ATMU
Price
$51.01
Change
+$1.22 (+2.45%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.16B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLS
Price
$80.87
Change
-$0.28 (-0.35%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
10.28B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATMU vs FLS

ATMU vs FLS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) vs. Flowserve Corporation (FLS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Atmus Filtration Technologies (ATMU) has delivered stronger one-year price appreciation of approximately 41%, outpacing Flowserve (FLS) at roughly 35% over the same period, though both have meaningfully outperformed the broader industrials sector.
  • FLS offers a substantially higher dividend yield of around 1.22% compared to ATMU's 0.41%, making it more attractive for income-oriented investors.
  • Both stocks have pulled back from their respective 52-week highs in recent months — ATMU down from $66.50 and FLS down from $92.41 — reflecting broader market rotation and sector-level headwinds.
  • FLS commands a significantly larger market capitalization (~$9.3 billion versus ~$4.4 billion for ATMU) and operates with greater revenue scale, though ATMU has demonstrated superior gross and operating margin profiles in recent quarters.
  • FLS benefits from a robust aftermarket services backlog and strategic M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity, while ATMU is still navigating its post-separation independence and accelerating its share repurchase program.

Introduction

Investors evaluating opportunities in the industrial and manufacturing space are increasingly comparing companies that serve complementary but distinct segments of the global economy. ATMU (Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.) and FLS (Flowserve Corporation) represent two fundamentally different plays within industrial markets — one focused on advanced filtration systems for vehicles and heavy equipment, the other on mission-critical flow control solutions for global infrastructure. Despite operating in different niches, both companies are influenced by similar macroeconomic currents: global industrial demand, infrastructure spending trends, and the evolving energy transition landscape. This comparison examines how these two stocks have performed in the current market environment, helping traders and investors assess their relative positioning, growth trajectories, and risk profiles.

ATMU Overview and Recent Performance

Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU), headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, designs, manufactures, and sells filtration products primarily under the Fleetguard brand. The company serves on-highway commercial vehicles as well as off-highway agriculture, construction, mining, and power generation equipment. With approximately 4,500 employees and a market capitalization near $4.4 billion, ATMU operates as a focused pure-play in the filtration and aftermarket services industry.

In recent months, ATMU shares have traded in the low-to-mid $50s, reflecting a recovery from the mid-$40s seen in early June 2026. The stock's 52-week range extends from $37.22 to $66.50, with the recent pullback from the February 2026 peak mirroring broader industrial-sector softness. Over the past year, ATMU has posted a total return of approximately 41%, driven by solid operational execution following its full separation from former parent Cummins. The company has aggressively pursued share repurchases, buying back $30 million in stock during its most recently reported quarter alone. Revenue has grown at a healthy clip — approximately 10.9% year-over-year in the 2025 third quarter — supported by share gains and pricing actions. Analyst sentiment remains favorable, with a consensus "Buy" rating and an average price target of $66.40, implying meaningful upside from current levels. Key catalysts include the ongoing ramp-up of aftermarket digital services, margin expansion initiatives, and continued capital return to shareholders.

FLS Overview and Recent Performance

Flowserve Corporation (FLS), based in Irving, Texas, is one of the world's leading providers of fluid motion and control products and services. The company designs, manufactures, and services industrial pumps, valves, and mechanical seals for customers across energy, chemicals, water management, nuclear power, and other process industries. With roughly 16,000 employees and a market capitalization of approximately $9.3 billion, FLS operates at a considerably larger scale than ATMU.

In recent trading, FLS shares have hovered around the $72 level, recovering from a dip into the mid-$60s in mid-July 2026. The stock's 52-week range spans from $48.71 to $92.41 — a notably wide band that underscores the volatility inherent in industrial cyclical names. Over the trailing twelve months, FLS has generated a total return near 35%, supported by strong operational momentum and the successful execution of its 3D Growth Strategy — Diversify, Decarbonize, and Digitize. From a fundamental standpoint, full-year 2025 results were robust: total bookings reached $4.7 billion, including approximately $400 million in nuclear awards, and adjusted EPS (earnings per share) came in at $3.64. The company also returned $365 million to shareholders through dividends and buybacks. A key strategic development in recent months was the announced acquisition of Trillium Flow Technologies' Valves Division, which expands FLS's footprint in nuclear and critical infrastructure applications. Additionally, the company received a $266 million termination payment after its planned merger with Chart Industries was called off, shoring up the balance sheet. Looking ahead, management has guided for 2026 adjusted EPS of $4.00 to $4.20 and has laid out ambitious 2030 targets including approximately 20% adjusted operating margins.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge in navigating stocks like ATMU and FLS, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes, but only those demonstrating the strongest real-time alignment with current market dynamics earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary widely in trading style — from short-term swing trading and momentum-based approaches to longer-duration trend-following strategies — and each bot carries its own set of performance statistics, win rates, and risk parameters. By focusing on bots that have recently proven effective under live market conditions, this curated list helps users cut through the noise and identify automated strategies that may align with their own investment objectives. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently leading the pack.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing ATMU and FLS side by side, several meaningful contrasts emerge. From a business model perspective, ATMU is a focused filtration specialist with deep ties to commercial vehicle and heavy equipment cycles, while FLS is a diversified flow-control conglomerate spanning pumps, valves, seals, and aftermarket services across multiple end markets including energy and water infrastructure. This gives FLS broader revenue diversification but also exposes it to a wider array of macroeconomic variables, including oil and gas capital expenditure cycles.

