Regional banks occupy a distinct and closely watched segment of the U.S. financial sector — large enough to serve commercial clients with sophisticated needs, yet nimble enough to maintain community-level relationships. ASB (Associated Banc-Corp) and VLY (Valley National Bancorp) exemplify this middle-ground positioning and invite a natural side-by-side comparison. Both institutions have undergone meaningful transformation in recent years, navigating a high-interest-rate environment while pursuing growth through different playbooks. For investors evaluating regional bank exposure, understanding how these two names compare across dimensions such as growth strategy, asset quality, margin trends, and market sentiment offers a practical framework for assessing relative opportunity within the space.
ASB, headquartered in Green Bay, Wisconsin, is the largest bank holding company based in its home state and operates more than 200 branches across the Midwest. The company's defining event in recent months has been the completion of its acquisition of American National Corporation, which closed on April 1, 2026. This transaction added nearly $4 billion in loan balances and over $4 billion in deposits, propelling ASB's total assets to approximately $50 billion and extending its reach into Nebraska and key metropolitan markets such as Omaha and the Twin Cities.
In its most recent quarterly report, ASB posted adjusted earnings per share of $0.73, exceeding consensus estimates by a penny. Total period-end loans surged 15% sequentially to $36.5 billion, while deposits grew 12% to $39.9 billion — both figures reflecting the American National contribution. Organic loan growth also remained healthy at 3% quarter-over-quarter. Net interest income (NII — the difference between what a bank earns on loans and pays on deposits) rose 20% from the prior quarter to $370 million, and the net interest margin (NIM) expanded 14 basis points to 3.17%. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance for total loan growth to 18%–20% and expects NII growth of 19%–21% compared with standalone 2025 results. The CET1 ratio stood at 10.47%, and the adjusted efficiency ratio improved to 52.9%, indicating stronger profitability per dollar of revenue. Integration of American National remains on track, with full system conversion expected by October 2026 and cost-savings targets increased from 25% to 30% of the acquired entity's expense base.
VLY, headquartered in Wayne, New Jersey, operates as the holding company for Valley National Bank, a regional institution with over $64 billion in assets and more than 220 branch locations. With roots dating back to 1927, VLY has grown into one of the largest banks in New Jersey and now serves clients across multiple states including New York, Florida, Alabama, California, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Arizona. Under the leadership of CEO Ira Robbins, the bank has focused on diversifying its loan portfolio, growing low-cost core deposits, and investing in technology and artificial intelligence to drive operational efficiency.
In its most recent quarter, VLY reported adjusted earnings per share of $0.30, slightly below consensus by a penny, though total revenue of $562.1 million exceeded expectations with a 13.3% year-over-year increase. Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis rose 12.6% to approximately $488 million, and NIM expanded three basis points sequentially to 3.20%. Loan growth was robust at $1.6 billion — roughly 13% annualized — driven by commercial and industrial (C&I) lending and owner-occupied commercial real estate (CRE). Deposits increased to $54.1 billion, supported by nearly $300 million in non-interest-bearing deposit growth. Critically, VLY's CRE concentration ratio declined from 329% to 317% as a result of organic capital generation and a $500 million subordinated debt issuance. The efficiency ratio improved to 52.1%, and the CET1 ratio remained solid at 10.71%. Management highlighted AI-driven cost savings of approximately $15 million in the expense run rate against roughly $3–4 million in new AI-related spending, underscoring a tangible return on technology investments.
In today's fast-moving markets, many traders and investors turn to algorithm-driven tools to identify opportunities and manage risk with greater speed and consistency. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI-powered trading bots, drawn from a larger universe of hundreds of available bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies — ranging from short-term breakout and trend-following models to longer-term valuation-based approaches — each with its own trading style, timeframe, statistical profile, and set of monitored securities. Some bots have demonstrated annualized returns exceeding 100% in select periods, with profitable trade ratios above 70% in favorable conditions, though individual results vary based on market dynamics and strategy parameters. Only the bots most suited to prevailing market conditions earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section, giving users a filtered view of what is currently performing. Exploring this page can help traders discover AI-driven strategies aligned with their own objectives and risk tolerance.
