AMAL
Price
$36.10
Change
+$0.80 (+2.27%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
732.23M
4 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$59.10
Change
+$0.64 (+1.09%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
4B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMAL vs HWC

Header iconAMAL vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts AMAL vs HWCBanner chart's image
Amalgamated Financial
Price$36.10
Change+$0.80 (+2.27%)
Volume$207.68K
Capitalization732.23M
Hancock Whitney
Price$59.10
Change+$0.64 (+1.09%)
Volume$976.98K
Capitalization4B
AMAL vs HWC Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMAL vs. HWC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a Hold and HWC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AMAL: $36.10 vs. HWC: $59.10)
Brand notoriety: AMAL and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 125% vs. HWC: 183%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $732.23M vs. HWC: $4B
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $732.23M. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMAL and HWC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the short-term than AMAL.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +11.21% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than AMAL($732M). HWC has higher P/E ratio than AMAL: HWC (9.98) vs AMAL (8.10). HWC (8.004) and AMAL (7.858) have similar YTD gains . HWC has more cash in the bank: 561M vs. AMAL (5.49M). AMAL has less debt than HWC: AMAL (336M) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than AMAL: HWC (1.37B) vs AMAL (286M).
AMALHWCAMAL / HWC
Capitalization732M4B18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.8588.00498%
P/E Ratio8.109.9881%
Revenue286M1.37B21%
Total Cash5.49M561M1%
Total Debt336M1.52B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1535
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2037
SMR RATING
1..100
1511
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3523
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (69) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (81). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (37). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (15). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (42). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (35). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLGIX16.810.17
+1.02%
Principal LargeCap Growth I Instl
ATVPX18.420.18
+0.99%
Alger 35 Z
GGEIX22.740.21
+0.93%
Nationwide Global Sust Eq R6
PQNAX26.040.18
+0.70%
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value A
LAVTX15.880.09
+0.57%
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R5

AMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAL
1D Price
Change %
AMAL100%
+2.27%
CTBI - AMAL
82%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
BHLB - AMAL
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
BY - AMAL
81%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
HWC - AMAL
81%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
FFBC - AMAL
81%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+1.09%
ASB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
FNB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
CADE - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
ABCB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
UBSI - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
More