Advertisement
AMCI vs PONO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCI is a Hold and PONO is a Hold.
AMCI | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMCI | PONO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 16% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 18% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 20% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 14% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 7% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 19% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 63% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 19% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMCI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PONO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMCI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PONO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMCI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PONO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMCI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PONO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AMCI (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +1.92% price change this week, while PONO (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.93%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.41%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (-0.39% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.84% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSCV | 29.52 | 0.29 | +1.00% |
| Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) | |||
| VIXM | 13.03 | 0.11 | +0.85% |
| ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) | |||
| FDEM | 35.60 | 0.06 | +0.17% |
| Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) | |||
| CGMS | 26.24 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) | |||
| MYCN | 23.13 | -0.05 | -0.21% |
| State Street My2034 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCN) | |||
AMCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMCI has been closely correlated with PONO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMCI jumps, then PONO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMCI | 100% | -3.92% | ||
| PONO - AMCI | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| PONOU - AMCI | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AGMH - AMCI | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.19% | ||
| CXAI - AMCI | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.33% | ||
| GPAC - AMCI | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||