While ASB and VLY both operate as regional bank holding companies, their growth narratives diverge in instructive ways. ASB's story centers on a transformative acquisition that materially expanded its balance sheet and geographic footprint. The American National deal has boosted ASB's total assets, loan portfolio, and deposit base in a single quarter — but it also introduces integration risk and near-term pressure from nonrecurring merger expenses, which totaled $24 million in the most recent quarter alone. ASB's tangible book value dilution of 1.9% from the deal, though manageable, means the full earnings accretion story will take time to materialize.
VLY, by contrast, has pursued an organic growth path, emphasizing core deposit gathering, relationship-based C&I lending, and operational efficiency gains powered by technology. Its larger asset base ($64 billion vs. $50 billion) and more geographically diversified footprint provide a degree of resilience against regional economic downturns. VLY's NIM of 3.20% slightly edges out ASB's 3.17%, reflecting effective management of deposit costs and loan pricing. On credit quality, both banks show manageable but distinct profiles: ASB's allowance for credit losses (ACLL) ratio stands at 1.36% of total loans versus VLY's 1.16%, suggesting ASB carries a somewhat more conservative reserve cushion. VLY's criticized and classified asset ratio declined meaningfully to 7.3% from 9.0% a year ago, signaling improving credit trends, while ASB's non-accrual loans ticked higher partly due to acquired portfolio alignment.
Market sentiment paints a nuanced picture. Wall Street analysts currently assign VLY a consensus "Moderate Buy" rating with an average price target above $16, implying meaningful upside from recent trading levels near $14.50. ASB, trading near $30, also benefits from constructive analyst coverage, with some fair-value estimates suggesting the stock may be modestly undervalued following its Q2 2026 report. VLY trades at a lower price-to-earnings multiple (approximately 13x versus higher levels for ASB), partly reflecting differences in scale, growth trajectory, and perceived execution risk around the American National integration.
Based on observable data across both stocks, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely express a modest preference for VLY in the current environment, though the case is not one-sided. VLY's combination of a slightly wider net interest margin, steadily improving efficiency ratio, declining CRE concentration, tangible AI-driven cost savings, and a cleaner organic growth trajectory without acquisition-related noise presents a more consistent and predictable earnings profile. ASB's acquisition of American National Corporation is a significant positive catalyst that could generate substantial long-term value, but the near-term integration complexity and associated nonrecurring costs introduce uncertainty that quantitative models often discount. Both banks maintain strong capital positions and benefit from constructive industry trends, but VLY's larger deposit franchise, broader geographic reach, and demonstrated progress on the efficiency front give it a marginal edge in a probabilistic assessment. As always, relative positioning can shift quickly with new earnings data, macroeconomic developments, or changes in the interest rate outlook, and neither stock represents a one-size-fits-all proposition.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileVLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ASB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.07% price change this week, while VLY (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.56%.
ASB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
VLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| ASB | VLY | ASB / VLY | |
| Capitalization | 5.78B | 7.94B | 73% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.080 | 24.949 | 84% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.71 | 12.16 | 88% |
| Revenue | 1.52B | 2.09B | 73% |
| Total Cash | 465M | 362M | 128% |
| Total Debt | 4.01B | 2.98B | 135% |
ASB | VLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASB's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as VLY (30). This means that ASB’s stock grew similarly to VLY’s over the last 12 months.
ASB's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLY (69). This means that ASB’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLY’s over the last 12 months.
VLY's SMR Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ASB (22). This means that VLY’s stock grew similarly to ASB’s over the last 12 months.
VLY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ASB (44). This means that VLY’s stock grew similarly to ASB’s over the last 12 months.
VLY's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASB (98). This means that VLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASB’s over the last 12 months.
| ASB | VLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 61% | 13 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 59% |