FRPH
Price
$22.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
425.34M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSV
Price
$140.70
Change
-$0.10 (-0.07%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.18B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRPH vs FSV

FRPH vs FSV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRPH vs. FSV commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRPH is a Buy and FSV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (FRPH: $22.14 vs. FSV: $140.80)
Brand notoriety: FRPH and FSV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRPH: 76% vs. FSV: 78%
Market capitalization -- FRPH: $425.34M vs. FSV: $6.18B
FRPH [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $425.34M. FSV’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $6.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $2.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRPH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRPH is a better buy in the long-term than FSV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRPH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRPH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRPH is a better buy in the short-term than FSV.

Price Growth

FRPH (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +4.43% price change this week, while FSV (@Real Estate Development) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSV is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.62% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSV($6.18B) has a higher market cap than FRPH($425M). FRPH has higher P/E ratio than FSV: FRPH (2215.50) vs FSV (39.89). FRPH YTD gains are higher at: -2.852 vs. FSV (-9.071). FSV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 543M vs. FRPH (15.2M). FSV has more cash in the bank: 173M vs. FRPH (97M). FRPH has less debt than FSV: FRPH (204M) vs FSV (1.56B). FSV has higher revenues than FRPH: FSV (5.6B) vs FRPH (43.1M).
FRPHFSVFRPH / FSV
Capitalization425M6.18B7%
EBITDA15.2M543M3%
Gain YTD-2.852-9.07131%
P/E Ratio2215.5039.895,554%
Revenue43.1M5.6B1%
Total Cash97M173M56%
Total Debt204M1.56B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRPH vs FSV: Fundamental Ratings
FRPH
FSV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5567
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9162
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
187
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSV's Valuation (83) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (100). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (100). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's SMR Rating (62) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (91). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

FSV's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (62). This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSV (87). This means that FRPH’s stock grew significantly faster than FSV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRPHFSV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRPH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGVGX32.200.19
+0.59%
American Funds Global Insight F-2
YAFFX24.79N/A
N/A
AMG Yacktman Focused N
JGETX14.05N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Equity R4
MLVHX19.18N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Equity I
TSPIX5.81N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Growth I2

FRPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRPH has been loosely correlated with MMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRPH jumps, then MMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRPH
1D Price
Change %
FRPH100%
-0.09%
MMI - FRPH
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
RMR - FRPH
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
MLP - FRPH
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
FSV - FRPH
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
STHO - FRPH
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More