity from its anchor tenant, while OKE's growth narrative revolves around integrating recent acquisitions and capitalizing on Permian Basin NGL export demand. In terms of market sentiment, AM has recently seen steadier upward momentum, while OKE has experienced more choppy price action as the market digests integration-related variables. Risk factors differ accordingly: AM faces basin-specific and counterparty concentration risks, whereas OKE contends with integration execution, higher absolute leverage, and commodity price sensitivity across a broader asset mix. Liquidity and institutional coverage also favor OKE, given its larger market capitalization and deeper trading volumes.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend patterns, relative price stability, and the current market preference for high-yield, simplified midstream structures, Tickeron's AI would likely express a near-term preference for AM over OKE. The AI framework tends to favor stocks demonstrating consistent directional momentum, cleaner technical setups, and fewer unresolved integration overhangs. AM's recent price behavior, supported by steady fundamentals and a straightforward capital return model, aligns more closely with these criteria. OKE remains a fundamentally stronger, more diversified enterprise over the long term, but its current technical profile and integration-related uncertainties introduce greater variability. This probabilistic assessment reflects the AI's tendency to prioritize trend consistency and near-term stability, and it should be understood as a quantitative observation rather than a definitive forecast.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
AM vs. OKE commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AM is a Buy and OKE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (AM: $22.75 vs. OKE: $93.23)
Brand notoriety: AM: Notable vs. OKE: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AM: 72% vs. OKE: 79%
Market capitalization -- AM: $10.81B vs. OKE: $58.69B
AM [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $10.81B. OKE’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $58.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $124.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOKE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OKE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AM is a better buy in the long-term than OKE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OKE’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OKE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AM and OKE are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AM (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while OKE (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

AM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

OKE is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.18% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OKE($58.7B) has a higher market cap than AM($10.8B). AM has higher P/E ratio than OKE: AM (26.45) vs OKE (16.61). AM (30.779) and OKE (30.122) have similar YTD gains . OKE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.92B vs. AM (970M). OKE has more cash in the bank: 172M vs. AM (0). AM has less debt than OKE: AM (3.71B) vs OKE (33.7B). OKE has higher revenues than AM: OKE (35.2B) vs AM (1.29B).
AMOKEAM / OKE
Capitalization10.8B58.7B18%
EBITDA970M7.92B12%
Gain YTD30.77930.122102%
P/E Ratio26.4516.61159%
Revenue1.29B35.2B4%
Total Cash0172M-
Total Debt3.71B33.7B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AM vs OKE: Fundamental Ratings
AM
OKE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2717
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
244
SMR RATING
1..100
4554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4224
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2242
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OKE's Valuation (16) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as AM (18). This means that OKE’s stock grew similarly to AM’s over the last 12 months.

AM's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OKE (44). This means that AM’s stock grew somewhat faster than OKE’s over the last 12 months.

AM's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as OKE (54). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to OKE’s over the last 12 months.

OKE's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as AM (42). This means that OKE’s stock grew similarly to AM’s over the last 12 months.

AM's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as OKE (42). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to OKE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMOKE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OKE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORIC10.890.14
+1.30%
Oric Pharmaceuticals
IEP7.71-0.05
-0.64%
Icahn Enterprises LP
SPOK10.51-0.14
-1.31%
Spok Holdings
QNCX18.28-0.26
-1.40%
Quince Therapeutics Inc.
AEM144.51-2.54
-1.73%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd

OKE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OKE has been closely correlated with TRGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OKE jumps, then TRGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OKE
1D Price
Change %
OKE100%
+1.61%
TRGP - OKE
73%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
PAA - OKE
71%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
KMI - OKE
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
AM - OKE
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
PAGP - OKE
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
More