ATMU
Price
$54.14
Change
-$1.36 (-2.45%)
Updated
May 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.53B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLS
Price
$66.45
Change
-$2.97 (-4.28%)
Updated
May 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.86B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATMU vs FLS

Header iconATMU vs FLS Comparison
Open Charts ATMU vs FLSBanner chart's image
ATMU vs FLS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) vs. Flowserve Corporation (FLS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both ATMU and FLS operate in the industrial equipment sector, with ATMU specializing in filtration products and FLS in flow control systems like pumps and valves.
  • FLS shows stronger year-to-date performance at +21.8% compared to ATMU's +16.6%, reflecting robust momentum in recent market activity.
  • ATMU trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 24.2 versus FLS's 31.9, suggesting relative value in the smaller-cap filtration play.
  • FLS boasts a larger market capitalization of $10.8 billion and higher revenue of $4.7 billion, providing greater scale and diversification.
  • Recent developments include ATMU joining the S&P SmallCap 600 and expanding its European lab, while FLS approaches Q1 earnings with positive analyst expectations.
  • Tickeron's analysis indicates FLS as the preferable pick in both short- and long-term horizons based on technical and fundamental metrics.

Introduction

In the competitive industrial machinery sector, ATMU and FLS stand out for their specialized roles in filtration and flow management. This stock comparison evaluates their recent market positioning, performance trends, and growth drivers amid broader economic shifts. Traders seeking sector exposure and investors eyeing relative value will benefit from insights into momentum, valuation, and catalysts. Both companies have delivered strong gains over the past year, but divergences in scale, technical signals, and upcoming events shape their current trajectories in a volatile environment.

ATMU Overview and Recent Performance

Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) designs and manufactures filtration solutions under the Fleetguard brand for on-highway and off-highway vehicles in agriculture, construction, mining, and power generation. Spun off from Cummins in 2023, the company focuses on innovative media, systems integration, and digital diagnostics.

In recent weeks, ATMU shares have traded around $60, near the upper end of their 52-week range of $33.58–$66.50, with a market cap of approximately $4.9 billion. Year-to-date gains stand at 16.6%, supported by solid fundamentals including $1.76 billion in revenue and $330 million EBITDA. Sentiment has been buoyed by inclusion in the S&P SmallCap 600 index and the opening of an expanded testing lab in Quimper, France, signaling OEM innovation. However, shares experienced volatility, including a plunge tied to market pressures, ahead of Q1 results on May 1. Analyst targets average $68.60, implying upside potential.

FLS Overview and Recent Performance

Flowserve Corporation (FLS) engineers comprehensive flow control systems, including pumps, valves, seals, and aftermarket services for industries worldwide. Operating across diverse sectors like energy, chemicals, and water management, it emphasizes precision-engineered solutions.

Recent market activity has seen FLS shares hover near $84, within a 52-week range peaking at $92.41, backed by a $10.8 billion market cap. The stock has outperformed with 21.8% YTD returns, driven by $4.73 billion revenue and $699 million EBITDA. Positive momentum includes a 7.7% surge in recent sessions and strong Q4 positioning in gas and liquid handling. Upcoming Q1 earnings on April 30 carry growth expectations, with investor conferences enhancing visibility. These factors have sustained upward sentiment despite short-term fluctuations.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from a library of 351, tailored to current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from +23.9% to +163.7%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profits up to $48,782 per bot. Employing diverse strategies like trend trading, swing trades, multi-agent systems, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., 3% TP/2% SL), they operate on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, targeting sectors such as semiconductors, industrials, small caps, and gold miners with 3–18 tickers each. Explore these high-conviction signals to enhance your trading edge in dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ATMU’s niche in vehicle filtration contrasts with FLS’s broader flow management portfolio, exposing FLS to more diversified end-markets but potentially higher operational complexity. Growth drivers for ATMU include spin-off efficiencies and European expansion, while FLS benefits from aftermarket services and industrial recovery. Recent momentum favors FLS with superior technical scores (6 bullish vs. 3 for ATMU) and YTD edge. Risk factors involve cyclical demand; ATMU faces smaller scale vulnerabilities, whereas FLS carries more debt. Sector overlap in industrials amplifies relative performance tracking, with FLS showing higher volume and stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors FLS over ATMU, citing stronger short-term technical indicators (e.g., 82% momentum odds), higher YTD gains, and superior scale in revenue and EBITDA. While ATMU offers value via lower P/E and catalysts like index inclusion, FLS’s trend consistency and positioning suggest higher probability of outperformance in prevailing conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ATMU vs. FLS commentary
May 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATMU is a Hold and FLS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 14, 2026
Stock price -- (ATMU: $55.50 vs. FLS: $69.43)
Brand notoriety: ATMU and FLS are both not notable
ATMU represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while FLS is part of the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATMU: 57% vs. FLS: 124%
Market capitalization -- ATMU: $4.42B vs. FLS: $8.49B
ATMU [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $4.42B. FLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $8.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $74.34B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $285.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $7.04B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $18.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATMU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ATMU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the long-term than ATMU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATMU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATMU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ATMU is a better buy in the short-term than FLS.

Price Growth

ATMU (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +3.84% price change this week, while FLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

ATMU is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

FLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.16% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Industrial Machinery (-0.42% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLS($8.86B) has a higher market cap than ATMU($4.53B). FLS has higher P/E ratio than ATMU: FLS (25.53) vs ATMU (21.76). ATMU YTD gains are higher at: 7.006 vs. FLS (0.375). FLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 710M vs. ATMU (344M). FLS has more cash in the bank: 792M vs. ATMU (210M). ATMU has less debt than FLS: ATMU (1.06B) vs FLS (1.89B). FLS has higher revenues than ATMU: FLS (4.65B) vs ATMU (1.83B).
ATMUFLSATMU / FLS
Capitalization4.53B8.86B51%
EBITDA344M710M48%
Gain YTD7.0060.3751,868%
P/E Ratio21.7625.5385%
Revenue1.83B4.65B39%
Total Cash210M792M27%
Total Debt1.06B1.89B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLS: Fundamental Ratings
FLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATMUFLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATMU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDTIX45.67N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock I
SMVTX14.46N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity I
IUAAX33.79N/A
N/A
VY® Invesco Equity and Income A
NWQFX40.97-0.35
-0.85%
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Value R6
RSLCX75.63-1.13
-1.47%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R3

ATMU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATMU has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ATMU jumps, then PH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATMU
1D Price
Change %
ATMU100%
-1.94%
PH - ATMU
73%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
DOV - ATMU
69%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
ITT - ATMU
68%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
CMI - ATMU
67%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
DCI - ATMU
67%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
More

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
-1.89%
FELE - FLS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
ATMU - FLS
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
ITT - FLS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
LECO - FLS
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
KMT - FLS
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
More