APO
Price
$125.92
Change
+$1.99 (+1.61%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
63.9B
20 days until earnings call
HPH
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.28B
Ad is loading...

APO vs HPH

Header iconAPO vs HPH Comparison
Open Charts APO vs HPHBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$125.92
Change+$1.99 (+1.61%)
Volume$6.26M
Capitalization63.9B
Highest Performances Holdings
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$260.71K
Capitalization2.28B
APO vs HPH Comparison Chart
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. HPH commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Buy and HPH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $125.92 vs. HPH: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: APO and HPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 134% vs. HPH: 57%
Market capitalization -- APO: $63.9B vs. HPH: $2.28B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $63.9B. HPH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHPH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HPH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than HPH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HPH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both APO and HPH are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +15.86% price change this week, while HPH (@Investment Managers) price change was -35.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.84% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($63.9B) has a higher market cap than HPH($2.28B). APO YTD gains are higher at: -23.542 vs. HPH (-79.642).
APOHPHAPO / HPH
Capitalization63.9B2.28B2,801%
EBITDA6.65BN/A-
Gain YTD-23.542-79.64230%
P/E Ratio13.58N/A-
Revenue32.6BN/A-
Total Cash170BN/A-
Total Debt8.09BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO vs HPH: Fundamental Ratings
APO
HPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
40100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5998
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APO's Valuation (34) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HPH (53) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to HPH’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for HPH (100) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew significantly faster than HPH’s over the last 12 months.

APO's SMR Rating (40) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPH (100) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPH’s over the last 12 months.

APO's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPH (98) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPH’s over the last 12 months.

APO's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for HPH (100) in the null industry. This means that APO’s stock grew significantly faster than HPH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOHPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWGFX4.11N/A
N/A
Wedgewood Retail
PJFAX51.39N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Growth A
IIVAX23.19N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value A
LADYX23.36N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Developing Growth I
RMBKX41.27N/A
N/A
RMB Mendon Financial Services A

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
+1.61%
KKR - APO
84%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
OWL - APO
80%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
TPG - APO
78%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
CG - APO
75%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
ARES - APO
75%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
More

HPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HPH and PTMN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HPH and PTMN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HPH
1D Price
Change %
HPH100%
-10.14%
PTMN - HPH
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
DHIL - HPH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
CRBG - HPH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
GAIN - HPH
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.33%
APO - HPH
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
More