GPI
Price
$286.77
Change
-$9.94 (-3.35%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
3.42B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LAD
Price
$385.42
Change
-$19.61 (-4.84%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
8.47B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPI vs LAD

GPI vs LAD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Group 1 Automotive (GPI) vs. Lithia Motors (LAD) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Group 1 Automotive (GPI) and Lithia Motors (LAD) are two of the largest publicly traded automotive retailers in the U.S., both aggressively consolidating a fragmented dealership industry through acquisitions and share buybacks.
  • LAD generated record full-year 2025 revenue of $37.63 billion, roughly 1.7x the $22.6 billion reported by GPI, reflecting Lithia's significantly larger global footprint across nearly 500 stores in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K.
  • Both companies missed Wall Street estimates in their most recent quarter, with GPI posting adjusted EPS of $8.49 (vs. $9.36 consensus) and LAD reporting adjusted EPS of $6.74 (vs. $8.10 consensus), highlighting industry-wide margin compression in new-vehicle sales.
  • GPI repurchased approximately 10.1% of its outstanding shares in 2025, while LAD repurchased 11.4%, signaling strong capital-discipline conviction from both management teams amid discounted valuations.
  • LAD's captive finance arm, Driveway Finance Corporation, is scaling rapidly with a 15% penetration rate and an average FICO score of 751, offering a differentiated earnings stream absent from GPI's business model.
  • GPI carries a lower beta of 0.83 versus LAD's 1.26, potentially appealing to investors seeking lower relative volatility in the automotive retail sector.

Introduction

The automotive retail sector sits at the intersection of consumer cyclical trends, interest-rate policy, and ongoing industry consolidation. For investors weighing exposure to this space, GPI (Group 1 Automotive) and LAD (Lithia Motors, operating as Lithia & Driveway) represent two of the most prominent publicly traded dealership groups. Both companies have used aggressive acquisition strategies and massive share-repurchase programs to drive per-share value, yet they differ meaningfully in scale, geographic diversification, and ancillary business lines. This comparison examines how these two automotive retailers stack up across key dimensions including recent performance, growth strategy, risk exposure, and market positioning — offering a balanced reference point for traders and investors evaluating relative opportunity in the sector.

GPI Overview and Recent Performance

Group 1 Automotive, headquartered in Houston, Texas, operates 254 dealerships across the United States and the United Kingdom, offering 36 vehicle brands. The company is a Fortune 250 enterprise with a diversified revenue mix spanning new-vehicle sales, used-vehicle retail, parts and service (P&S), and finance and insurance (F&I). In full-year 2025, GPI posted record revenues of $22.6 billion — a 13.2% increase year over year — and record gross profits of $3.6 billion, driven in large part by a standout 15.9% increase in parts and service gross profit, which reached $1.6 billion. Adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS) from continuing operations rose 3.8% to $40.71.

Despite the full-year records, recent quarters have shown headwinds. In the fourth quarter, GPI reported adjusted EPS of $8.49, falling short of consensus estimates, as new-vehicle gross profit per unit (PRU) compressed roughly 7% and same-store SG&A (selling, general and administrative expenses) as a percentage of gross profit increased. The company also absorbed $192.8 million in non-cash asset impairment charges for the full year, primarily tied to its U.S. reporting unit. On the restructuring front, GPI has been reshaping its U.K. operations — cutting 537 roles, closing underperforming locations, and exploring an exit from the Jaguar Land Rover franchise — while simultaneously acquiring high-performing luxury dealerships including Lexus, Acura, and Mercedes-Benz stores in key U.S. markets. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near the $337 level, well below its 52-week high of approximately $488, with a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of approximately 12.6.

LAD Overview and Recent Performance

Lithia Motors, branded as Lithia & Driveway, is the largest global automotive retailer by revenue. Headquartered in Medford, Oregon, the company operates nearly 500 stores across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, offering close to 60 vehicle brands. Its platform also includes Driveway Finance Corporation (DFC), a captive financing operation that provides an additional earnings stream distinct from traditional dealership activities. For full-year 2025, LAD reported record revenues of $37.63 billion — a 4.0% increase — and grew adjusted diluted EPS by 15.7% to $33.46. Full-year net income reached $825.9 million.

The fourth quarter of 2025, however, reflected margin pressures familiar across the industry. Adjusted EPS of $6.74 fell roughly 16.8% below analyst estimates, and same-store sales were nearly flat. New-vehicle gross profit per unit declined 8.9% year over year, though this was partially offset by a 9.8% increase in same-store aftersales gross profit and a 6.1% rise in used-vehicle revenue on a same-store basis. A key differentiator for LAD is its DFC unit, which delivered record quarterly income of $23 million in Q4 and achieved a 15% penetration rate with an average FICO score of 751 — indicating strong credit quality. The company also repurchased $947 million of shares in 2025 (11.4% of outstanding shares) and completed strategic acquisitions totaling $2.4 billion in annualized revenue. As of recent trading, LAD shares were around $345, near the upper portion of their 52-week range of approximately $240 to $361, with a trailing P/E of roughly 11.9.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page provides a curated overview of the most promising AI-powered trading bots available on the platform. With hundreds of AI trading bots actively trading thousands of different tickers across multiple timeframes and strategies, Tickeron identifies and showcases only those bots that demonstrate the strongest alignment with current market conditions. These robots span diverse trading styles — from swing trading and trend following to deep technical analysis and breakout strategies — and operate across 5-minute, 15-minute, and 60-minute intervals. Performance metrics vary widely: top-performing bots have generated annualized returns exceeding 75% to 100%, with win rates ranging from approximately 55% to over 67% and profit factors (the ratio of gross profit to gross loss) climbing as high as 4.53 in select strategies. Each robot trades a defined set of tickers with transparent, real-time trade logs. For traders and investors seeking data-driven decision support, exploring the Trending AI Robots page offers a practical starting point to evaluate which AI-driven strategies may warrant deeper investigation.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Scale and Revenue Base: LAD operates at roughly 1.7x the revenue scale of GPI, with $37.63 billion versus $22.6 billion in full-year 2025 revenue. This scale provides LAD with greater negotiating leverage with manufacturers and deeper geographic diversification — spanning the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. — while GPI concentrates its footprint in the U.S. and U.K. only.

