Advertisement
APG vs LMB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APG is a Buy and LMB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLMB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- APG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LMB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LMB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
APG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -3.27% price change this week, while LMB (@Building Products) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.56%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
APG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
LMB is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.00% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
@Building Products (-0.50% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| APG | LMB | APG / LMB | |
| Capitalization | 17.8B | 966M | 1,843% |
| EBITDA | 902M | 63.1M | 1,429% |
| Gain YTD | 7.554 | 4.110 | 184% |
| P/E Ratio | 125.36 | 29.84 | 420% |
| Revenue | 8.17B | 653M | 1,252% |
| Total Cash | 645M | 15.8M | 4,082% |
| Total Debt | 3.07B | 76.5M | 4,013% |
APG | LMB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LMB's Valuation (77) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as APG (88) in the null industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LMB (54) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that APG’s stock grew somewhat faster than LMB’s over the last 12 months.
LMB's SMR Rating (47) in the Miscellaneous industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APG (94) in the null industry. This means that LMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as LMB (56) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to LMB’s over the last 12 months.
APG's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LMB (88) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that APG’s stock grew significantly faster than LMB’s over the last 12 months.
| APG | LMB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
APG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APG has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APG jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APG | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| FIX - APG | 52% Loosely correlated | -8.10% | ||
| IESC - APG | 52% Loosely correlated | -6.74% | ||
| MTZ - APG | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| STRL - APG | 47% Loosely correlated | -8.75% | ||
| BLD - APG | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||
LMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMB has been loosely correlated with TTEK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMB jumps, then TTEK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMB | 100% | -1.05% | ||
| TTEK - LMB | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| PRIM - LMB | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| J - LMB | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| ACM - LMB | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| APG - LMB | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||