ATPC
Price
$2.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.2M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAMA
Price
$12.96
Change
+$0.13 (+1.01%)
Updated
Oct 6, 11:07 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
619.99M
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATPC vs MAMA

ATPC vs MAMA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATPC vs. MAMA commentary
Oct 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATPC is a Hold and MAMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATPC vs MAMA: Fundamental Ratings
ATPC
MAMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
278
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
9278
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8763
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2662
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAMA's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (94). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATPC (100). This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (92). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as ATPC (87). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to ATPC’s over the last 12 months.

ATPC's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAMA (62). This means that ATPC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATPCMAMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2026
Stock price -- (ATPC: $2.12 vs. MAMA: $12.82)
Brand notoriety: ATPC and MAMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATPC: 22% vs. MAMA: 70%
Market capitalization -- ATPC: $2.2M vs. MAMA: $619.99M
ATPC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $2.2M. MAMA’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $619.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $68.81K to $239.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MAMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ATPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than ATPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATPC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATPC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the short-term than ATPC.

Price Growth

ATPC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -3.64% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Dec 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.79% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

View a ticker or compare two or three
ATPC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBSX1.710.21
+13.67%
FST Corp
UHS176.050.33
+0.19%
Universal Health Services
BCRX8.10-0.07
-0.86%
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals
RAYA1.93-0.04
-2.03%
Erayak Power Solution Group Inc.
ULH17.63-0.83
-4.50%
Universal Logistics Holdings

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and HLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and HLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
-0.85%
HLF - MAMA
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
NOMD - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
LW - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
CENT - MAMA
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
More