AN
Price
$190.01
Change
+$1.71 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:01 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.3B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LAD
Price
$297.00
Change
+$1.84 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.73B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AN vs LAD

AN vs LAD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? AutoNation, Inc. (AN) vs. Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both AN and LAD are major automotive retailers facing sector challenges like softening demand, but LAD reports larger trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue of $37.63 billion versus AN's $27.63 billion.
  • LAD demonstrates stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at +12.93% compared to AN's +1.48%, reflecting divergent momentum.
  • Valuation metrics favor LAD with a lower trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 8.93 versus AN's 12.30, alongside a cheaper price-to-sales ratio.
  • AN shows higher return on equity (ROE) at 27.06% but carries elevated debt-to-equity at 436.91%, compared to LAD's 235.16%.
  • Recent market activity highlights upward price moves for AN shares alongside peers, while LAD contends with post-earnings declines.
  • Analyst price targets suggest potential upside for both, with LAD at an average of $364.60 versus current levels around $289.

Introduction

This stock comparison pits AN against LAD, two prominent players in the automotive retail sector. Both companies deal in new and used vehicles, parts, service, and finance amid a backdrop of elevated interest rates, shifting consumer preferences toward used cars, and normalizing inventory levels. Investors and traders focused on consumer discretionary stocks, value opportunities in cyclical industries, or relative performance in vehicle dealerships will find this analysis pertinent. By examining recent price behavior, financial metrics, and market sentiment, readers gain insights into positioning and trade-offs in the current environment.

AN Overview and Recent Performance

AutoNation, Inc. (AN) stands as one of the largest U.S. automotive retailers, operating over 250 dealerships primarily in Sunbelt markets across domestic, import, premium luxury, and finance segments. The company sells new and used vehicles, provides repair services, and offers financing and insurance products. In recent market activity, AN shares have traded within a 52-week range of $155.29 to $228.92, with a current price around $210 and market capitalization of approximately $7.3 billion. YTD returns stand at +1.48%, reflecting modest gains amid sector pressures. Recent weeks saw shares surge alongside peers like Penske Automotive, driven by positive industry outlooks and valuation reassessments following pullbacks. Sentiment has been influenced by new vehicle revenue trends, finance unit profitability, and broader auto sales normalization, with analysts maintaining equal-weight ratings and targets around $237.

LAD Overview and Recent Performance

Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) functions as a global automotive retailer spanning the U.S., U.K., and Canada, delivering vehicles, finance, insurance, and aftersales services through physical stores and digital channels. It emphasizes lifecycle vehicle ownership support. Shares have fluctuated in a 52-week range of $239.78 to $360.56, trading near $289 with a market cap of about $6.75 billion. YTD performance is stronger at +12.93%, outperforming the sector despite a roughly 16% drop since the last earnings report. Recent activity includes valuation checks amid share price volatility, with stable quarterly revenue growth contrasting earnings pressures. Key influences include acquisition-driven expansion, used vehicle dynamics, and interest rate sensitivity, as analysts hold neutral stances with an average target of $365.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots exhibit impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from +15.50% to +167.82%, win rates up to 87.72%, profit factors from 1.50 to 11.70, and trade durations spanning 1 day to 55 days. Styles vary from swing and trend-following to multi-agent systems targeting sectors like semiconductors, finance, and ETFs, with several boasting 70%+ win rates and high profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20. While none focus explicitly on auto retailers like AN or LAD, the platform’s versatile bots adapt to current conditions. Traders may explore these for pattern recognition and automated signals tailored to volatile markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AN and LAD share core business models centered on vehicle sales and services but diverge in scale and reach: LAD’s international presence and higher TTM revenue provide broader growth avenues via acquisitions, while AN focuses domestically with stronger ROE. Recent momentum favors LAD on YTD basis, though AN shows short-term resilience. Risk profiles highlight AN’s higher debt load versus LAD’s lower multiples (forward P/E 8.05 vs. 9.55). Both expose investors to auto sector headwinds like high rates and inventory shifts, but LAD’s positive revenue growth contrasts AN’s contraction. Market sentiment tilts toward value in LAD, balanced by AN’s operational efficiency.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor LAD in the current environment, owing to its superior YTD relative performance, lower valuation multiples like P/E and PEG ratios, and larger revenue base signaling scale advantages. Consistent trend positioning and higher analyst upside potential further support probabilistic outperformance, though AN’s stability and recent catalysts warrant monitoring for shifts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AN vs. LAD commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AN is a Buy and LAD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (AN: $188.30 vs. LAD: $295.15)
Brand notoriety: AN and LAD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AN: 97% vs. LAD: 111%
Market capitalization -- AN: $6.3B vs. LAD: $6.73B
AN [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $6.3B. LAD’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $6.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $47.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LAD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AN is a better buy in the long-term than LAD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LAD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AN is a better buy in the short-term than LAD.

Price Growth

AN (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -2.63% price change this week, while LAD (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -4.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

AN is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

LAD is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-1.89% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAD($6.73B) has a higher market cap than AN($6.3B). LAD (10.30) and AN (10.21) have similar P/E ratio . AN YTD gains are higher at: -8.805 vs. LAD (-10.830). LAD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.18B vs. AN (1.64B). LAD has more cash in the bank: 421M vs. AN (65.5M). AN has less debt than LAD: AN (10.5B) vs LAD (16.1B). LAD has higher revenues than AN: LAD (37.7B) vs AN (27.5B).
ANLADAN / LAD
Capitalization6.3B6.73B94%
EBITDA1.64B2.18B75%
Gain YTD-8.805-10.83081%
P/E Ratio10.2110.3099%
Revenue27.5B37.7B73%
Total Cash65.5M421M16%
Total Debt10.5B16.1B65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AN vs LAD: Fundamental Ratings
AN
LAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8439
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
30100
SMR RATING
1..100
3469
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAD's Valuation (43) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AN (68). This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAD (100). This means that AN’s stock grew significantly faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.

AN's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAD (69). This means that AN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AN (54). This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AN (65). This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANLAD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LAD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENA.X0.0909120.003998
+4.60%
Ethena cryptocurrency
BADGER.X0.3463860.007869
+2.32%
Badger DAO cryptocurrency
MTL.X0.242323-0.001489
-0.61%
Metal DAO cryptocurrency
GMX.X5.783145-0.044425
-0.76%
GMX cryptocurrency
VGX.X0.000039-0.000009
-17.92%
VGX Token cryptocurrency

AN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AN has been closely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AN jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AN
1D Price
Change %
AN100%
-0.23%
PAG - AN
79%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
ABG - AN
77%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
GPI - AN
77%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
LAD - AN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
SAH - AN
71%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More

LAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAD has been closely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAD jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAD
1D Price
Change %
LAD100%
+0.10%
ABG - LAD
72%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
AN - LAD
72%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
PAG - LAD
69%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
GPI - LAD
67%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
RUSHB - LAD
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
More