Advertisement
COWG vs LSCC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a StrongBuy and LSCC is a Hold.
LSCC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COWG | LSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BAR | 40.64 | 0.28 | +0.69% |
| GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) | |||
| DGZ | 5.50 | N/A | N/A |
| DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) | |||
| HYZD | 22.37 | -0.04 | -0.18% |
| WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) | |||
| RXL | 58.34 | -0.45 | -0.76% |
| ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) | |||
| AMAU | 15.17 | -0.66 | -4.17% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long AMAT Daily ETF (AMAU) | |||
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 70% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 67% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| AMAT - COWG | 67% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| LSCC - COWG | 66% Closely correlated | -4.59% | ||
| RMBS - COWG | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.70% | ||
More | ||||
LSCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSCC has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSCC jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSCC | 100% | -4.59% | ||
| KLIC - LSCC | 76% Closely correlated | -4.24% | ||
| ENTG - LSCC | 73% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| KLAC - LSCC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| MPWR - LSCC | 71% Closely correlated | -3.94% | ||
| ALGM - LSCC | 71% Closely correlated | -2.05% | ||
More | ||||