On valuation, ATMU trades at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of approximately 20.9, notably below FLS's trailing P/E of roughly 26.6. However, FLS offers a forward P/E that compresses meaningfully given its 2026 adjusted EPS guidance, making its valuation premium less stark on a forward-looking basis. In terms of shareholder returns, FLS pays a substantially higher dividend yield (~1.22% versus ~0.41%), appealing to investors who prioritize income alongside capital appreciation.

Regarding growth momentum, ATMU has demonstrated faster top-line expansion in percentage terms, though from a much smaller base. FLS counters with a massive $2.9 billion backlog that provides multi-quarter revenue visibility and meaningful aftermarket-driven recurring revenue. On risk factors, ATMU faces concentration risk tied to the commercial vehicle cycle, while FLS must contend with tariff headwinds — management has previously estimated an annualized impact of $90 million to $100 million — as well as uneven original equipment bookings. Both stocks carry betas above 1.0, indicating higher-than-market volatility, with FLS at 1.25 and ATMU at 1.19.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative stability of catalysts, and current market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely tilt in favor of ATMU for shorter-to-intermediate-term momentum-oriented strategies. The stock's cleaner uptrend structure, more attractive valuation multiples, and straightforward post-separation growth narrative — supported by aggressive buybacks and expanding margins — create a comparatively clearer signal path for trend-following algorithms. That said, FLS would likely be favored by AI models optimized for longer-duration, value-plus-income strategies, given its robust backlog, higher dividend yield, strategic M&A pipeline, and well-defined 2026 and 2030 financial targets. Neither stock is without risk, and the AI's relative preference would ultimately depend on the specific trading style, timeframe, and risk parameters programmed into each individual bot. The probabilistic assessment suggests that under current conditions, ATMU offers the more cohesive near-term momentum profile, while FLS presents a compelling case for patient, fundamentally driven investors.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ATMU vs. FLS commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATMU is a StrongBuy and FLS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (ATMU: $51.01 vs. FLS: $80.87)
Brand notoriety: ATMU and FLS are both not notable
ATMU represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while FLS is part of the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATMU: 101% vs. FLS: 70%
Market capitalization -- ATMU: $4.16B vs. FLS: $10.28B
ATMU [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $4.16B. FLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $10.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $73.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $283.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.37B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $17.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATMU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ATMU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the long-term than ATMU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATMU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATMU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the short-term than ATMU.

Price Growth

ATMU (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while FLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.47%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

ATMU is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.

FLS is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.09% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Industrial Machinery (+1.10% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLS($10.3B) has a higher market cap than ATMU($4.16B). FLS has higher P/E ratio than ATMU: FLS (28.18) vs ATMU (19.54). FLS YTD gains are higher at: 17.258 vs. ATMU (-1.540). FLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 730M vs. ATMU (344M). FLS has more cash in the bank: 731M vs. ATMU (210M). ATMU has less debt than FLS: ATMU (1.06B) vs FLS (2.32B). FLS has higher revenues than ATMU: FLS (4.63B) vs ATMU (1.83B).
ATMUFLSATMU / FLS
Capitalization4.16B10.3B40%
EBITDA344M730M47%
Gain YTD-1.54017.258-9%
P/E Ratio19.5428.1869%
Revenue1.83B4.63B39%
Total Cash210M731M29%
Total Debt1.06B2.32B46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLS: Fundamental Ratings
FLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
45
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATMUFLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATMU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCAD57.740.77
+1.35%
Gabelli Comm. Aerospace & Defense ETF
DWSH5.530.07
+1.28%
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
SHLD70.810.54
+0.77%
Global X Defense Tech ETF
EMMF37.960.04
+0.09%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Mltfctr
FIIG20.45-0.05
-0.24%
First Trust Intermediate DurInvGrdCrpETF

ATMU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATMU has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ATMU jumps, then PH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATMU
1D Price
Change %
ATMU100%
+2.45%
PH - ATMU
73%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
DOV - ATMU
69%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
ITT - ATMU
68%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
CMI - ATMU
67%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
DCI - ATMU
67%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
More