BAC
Price
$45.66
Change
-$1.61 (-3.41%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
299.21B
74 days until earnings call
MUFG
Price
$13.92
Change
+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
116.09B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC vs MUFG

Header iconBAC vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs MUFGBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$45.66
Change-$1.61 (-3.41%)
Volume$52.31M
Capitalization299.21B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$13.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Volume$4.87M
Capitalization116.09B
BAC vs MUFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. MUFG commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Hold and MUFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (BAC: $45.66 vs. MUFG: $13.92)
Brand notoriety: BAC: Notable vs. MUFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 132% vs. MUFG: 116%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $299.21B vs. MUFG: $116.09B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $299.21B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $116.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAC and MUFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the short-term than BAC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а -5.76% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was -5.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.41% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($299B) has a higher market cap than MUFG($116B). BAC has higher P/E ratio than MUFG: BAC (12.18) vs MUFG (8.85). MUFG YTD gains are higher at: 18.771 vs. BAC (5.162). BAC has less debt than MUFG: BAC (334B) vs MUFG (48.64T). MUFG has higher revenues than BAC: MUFG (5.66T) vs BAC (98.6B).
BACMUFGBAC / MUFG
Capitalization299B116B258%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.16218.77128%
P/E Ratio12.188.85138%
Revenue98.6B5.66T2%
Total Cash25.3BN/A-
Total Debt334B48.64T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
876
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3513
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5452
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAC's Valuation (75) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (76). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (35). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (1). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (49). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (54). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDMN50.661.91
+3.92%
WisdomTree Efcnt Gld Pls Gld Ms Stgy ETF
IFN15.540.08
+0.52%
India Fund (The)
TRSY30.070.04
+0.13%
Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF
KAPR32.42-0.33
-1.01%
Innovator Russell 2000 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
ETHE28.98-1.88
-6.09%
Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
-3.41%
WFC - BAC
86%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
C - BAC
84%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
JPM - BAC
83%
Closely correlated
-2.32%
BMO - BAC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+0.14%
SMFG - MUFG
91%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
C - MUFG
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
BCS - MUFG
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
HSBC - MUFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
UBS - MUFG
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
More