Business Model Diversification: A critical differentiator is LAD's Driveway Finance Corporation, which adds a captive lending income stream that is still scaling. GPI relies more purely on the traditional dealership model — new and used vehicle sales, P&S, and F&I — which performed well in 2025 but shows less structural insulation from vehicle-margin cycles.

Profitability and Margin Trajectory: Both companies are experiencing similar margin headwinds. GPI's net profit margin compressed from 2.4% to 1.4% year over year (partly due to impairment charges), while LAD's net profit margin held relatively steady at approximately 2.2% to 2.3%. However, LAD's Q4 operating income declined 17.1% year over year, compared with a more modest decline in GPI's underlying U.S. operations before impairment effects.

Capital Allocation: Both management teams have demonstrated aggressive commitment to share repurchases. LAD bought back 11.4% of shares outstanding in 2025 ($947 million), slightly ahead of GPI's 10.1% ($555 million). Both also pay dividends, with yields near 0.66%–0.67%.

Risk Profile: GPI faces concentrated U.K. restructuring risk, having taken $28.4 million in U.K. charges in 2025 with more actions expected in 2026. LAD carries higher financial leverage and a beta of 1.26 versus GPI's 0.83, implying greater sensitivity to broad market moves. For investors concerned about near-term tariff and trade policy uncertainty affecting vehicle pricing and supply chains, GPI's lower beta may offer comparatively moderate drawdown risk.

Valuation: On a trailing P/E basis, LAD trades at approximately 11.9x versus GPI's 12.6x, suggesting a modest valuation discount for the larger retailer. Forward P/E ratios for GPI are notably lower at approximately 8.1x compared to LAD's 9.8x, which may reflect differing consensus earnings-growth expectations.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, stability of earnings streams, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely lean toward LAD as the more probabilistically favored name under current conditions — though the margin of preference is narrow. LAD's larger scale, broader geographic diversification, and the incremental earnings contribution from its captive finance unit (DFC) offer a more varied set of return drivers that can partially offset cyclical pressure in new-vehicle margins. The company's 15.7% adjusted EPS growth in 2025 and its same-store aftersales strength provide measurable evidence of operational resilience. That said, GPI presents its own compelling profile: a lower beta, aggressive buyback activity, and a deeply discounted forward P/E that could appeal to value-oriented AI models scanning for mean-reversion candidates. In practice, the relative ranking between these two names may shift depending on whether the AI emphasizes trend momentum, where LAD currently shows stronger price recovery from lows, or valuation, where GPI screens more attractively. Investors are encouraged to consider how each stock's characteristics align with their own risk tolerance and market outlook.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GPI vs. LAD commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPI is a Buy and LAD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (GPI: $286.77 vs. LAD: $385.42)
Brand notoriety: GPI and LAD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPI: 197% vs. LAD: 163%
Market capitalization -- GPI: $3.42B vs. LAD: $8.47B
GPI [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $3.42B. LAD’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $8.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $68.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $5.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GPI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LAD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPI is a better buy in the long-term than LAD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LAD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAD is a better buy in the short-term than GPI.

Price Growth

GPI (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -13.33% price change this week, while LAD (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +13.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

GPI is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

LAD is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.31% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAD($8.47B) has a higher market cap than GPI($3.42B). LAD has higher P/E ratio than GPI: LAD (12.76) vs GPI (11.86). LAD YTD gains are higher at: 16.442 vs. GPI (-26.836). LAD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.21B vs. GPI (818M). LAD has more cash in the bank: 364M vs. GPI (164M). GPI has less debt than LAD: GPI (5.78B) vs LAD (16.6B). LAD has higher revenues than GPI: LAD (37.9B) vs GPI (22.2B).
GPILADGPI / LAD
Capitalization3.42B8.47B40%
EBITDA818M2.21B37%
Gain YTD-26.83616.442-163%
P/E Ratio11.8612.7693%
Revenue22.2B37.9B59%
Total Cash164M364M45%
Total Debt5.78B16.6B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPI vs LAD: Fundamental Ratings
GPI
LAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3145
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6283
SMR RATING
1..100
7570
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4618
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPI's Valuation (19) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAD (57). This means that GPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as LAD (83). This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's SMR Rating (70) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as GPI (75). This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to GPI’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as GPI (63). This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to GPI’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as GPI (46). This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to GPI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPILAD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LAD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDU58.892.31
+4.08%
New Oriental Education and Technology Group
NOA13.600.13
+0.97%
North American Construction Group Ltd
SRTS2.910.02
+0.69%
Sensus Healthcare
BPOPM25.11N/A
N/A
Popular
TYRA31.88-1.18
-3.57%
Tyra Biosciences

GPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPI has been closely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GPI jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPI
1D Price
Change %
GPI100%
-3.35%
ABG - GPI
78%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
AN - GPI
77%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
SAH - GPI
72%
Closely correlated
-8.73%
LAD - GPI
66%
Loosely correlated
-4.84%
PAG - GPI
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
More