Advertisement
AMBP vs AVY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBP is a Hold and AVY is a Hold.
| AMBP | AVY | AMBP / AVY | |
| Capitalization | 2.77B | 12.7B | 22% |
| EBITDA | 717M | 1.45B | 49% |
| Gain YTD | 20.986 | -6.198 | -339% |
| P/E Ratio | 92.60 | 18.35 | 505% |
| Revenue | 5.99B | 9.25B | 65% |
| Total Cash | 189M | 227M | 83% |
| Total Debt | 4.34B | 3.68B | 118% |
AVY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMBP | AVY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMBP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while AVY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMBP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- AVY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMBP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AVY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMBP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- AVY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMBP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -4.34% price change this week, while AVY (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMBP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
AVY is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Containers/Packaging (+0.31% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KBUF | 25.69 | 0.13 | +0.49% |
| KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2027 ETF (KBUF) | |||
| KNO | 62.19 | 0.07 | +0.11% |
| AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF (KNO) | |||
| BSCU | 16.32 | -0.04 | -0.24% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) | |||
| ABEQ | 38.49 | -0.10 | -0.25% |
| Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) | |||
| MFDX | 42.01 | -0.45 | -1.06% |
| PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) | |||
AMBP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBP has been loosely correlated with CCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBP jumps, then CCK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMBP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBP | 100% | -1.49% | ||
| CCK - AMBP | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| AMCR - AMBP | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| BALL - AMBP | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| AVY - AMBP | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| SLGN - AMBP | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||