This stock comparison pits AN against LAD, two prominent players in the automotive retail sector. Both companies deal in new and used vehicles, parts, service, and finance amid a backdrop of elevated interest rates, shifting consumer preferences toward used cars, and normalizing inventory levels. Investors and traders focused on consumer discretionary stocks, value opportunities in cyclical industries, or relative performance in vehicle dealerships will find this analysis pertinent. By examining recent price behavior, financial metrics, and market sentiment, readers gain insights into positioning and trade-offs in the current environment.
AutoNation, Inc. (AN) stands as one of the largest U.S. automotive retailers, operating over 250 dealerships primarily in Sunbelt markets across domestic, import, premium luxury, and finance segments. The company sells new and used vehicles, provides repair services, and offers financing and insurance products. In recent market activity, AN shares have traded within a 52-week range of $155.29 to $228.92, with a current price around $210 and market capitalization of approximately $7.3 billion. YTD returns stand at +1.48%, reflecting modest gains amid sector pressures. Recent weeks saw shares surge alongside peers like Penske Automotive, driven by positive industry outlooks and valuation reassessments following pullbacks. Sentiment has been influenced by new vehicle revenue trends, finance unit profitability, and broader auto sales normalization, with analysts maintaining equal-weight ratings and targets around $237.
Lithia Motors, Inc. (LAD) functions as a global automotive retailer spanning the U.S., U.K., and Canada, delivering vehicles, finance, insurance, and aftersales services through physical stores and digital channels. It emphasizes lifecycle vehicle ownership support. Shares have fluctuated in a 52-week range of $239.78 to $360.56, trading near $289 with a market cap of about $6.75 billion. YTD performance is stronger at +12.93%, outperforming the sector despite a roughly 16% drop since the last earnings report. Recent activity includes valuation checks amid share price volatility, with stable quarterly revenue growth contrasting earnings pressures. Key influences include acquisition-driven expansion, used vehicle dynamics, and interest rate sensitivity, as analysts hold neutral stances with an average target of $365.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots exhibit impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from +15.50% to +167.82%, win rates up to 87.72%, profit factors from 1.50 to 11.70, and trade durations spanning 1 day to 55 days. Styles vary from swing and trend-following to multi-agent systems targeting sectors like semiconductors, finance, and ETFs, with several boasting 70%+ win rates and high profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20. While none focus explicitly on auto retailers like AN or LAD, the platform’s versatile bots adapt to current conditions. Traders may explore these for pattern recognition and automated signals tailored to volatile markets.
AN and LAD share core business models centered on vehicle sales and services but diverge in scale and reach: LAD’s international presence and higher TTM revenue provide broader growth avenues via acquisitions, while AN focuses domestically with stronger ROE. Recent momentum favors LAD on YTD basis, though AN shows short-term resilience. Risk profiles highlight AN’s higher debt load versus LAD’s lower multiples (forward P/E 8.05 vs. 9.55). Both expose investors to auto sector headwinds like high rates and inventory shifts, but LAD’s positive revenue growth contrasts AN’s contraction. Market sentiment tilts toward value in LAD, balanced by AN’s operational efficiency.
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor LAD in the current environment, owing to its superior YTD relative performance, lower valuation multiples like P/E and PEG ratios, and larger revenue base signaling scale advantages. Consistent trend positioning and higher analyst upside potential further support probabilistic outperformance, though AN’s stability and recent catalysts warrant monitoring for shifts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AN (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -2.63% price change this week, while LAD (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -4.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.08%.
AN is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
LAD is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| AN | LAD | AN / LAD | |
| Capitalization | 6.3B | 6.73B | 94% |
| EBITDA | 1.64B | 2.18B | 75% |
| Gain YTD | -8.805 | -10.830 | 81% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.21 | 10.30 | 99% |
| Revenue | 27.5B | 37.7B | 73% |
| Total Cash | 65.5M | 421M | 16% |
| Total Debt | 10.5B | 16.1B | 65% |
AN | LAD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LAD's Valuation (43) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AN (68). This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.
AN's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for LAD (100). This means that AN’s stock grew significantly faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.
AN's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAD (69). This means that AN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.
LAD's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AN (54). This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.
LAD's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as AN (65). This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.
| AN | LAD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 61% | 8 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 61% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ENA.X | 0.090912 | 0.003998 | +4.60% |
| Ethena cryptocurrency | |||
| BADGER.X | 0.346386 | 0.007869 | +2.32% |
| Badger DAO cryptocurrency | |||
| MTL.X | 0.242323 | -0.001489 | -0.61% |
| Metal DAO cryptocurrency | |||
| GMX.X | 5.783145 | -0.044425 | -0.76% |
| GMX cryptocurrency | |||
| VGX.X | 0.000039 | -0.000009 | -17.92% |
| VGX Token cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AN has been closely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AN jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAD has been closely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAD jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.