AMN
Price
$33.63
Change
-$1.08 (-3.11%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMS
Price
$25.66
Change
-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
13.78B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMN vs FMS

AMN vs FMS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMN vs. FMS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a Hold and FMS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AMN: $33.63 vs. FMS: $25.66)
Brand notoriety: AMN and FMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMN: 74% vs. FMS: 74%
Market capitalization -- AMN: $1.3B vs. FMS: $13.78B
AMN [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $1.3B. FMS’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $13.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $87.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMN and FMS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the short-term than AMN.

Price Growth

AMN (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +2.25% price change this week, while FMS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +4.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

FMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+0.13% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($13.8B) has a higher market cap than AMN($1.3B). AMN has higher P/E ratio than FMS: AMN (18.07) vs FMS (13.69). AMN YTD gains are higher at: 113.388 vs. FMS (12.066). FMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.42B vs. AMN (202M). FMS has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. AMN (561M). AMN has less debt than FMS: AMN (777M) vs FMS (11B). FMS has higher revenues than AMN: FMS (19.4B) vs AMN (3.42B).
AMNFMSAMN / FMS
Capitalization1.3B13.8B9%
EBITDA202M3.42B6%
Gain YTD113.38812.066940%
P/E Ratio18.0713.69132%
Revenue3.42B19.4B18%
Total Cash561M1.62B35%
Total Debt777M11B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMN vs FMS: Fundamental Ratings
AMN
FMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8240
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9382
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1486
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMS's Valuation (2) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMN (71) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew significantly faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as AMN (100) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's SMR Rating (82) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as AMN (93) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

AMN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as FMS (42) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.

AMN's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Personnel Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMS (86) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew significantly faster than FMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMNFMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIGRX263.212.99
+1.15%
Vanguard Morn Growth Index Investor
IVGAX20.130.20
+1.00%
VY® Invesco Growth and Income A
ASILX15.230.07
+0.46%
AB Select US Long/Short I
TWHIX21.38-0.05
-0.23%
American Century Heritage Inv
ANTUX11.45-0.08
-0.69%
American Century Non-US IntrsVal Inv

AMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMN and USPH have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMN and USPH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMN
1D Price
Change %
AMN100%
-3.11%
USPH - AMN
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
NHC - AMN
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
ADUS - AMN
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
JYNT - AMN
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
INNV - AMN
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
More

FMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with DVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then DVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMS
1D Price
Change %
FMS100%
-0.16%
DVA - FMS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
CON - FMS
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
AMN - FMS
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
BTMD - FMS
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
INNV - FMS
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
More