ARL
Price
$16.35
Change
-$0.43 (-2.56%)
Updated
Oct 2, 02:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
257.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRPH
Price
$20.29
Change
-$0.20 (-0.98%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
404.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARL vs FRPH

ARL vs FRPH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARL vs. FRPH commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARL is a Buy and FRPH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARL vs FRPH: Fundamental Ratings
ARL
FRPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
8990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5472
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
771
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
20n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ARL's Valuation (88) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (100). This means that ARL’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

ARL's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (100). This means that ARL’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

ARL's SMR Rating (89) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (90). This means that ARL’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

ARL's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (72). This means that ARL’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for ARL (77). This means that FRPH’s stock grew significantly faster than ARL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARLFRPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ARL: $16.20 vs. FRPH: $20.49)
Brand notoriety: ARL and FRPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARL: 25% vs. FRPH: 90%
Market capitalization -- ARL: $257.46M vs. FRPH: $404.89M
ARL [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $257.46M. FRPH’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $404.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $487 to $63.76B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $2.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while FRPH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRPH is a better buy in the long-term than ARL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRPH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ARL is a better buy in the short-term than FRPH.

Price Growth

ARL (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +2.92% price change this week, while FRPH (@Real Estate Development) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-2.77% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
ARL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRPH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIPE28.710.39
+1.37%
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
DGRW97.420.18
+0.19%
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW)
PBOT34.81N/A
N/A
Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT)
VTG72.17-0.07
-0.10%
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG)
FNGO157.54-0.87
-0.55%
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETNs (FNGO)

ARL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARL and LHAI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARL and LHAI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARL
1D Price
Change %
ARL100%
N/A
LHAI - ARL
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
MMI - ARL
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
FRPH - ARL
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
AGNT - ARL
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.00%
STHO - ARL
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
More

FRPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRPH has been loosely correlated with MMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRPH jumps, then MMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRPH
1D Price
Change %
FRPH100%
-1.54%
MMI - FRPH
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
FSV - FRPH
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
RMR - FRPH
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
MLP - FRPH
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
DBRG - FRPH
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More