Precious-metals equities have re-entered the spotlight as investors weigh inflation hedging, central-bank buying, and dollar weakness against an uncertain rate environment. The Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and the Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) both offer equity exposure to the metals and mining complex, but they are not direct competitors. AUMI concentrates on larger-cap gold producers, while SILJ targets small-cap, often exploration-stage silver miners. Comparing these two funds helps investors evaluate how different metals, market capitalizations, and fund structures shape risk, return potential, and relative positioning within the same broad sector.
AUMI is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index, which identifies the largest companies by market capitalization deriving their revenues primarily from gold mining. The portfolio is intentionally concentrated and non-diversified, typically holding roughly 25–30 names. Its top positions have recently included IAMGOLD Corp (about 5.5%), Zhaojin Mining Industry, Equinox Gold Corp, Northern Star Resources, AngloGold Ashanti, Kinross Gold Corp, and B2Gold Corp.
Because the index is dominated by gold-mining companies in the materials sector, AUMI's sector allocation is essentially 100% precious-metals mining, with meaningful geographic diversification across North America, Australia, and emerging markets. The fund carries a competitive net expense ratio of 0.35% and a relatively low portfolio turnover. Launched in late 2023, AUMI remains a smaller and younger product, which translates to lower daily trading volume and a thinner liquidity profile than more established peer funds.
SILJ is a passively managed fund that seeks to correlate, before fees and expenses, with the total return performance of the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. It is the first and only U.S.-listed ETF dedicated to small-cap silver miners, holding approximately 68 securities across producers, explorers, and royalty/streaming companies. Top holdings have recently included Hecla Mining (around 11%), Coeur Mining (around 10.8%), First Majestic Silver (around 10.6%), Wheaton Precious Metals (around 5.6%), and SSR Mining (around 4.8%).
The index uses a thematic market-capitalization weighting and is rebalanced quarterly. SILJ's expense ratio is 0.69%, reflecting the specialized, less-liquid nature of its junior-miner universe. With net assets exceeding $3 billion and more than a decade of operating history since its 2012 launch, SILJ provides substantially deeper liquidity and a broader, more diversified portfolio than AUMI — albeit with a clear small-cap tilt that amplifies both upside and downside volatility.
Both funds sit within the precious-metals equity complex, which is driven by real interest rates, the U.S. dollar, and physical metal prices. Gold has benefited from sustained central-bank accumulation and its role as a monetary safe haven, supporting the large-cap miners that dominate AUMI. Silver, by contrast, carries a dual identity: it is both a monetary metal and an industrial input used in solar panels, electronics, and electric-vehicle components. This gives SILJ additional exposure to manufacturing and green-energy demand cycles, but also ties its performance more closely to global growth and industrial activity.
Rising gold and silver prices in recent cycles have widened profit margins for miners, while higher financing costs and permitting challenges continue to pressure junior explorers. Silver's smaller market and concentrated junior universe make SILJ more sensitive to these swings than AUMI's established producers.
Over recent weeks and months, both funds have benefited from firm precious-metals prices, but their return and volatility profiles have diverged. SILJ's junior, small-cap silver miners have generally exhibited sharper moves — both up and down — than AUMI's larger-cap gold producers, reflecting silver's industrial beta and the operating leverage inherent in smaller miners. AUMI has offered steadier, more defensive positioning tied to gold's safe-haven appeal.
From a structural standpoint, SILJ's 68 holdings provide broader diversification than AUMI's concentrated ~25–30-name portfolio, yet its small-cap bias introduces higher single-stock and liquidity risk. AUMI's lower 0.35% fee is a durable cost advantage, but its thin trading volume and modest asset base create wider potential premiums and discounts to net asset value (NAV, the per-share value of a fund's holdings). For investors prioritizing liquidity and trend consistency, SILJ's scale and momentum have been the more compelling relative story in recent cycles.
Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market using technical patterns, fundamentals, trend signals, volatility, and AI-driven ratings. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs with customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener is designed to surface trade ideas, breakout candidates, and trending opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your own ETF comparison and identify the patterns that matter most to your strategy.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would currently favor SILJ over AUMI. The verdict rests primarily on SILJ's dramatically larger asset base and liquidity, its deeper 68-holding diversification, a much longer operating track record, and stronger relative trend momentum within the silver-mining space. While AUMI holds a genuine cost advantage at 0.35% versus 0.69%, its smaller scale, concentrated portfolio, and thinner trading volume weigh on its relative positioning. This assessment is probabilistic and grounded in measurable fund characteristics rather than a guarantee of future returns.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The 50-day moving average for AUMI moved below the 200-day moving average on November 04, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 28 of 36 cases where AUMI's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
AUMI moved below its 50-day moving average on November 10, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AUMI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
AUMI broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for AUMI entered a downward trend on November 06, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on AUMI as a result. In 43 of 44 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for AUMI just turned positive on November 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where AUMI's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 24 of 26 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +7.03% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AUMI advanced for three days, in 187 of 201 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator for SILJ moved out of overbought territory on November 11, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 64 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 60 of the 64 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 11, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SILJ as a result. In 73 of 80 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SILJ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
SILJ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for SILJ entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where SILJ's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 28 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SILJ just turned positive on November 04, 2026. Looking at past instances where SILJ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 49 of 53 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
Following a +9.12% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SILJ advanced for three days, in 278 of 304 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
| AUMI | SILJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUMI has been loosely correlated with TXG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AUMI jumps, then TXG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AUMI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUMI | 100% | -4.69% | ||
| TXG - AUMI | 38% Loosely correlated | -4.75% | ||
| PRU - AUMI | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| AGI - AUMI | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.17% | ||
| AU - AUMI | 1% Poorly correlated | -4.78% | ||
| EQX - AUMI | -0% Poorly correlated | -4.26% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILJ has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILJ jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILJ | 100% | -4.40% | ||
| PAAS - SILJ | 94% Closely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| CDE - SILJ | 93% Closely correlated | -4.86% | ||
| WPM - SILJ | 93% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| SKE - SILJ | 91% Closely correlated | -5.20% | ||
| OR - SILJ | 89% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NVDG | 18.84 | N/A | N/A |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long Nvda Daily ETF | |||
| USSE | 39.87 | -0.14 | -0.35% |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF (USSE) | |||
| IGI | 15.26 | -0.11 | -0.68% |
| Western Asset Investment Grade Opportunity Trust Inc | |||
| LQAI | 44.46 | -0.41 | -0.91% |
| LG QRAFT AI-Powered U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (LQAI) | |||
| IYC | 104.92 | -0.99 | -0.93% |
| iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) | |||