ARKK
Price
$88.23
Change
+$1.31 (+1.51%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
6.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
COWG
Price
$39.43
Change
+$0.04 (+0.10%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
2.28B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARKK vs COWG

ARKK vs COWG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 02, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) vs. Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG)

Key Takeaways

  • ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) is an actively managed thematic fund focused on disruptive innovation, while Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) follows a rules-based index emphasizing high free cash flow (FCF) margins among large-cap growth stocks.
  • ARKK typically holds 40-55 securities with concentrated exposure to innovation themes such as genomics, artificial intelligence, and autonomous technology; COWG holds approximately 100 holdings selected for above-average FCF margins and momentum weighting.
  • Expense ratios differ materially: ARKK charges 0.75%, while COWG charges 0.49%, giving COWG a structural cost advantage.
  • Sector allocations overlap in technology and healthcare, yet ARKK exhibits greater active risk through thematic concentration, whereas COWG maintains broader diversification within a growth-oriented large-cap universe.
  • Both ETFs target growth-oriented investors seeking exposure to innovation and high-quality earnings, but they employ fundamentally different strategies—one discretionary and thematic, the other systematic and cash-flow driven.
  • Liquidity profiles support institutional and retail use for both, with ARKK benefiting from longer operating history since 2014 and COWG offering quarterly rebalancing since its 2022 inception.

Introduction

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) represent two distinct approaches to growth-oriented equity exposure. ARKK pursues long-term capital appreciation through active selection of companies tied to disruptive innovation themes. COWG tracks an index that screens for large-capitalization U.S. companies with superior free cash flow margins and applies momentum-based weighting. These ETFs do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they offer alternative pathways for investors seeking innovation and growth characteristics, differentiated by active versus rules-based methodologies and varying cost and concentration profiles.

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) Overview

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in 2014 that seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in domestic and foreign equity securities relevant to the theme of disruptive innovation. The fund defines disruptive innovation as technologically enabled new products or services that potentially change the way the world works, spanning areas such as genomics, autonomous technology, artificial intelligence, and next-generation internet applications. It typically maintains 40-55 holdings, with notable concentration in top positions that can exceed 50% of assets in the largest ten names. Prominent holdings have included Tesla Inc. (TSLA), Tempus AI Inc. (TEM), CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP), and various fintech and software companies. Sector allocations emphasize technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary areas. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As a non-diversified, actively managed vehicle, ARKK employs discretionary rebalancing driven by the manager’s research process rather than a fixed index methodology.

Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) Overview

Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) is a passively managed fund launched in December 2022 that seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. The index applies a rules-based methodology to identify approximately 100 large-capitalization U.S. companies from the Russell 1000 universe that demonstrate above-average free cash flow margins, then weights constituents using a momentum framework. Top holdings commonly feature companies such as Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM), Western Digital Corp. (WDC), Lam Research Corp. (LRCX), and Astera Labs Inc. (ALAB). Sector exposure concentrates in information technology, often exceeding 50%, with additional allocations to healthcare, communication services, and energy. The expense ratio is 0.49%. The fund rebalances quarterly, providing systematic adjustments based on the index rules while maintaining at least 80% exposure to large-capitalization U.S. equities.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader technology and growth equity landscape, where innovation in artificial intelligence, semiconductor advancements, and biotechnology continues to drive capital allocation. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, corporate capital spending on digital infrastructure, and regulatory developments around data privacy and emerging technologies influence sector dynamics. Capital flows into high-quality growth names with strong free cash flow characteristics have remained resilient across recent market cycles, while thematic bets on disruptive platforms have experienced greater sensitivity to valuation shifts and earnings delivery. Risks include concentration in a limited number of sectors, potential for elevated volatility in innovation-driven names, and competition for investor attention among growth strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ARKK has exhibited higher volatility consistent with its active thematic approach and concentrated bets on emerging innovation themes. COWG has demonstrated positioning centered on companies with robust free cash flow generation, which can provide relative stability during periods of sector rotation or earnings pressure. Relative performance has reflected differences in holdings turnover and sensitivity to mega-cap concentration; COWG’s methodology tends to limit exposure to the largest names, while ARKK can maintain significant positions in high-conviction holdings. Both have participated in broader technology and healthcare rallies, yet their distinct construction leads to differentiated behavior during shifts in growth leadership or macroeconomic sentiment.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs such as ARKK or COWG may find the tool useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, rules-based selection emphasizing free cash flow margins, and quarterly rebalancing discipline, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and systematic diversification within growth equities. ARKK retains appeal for those seeking active thematic exposure to disruptive innovation, though its higher cost and concentration introduce additional variables. This assessment reflects comparative characteristics rather than forward-looking performance guarantees.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ARKK vs. COWG commentary
Sep 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARKK is a Buy and COWG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARKK has more net assets: 6.4B vs. COWG (2.28B). ARKK has a higher annual dividend yield than COWG: ARKK (14.704) vs COWG (12.658). ARKK was incepted earlier than COWG: ARKK (12 years) vs COWG (4 years). COWG (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than ARKK (0.75). COWG has a higher turnover ARKK (43.00) vs ARKK (43.00).
ARKKCOWGARKK / COWG
Gain YTD14.70412.658116%
Net Assets6.4B2.28B281%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.49153%
Turnover43.00110.0039%
Yield0.000.35-
Fund Existence12 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARKKCOWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
ARKK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
COWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RJDI28.970.12
+0.41%
RJ Eagle GCM Dividend Select Income ETF (RJDI)
LDDR75.59N/A
N/A
Stone Ridge Trust Stone Ridge 2035 Term Income ETF
HTRB32.72-0.12
-0.38%
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB)
BINT32.63-0.13
-0.40%
Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT)
UX28.38-0.44
-1.53%
Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX)

ARKK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARKK has been closely correlated with ACHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARKK jumps, then ACHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARKK
1D Price
Change %
ARKK100%
+1.51%
ACHR - ARKK
68%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
SE - ARKK
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
FIRY - ARKK
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
DDD - ARKK
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
DNA - ARKK
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
More

COWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COWG
1D Price
Change %
COWG100%
+0.10%
LRCX - COWG
71%
Closely correlated
+6.98%
TXN - COWG
69%
Closely correlated
+3.29%
KLAC - COWG
68%
Closely correlated
+4.74%
AMAT - COWG
67%
Closely correlated
+6.51%
LSCC - COWG
66%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
More