AMAL
Price
$28.87
Change
-$0.20 (-0.69%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
869.25M
46 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$62.72
Change
-$0.81 (-1.27%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.32B
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMAL vs HWC

Header iconAMAL vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts AMAL vs HWCBanner chart's image
Amalgamated Financial
Price$28.87
Change-$0.20 (-0.69%)
Volume$124.07K
Capitalization869.25M
Hancock Whitney
Price$62.72
Change-$0.81 (-1.27%)
Volume$853.42K
Capitalization5.32B
AMAL vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMAL vs. HWC commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a StrongBuy and HWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AMAL: $28.87 vs. HWC: $62.72)
Brand notoriety: AMAL and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 71% vs. HWC: 114%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $869.25M vs. HWC: $5.32B
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $869.25M. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than AMAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMAL is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($5.32B) has a higher market cap than AMAL($869M). HWC has higher P/E ratio than AMAL: HWC (11.57) vs AMAL (8.64). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 17.375 vs. AMAL (-12.564). HWC has more cash in the bank: 513M vs. AMAL (4.2M). AMAL has less debt than HWC: AMAL (90.9M) vs HWC (849M). HWC has higher revenues than AMAL: HWC (1.47B) vs AMAL (321M).
AMALHWCAMAL / HWC
Capitalization869M5.32B16%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.56417.375-72%
P/E Ratio8.6411.5775%
Revenue321M1.47B22%
Total Cash4.2M513M1%
Total Debt90.9M849M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7257
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3121
SMR RATING
1..100
2012
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6457
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (57). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (31). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (20). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (59). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (64). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIEIX31.990.31
+0.98%
Principal Glb Emerging Markets Inst
LRSYX21.30N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value I
GGIDX13.16N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Global Infras Instl
VWNFX48.96-0.04
-0.08%
Vanguard Windsor™ II Inv
MFOCX32.61-0.22
-0.67%
Marsico Focus

AMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAL
1D Price
Change %
AMAL100%
-0.69%
ASB - AMAL
79%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
FULT - AMAL
79%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
BY - AMAL
79%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
SHBI - AMAL
79%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
HWC - AMAL
78%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-0.57%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
UCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
ONB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
FULT - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
More