AUB
Price
$42.27
Change
-$0.93 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.05B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNFP
Price
$99.50
Change
-$1.32 (-1.31%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.04B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUB vs PNFP

AUB vs PNFP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUB vs. PNFP commentary
Jul 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUB is a StrongBuy and PNFP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AUB: $43.19 vs. PNFP: $100.82)
Brand notoriety: AUB and PNFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUB: 146% vs. PNFP: 106%
Market capitalization -- AUB: $6.05B vs. PNFP: $15.04B
AUB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.05B. PNFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PNFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUB is a better buy in the long-term than PNFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PNFP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AUB and PNFP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AUB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.83% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUB is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.60% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($15B) has a higher market cap than AUB($6.05B). AUB has higher P/E ratio than PNFP: AUB (16.93) vs PNFP (13.42). AUB YTD gains are higher at: 22.025 vs. PNFP (5.340). PNFP has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. AUB (234M). AUB has less debt than PNFP: AUB (1.16B) vs PNFP (5.74B). PNFP has higher revenues than AUB: PNFP (2.54B) vs AUB (1.53B).
AUBPNFPAUB / PNFP
Capitalization6.05B15B40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.0255.340412%
P/E Ratio16.9313.42126%
Revenue1.53B2.54B60%
Total Cash234M295M79%
Total Debt1.16B5.74B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUB vs PNFP: Fundamental Ratings
AUB
PNFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4215
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6881
SMR RATING
1..100
2217
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3574
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUB's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as PNFP (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as PNFP (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (22) in the null industry. This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PNFP (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (74) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBPNFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNFP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVFG34.790.33
+0.96%
Monarch Volume Factor Gbl Uncons ETF
VEA70.810.45
+0.64%
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
MVRL13.740.01
+0.05%
ETRACS Mnthly Py 1.5X Lvgd Mtg REIT ETN
GENT10.23N/A
N/A
Genter Capital Taxable Qual Interm ETF
PID22.42N/A
N/A
Invesco International Div Achiev ETF

AUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUB has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUB jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUB
1D Price
Change %
AUB100%
-2.15%
UCB - AUB
90%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
UBSI - AUB
90%
Closely correlated
N/A
SSB - AUB
88%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
FULT - AUB
88%
Closely correlated
N/A
CATY - AUB
87%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with CATY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then CATY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
-1.31%
CATY - PNFP
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
UBSI - PNFP
75%
Closely correlated
N/A
ONB - PNFP
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
FULT - PNFP
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
AUB - PNFP
73%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
More