Advertisement
ASAN vs FIG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASAN is a Buy and FIG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASAN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFIG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- ASAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FIG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASAN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FIG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ASAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а +13.71% price change this week, while FIG (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASAN is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.
FIG is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+3.86% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ASAN | FIG | ASAN / FIG | |
| Capitalization | 2.28B | 14B | 16% |
| EBITDA | -132.16M | -1.45B | 9% |
| Gain YTD | -28.009 | -29.489 | 95% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 809M | 1.16B | 70% |
| Total Cash | 425M | 1.65B | 26% |
| Total Debt | 248M | 56.2M | 441% |
ASAN | FIG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASAN's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as FIG (90). This means that ASAN’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.
FIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as ASAN (100). This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
FIG's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as ASAN (99). This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
ASAN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FIG (60). This means that ASAN’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.
ASAN's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FIG (100). This means that ASAN’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.
| ASAN | FIG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 31% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 24% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 29% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 77% | 10 days ago 37% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 40% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 33% |
Advertisement
ASAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASAN has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASAN jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAN | 100% | +9.79% | ||
| FRSH - ASAN | 75% Closely correlated | +8.89% | ||
| TEAM - ASAN | 74% Closely correlated | +6.92% | ||
| WDAY - ASAN | 74% Closely correlated | +17.78% | ||
| HUBS - ASAN | 70% Closely correlated | +14.46% | ||
| CRM - ASAN | 70% Closely correlated | +4.16% | ||
More | ||||
FIG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIG has been loosely correlated with ASAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIG jumps, then ASAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIG | 100% | +10.95% | ||
| ASAN - FIG | 54% Loosely correlated | +9.79% | ||
| CRM - FIG | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.16% | ||
| HUBS - FIG | 51% Loosely correlated | +14.46% | ||
| PCOR - FIG | 50% Loosely correlated | +7.23% | ||
| DT - FIG | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.40% | ||
More | ||||