AMN
Price
$34.46
Change
-$0.33 (-0.95%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMS
Price
$23.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.47B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMN vs FMS

AMN vs FMS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMN vs. FMS commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a Hold and FMS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (AMN: $34.46 vs. FMS: $23.43)
Brand notoriety: AMN and FMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMN: 86% vs. FMS: 120%
Market capitalization -- AMN: $1.33B vs. FMS: $12.47B
AMN [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $1.33B. FMS’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $12.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $92.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMN and FMS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMN is a better buy in the short-term than FMS.

Price Growth

AMN (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -0.12% price change this week, while FMS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

FMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.28% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($12.5B) has a higher market cap than AMN($1.34B). AMN has higher P/E ratio than FMS: AMN (12.81) vs FMS (12.09). AMN YTD gains are higher at: 118.655 vs. FMS (2.327). FMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.42B vs. AMN (202M). FMS has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. AMN (561M). AMN has less debt than FMS: AMN (777M) vs FMS (11B). FMS has higher revenues than AMN: FMS (19.4B) vs AMN (3.42B).
AMNFMSAMN / FMS
Capitalization1.34B12.5B11%
EBITDA202M3.42B6%
Gain YTD118.6552.3275,100%
P/E Ratio12.8112.09106%
Revenue3.42B19.4B18%
Total Cash561M1.62B35%
Total Debt777M11B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMN vs FMS: Fundamental Ratings
AMN
FMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1560
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9180
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5287
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMS's Valuation (2) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMN (69) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew significantly faster than AMN’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as AMN (100) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's SMR Rating (80) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as AMN (91) in the Personnel Services industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to AMN’s over the last 12 months.

AMN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Personnel Services industry is in the same range as FMS (57) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.

AMN's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Personnel Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMS (87) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that AMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMNFMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGAAX75.290.68
+0.91%
American Funds Growth Fd of Amer R-1
LOMAX19.210.14
+0.73%
Edgar Lomax Value
TLISX15.550.11
+0.71%
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq A
DCCRX33.540.15
+0.45%
Nomura Small Cap Core R
PRPCX5.44-0.05
-0.91%
PGIM Jennison Energy Infrastructure C

AMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMN and CON have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMN and CON's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMN
1D Price
Change %
AMN100%
-0.95%
CON - AMN
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
USPH - AMN
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
ADUS - AMN
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
JYNT - AMN
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
LFST - AMN
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
More

FMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMS and ADUS have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMS and ADUS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMS
1D Price
Change %
FMS100%
N/A
ADUS - FMS
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
DVA - FMS
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
CON - FMS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
ENSG - FMS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
AMN - FMS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More