AU
Price
$89.34
Change
-$4.13 (-4.42%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
45.17B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HMY
Price
$16.37
Change
-$0.08 (-0.49%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
10.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AU vs HMY

Header iconAU vs HMY Comparison
Open Charts AU vs HMYBanner chart's image
AU vs HMY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? AngloGold Ashanti (AU) vs. Harmony Gold Mining (HMY) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AU has significantly outperformed HMY over the past year with returns around 136%, compared to HMY's modest 5% gain, driven by stronger production growth and higher gold prices.
  • Recent market activity shows both stocks experiencing pullbacks, with AU down about 10% in the past month and HMY down 2%, amid broader gold sector volatility.
  • AU trades at a higher forward P/E ratio of approximately 17.5 versus HMY's 10, reflecting premium valuation for its diversified operations but offering higher liquidity with $4.4 billion.
  • Year-to-date, AU is up 6-8% while HMY is down 22%, highlighting AU's relative stability in recent weeks.
  • Both companies benefit from elevated gold prices, but AU's global footprint across Africa, Australia, and the Americas contrasts with HMY's primary South African focus, exposing HMY to regional risks.
  • Tickeron's AI robots feature gold miners strategies with up to 61% annualized returns, underscoring sector potential amid inflation fears.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines AU (AngloGold Ashanti plc) and HMY (Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited), two prominent gold miners navigating a volatile precious metals market. Gold stocks like these attract investors seeking hedges against inflation and geopolitical tensions, as well as traders capitalizing on price swings tied to metal spot prices. With recent gold price fluctuations influencing sentiment, this analysis highlights their relative performance, business models, and market positioning to aid informed decision-making in the current environment.

AU Overview and Recent Performance

AngloGold Ashanti plc (AU) is a global gold producer with operations in Africa, Australia, and the Americas, exploring and extracting gold alongside by-products like silver. Its flagship assets include the Geita mine in Tanzania. In recent market activity, AU shares have traded around $90-93, reflecting a pullback of about 10% over the past month amid broader sector pressures, though year-to-date gains stand at 6-8% and one-year returns exceed 135%. Sentiment has been shaped by record 2025 adjusted EBITDA of $6.3 billion (up 129% year-over-year), driven by 16% higher gold production from assets like the acquired Sukari mine, and strong free cash flow of $2.9 billion. Recent developments include a debt tender offer and positive analyst notes on Nevada reserves (4.9 million ounces), supporting reserve growth to 36.5 million ounces. However, higher expected costs in 2026 and EPS estimate revisions have tempered short-term momentum.

HMY Overview and Recent Performance

Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) is South Africa's largest gold producer by volume, with underground and surface operations in the Witwatersrand Basin, plus interests in Papua New Guinea and Australia, targeting gold, uranium, silver, and copper. Shares recently hovered near $15.50, with a 2% monthly decline but higher volume reflecting trader interest. Year-to-date performance lags at -22%, and one-year returns are around 5%, underperforming the sector amid production challenges. Key influences include strong interim six-month results with 39% adjusted EBITDA growth and doubled dividends, fueled by higher gold prices and 724,099 ounces produced in H1 fiscal 2026. Operational hurdles like weather disruptions, safety stoppages, and a fatal incident at Target 1 mine have pressured output, with fiscal 2026 guidance at 1.4-1.5 million ounces. Analyst upgrades, such as Morgan Stanley to Overweight, signal improving sentiment despite regional risks in South Africa.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers, selected by AI analysis for superior performance in current market conditions like volatility and sector rotations. These bots showcase diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles, with standout stats including annualized returns up to 162%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7 across sectors like semiconductors, energy, and precious metals. Gold miners bots, for instance, deliver 54-61% returns with 56-58% win rates on portfolios blending miners, silver, copper, and infrastructure. This curated section highlights bots best suited to today's environment, offering traders data-driven insights. Explore the Trending AI Robots to see real-time leaders and potentially enhance your strategy.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AU and HMY operate in gold mining but differ in scale and exposure: AU's diversified portfolio spans three continents for broader risk mitigation, while HMY's South Africa-heavy model (nine underground operations) ties performance to local factors like labor and power stability. Growth drivers favor AU with 16% production upside in 2025 versus HMY's flat-to-slight dip amid weather and safety issues. Recent momentum shows AU's superior long-term gains (YTD +6-8%, 1Y +136%) over HMY's (-22% YTD, +5% 1Y), though both face monthly dips. Risk factors include AU's higher costs and debt activity versus HMY's operational interruptions and currency volatility (ZAR-denominated revenue). Sector exposure is pure-play gold for both, but AU's $46B market cap dwarfs HMY's $10B, implying greater liquidity. Market sentiment leans toward AU on stronger fundamentals, yet HMY's lower P/E (10 vs. 17.5) and recent upgrades suggest value appeal in a gold rebound.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently favor AU over HMY, based on trend consistency from robust 2025 production and cash flow metrics, plus superior relative positioning with over 130% one-year returns and growing reserves. AU's global diversification and positive analyst targets (average $120) indicate higher probability of outperformance amid sustained gold demand, though HMY's valuation discount could narrow gaps if South African operations stabilize.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
AU vs. HMY commentary
May 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AU is a StrongBuy and HMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 20, 2026
Stock price -- (AU: $89.34 vs. HMY: $16.37)
Brand notoriety: AU and HMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AU: 95% vs. HMY: 113%
Market capitalization -- AU: $45.17B vs. HMY: $10.25B
AU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $45.17B. HMY’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $10.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AU’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AU is a better buy in the long-term than HMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HMY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HMY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HMY is a better buy in the short-term than AU.

Price Growth

AU (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.37% price change this week, while HMY (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -6.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

AU is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-6.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AU($45.2B) has a higher market cap than HMY($10.2B). AU has higher P/E ratio than HMY: AU (13.12) vs HMY (10.65). AU YTD gains are higher at: 6.521 vs. HMY (-14.474). HMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.8B vs. AU (5.76B). HMY has higher revenues than AU: HMY (81.2B) vs AU (11.2B).
AUHMYAU / HMY
Capitalization45.2B10.2B443%
EBITDA5.76B31.8B18%
Gain YTD6.521-14.474-45%
P/E Ratio13.1210.65123%
Revenue11.2B81.2B14%
Total Cash3.15BN/A-
Total Debt2.29BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AU vs HMY: Fundamental Ratings
AU
HMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
645
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3349
SMR RATING
1..100
2120
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5382
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AU's Valuation (4) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HMY (9). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to HMY’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HMY (49). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to HMY’s over the last 12 months.

HMY's SMR Rating (20) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AU (21). This means that HMY’s stock grew similarly to AU’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HMY (60). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to HMY’s over the last 12 months.

AU's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HMY (82). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to HMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUHMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UMC17.580.46
+2.69%
United Microelectronic Corp
MAT15.020.08
+0.50%
Mattel
CRAI144.990.08
+0.06%
CRA International
GIGM1.41N/A
N/A
GigaMedia Limited
CZWI20.17-0.34
-1.66%
Citizens Community Bancorp

AU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AU has been closely correlated with GFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AU jumps, then GFI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AU
1D Price
Change %
AU100%
-4.42%
GFI - AU
90%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
KGC - AU
87%
Closely correlated
-3.75%
AEM - AU
85%
Closely correlated
-3.24%
WPM - AU
84%
Closely correlated
-4.13%
DRD - AU
82%
Closely correlated
-4.28%
More