BAFN
Price
$5.07
Change
-$0.21 (-3.98%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
20.82M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBCP
Price
$15.63
Change
-$0.17 (-1.08%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
90.36M
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAFN vs UBCP

Header iconBAFN vs UBCP Comparison
Open Charts BAFN vs UBCPBanner chart's image
BAFN vs UBCP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAFN vs. UBCP commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Hold and UBCP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BAFN: $5.07 vs. UBCP: $15.63)
Brand notoriety: BAFN and UBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAFN: 66% vs. UBCP: 77%
Market capitalization -- BAFN: $20.82M vs. UBCP: $90.36M
BAFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.82M. UBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $90.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBCP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UBCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBCP is a better buy in the long-term than BAFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAFN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBCP’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UBCP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBCP is a better buy in the short-term than BAFN.

Price Growth

BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.11% price change this week, while UBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

UBCP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBCP($90.4M) has a higher market cap than BAFN($20.8M). UBCP has higher P/E ratio than BAFN: UBCP (11.58) vs BAFN (4.97). UBCP YTD gains are higher at: 12.876 vs. BAFN (-35.414). UBCP has more cash in the bank: 8.19M vs. BAFN (4.5M). BAFN has less debt than UBCP: BAFN (20.6M) vs UBCP (81.9M). BAFN has higher revenues than UBCP: BAFN (43.9M) vs UBCP (32.9M).
BAFNUBCPBAFN / UBCP
Capitalization20.8M90.4M23%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-35.41412.876-275%
P/E Ratio4.9711.5843%
Revenue43.9M32.9M133%
Total Cash4.5M8.19M55%
Total Debt20.6M81.9M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAFN vs UBCP: Fundamental Ratings
BAFN
UBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5193
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
9865
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9847
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBCP's Valuation (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAFN (20) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew similarly to BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAFN (100) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's SMR Rating (65) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAFN (98) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAFN (85) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAFN (98) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAFNUBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COHR385.0321.45
+5.90%
Coherent Corp
SMPL12.57-0.07
-0.55%
Simply Good Foods Company (The)
AREC2.14-0.03
-1.38%
American Resources Corp
NAMI0.25-0.01
-2.15%
Jinxin Technology Holding Co
BOOT170.61-4.37
-2.50%
Boot Barn Holdings

BAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAFN and BANFP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAFN and BANFP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAFN
1D Price
Change %
BAFN100%
-3.98%
BANFP - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
CBFV - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
BBDO - BAFN
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
AX - BAFN
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
PBHC - BAFN
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.04%
More

UBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBCP has been loosely correlated with BSBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBCP jumps, then BSBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBCP
1D Price
Change %
UBCP100%
-1.08%
BSBK - UBCP
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
MGYR - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
ALRS - UBCP
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
MBWM - UBCP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
BAFN - UBCP
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.98%
More