FIG
Price
$25.22
Change
-$0.51 (-1.98%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.44B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HUBS
Price
$248.38
Change
-$6.74 (-2.64%)
Updated
Sep 4, 03:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.72B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FIG vs HUBS

FIG vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FIG vs. HUBS commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIG is a Hold and HUBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FIG: $25.22 vs. HUBS: $255.12)
Brand notoriety: FIG and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FIG: 79% vs. HUBS: 53%
Market capitalization -- FIG: $13.44B vs. HUBS: $12.72B
FIG [@Packaged Software] is valued at $13.44B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $12.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $242.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FIG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FIG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FIG and HUBS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FIG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FIG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than FIG.

Price Growth

FIG (@Packaged Software) experienced а -17.64% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FIG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.50% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIG($13.4B) has a higher market cap than HUBS($12.7B). FIG YTD gains are higher at: -32.513 vs. HUBS (-36.427). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 267M vs. FIG (-1.45B). HUBS (1.69B) and FIG (1.65B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FIG has less debt than HUBS: FIG (56.2M) vs HUBS (247M). HUBS has higher revenues than FIG: HUBS (3.3B) vs FIG (1.16B).
FIGHUBSFIG / HUBS
Capitalization13.4B12.7B106%
EBITDA-1.45B267M-542%
Gain YTD-32.513-36.42789%
P/E RatioN/A90.79-
Revenue1.16B3.3B35%
Total Cash1.65B1.69B98%
Total Debt56.2M247M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FIG vs HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
FIG
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8712
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
9983
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUBS's Valuation (77) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FIG (89) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.

FIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (83) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FIG (99) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.

FIG's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FIG’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FIG (100) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to FIG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIGHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HUBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LULU121.771.70
+1.42%
lululemon athletica
CDNA49.860.26
+0.52%
CareDx
ZYBT1.63N/A
N/A
Zhengye Biotechnology Holding Limited
NWAX10.16-0.03
-0.29%
New America Acquisition I Corp.
IMCC2.20-0.80
-26.67%
IM Cannabis Corp