BAM
Price
$44.23
Change
-$2.83 (-6.01%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
GCMG
Price
$12.47
Change
-$0.42 (-3.26%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
415.35M
37 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs GCMG

Header iconBAM vs GCMG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs GCMGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$44.23
Change-$2.83 (-6.01%)
Volume$2.75M
Capitalization16.34B
GCM Grosvenor
Price$12.47
Change-$0.42 (-3.26%)
Volume$610.71K
Capitalization415.35M
BAM vs GCMG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. GCMG commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongBuy and GCMG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $44.23 vs. GCMG: $12.47)
Brand notoriety: BAM and GCMG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 142% vs. GCMG: 149%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. GCMG: $415.35M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. GCMG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $415.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCMG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCMG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCMG is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCMG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GCMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCMG is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -8.80% price change this week, while GCMG (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

GCMG is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-5.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than GCMG($415M). GCMG has higher P/E ratio than BAM: GCMG (80.00) vs BAM (37.12). GCMG YTD gains are higher at: 2.428 vs. BAM (-17.740). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 522M vs. GCMG (4.93M). GCMG has more cash in the bank: 44.4M vs. BAM (9M). BAM has less debt than GCMG: BAM (256M) vs GCMG (426M). GCMG has higher revenues than BAM: GCMG (457M) vs BAM (383M).
BAMGCMGBAM / GCMG
Capitalization16.3B415M3,928%
EBITDA522M4.93M10,595%
Gain YTD-17.7402.428-731%
P/E Ratio37.1280.0046%
Revenue383M457M84%
Total Cash9M44.4M20%
Total Debt256M426M60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs GCMG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
GCMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5089
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6664
SMR RATING
1..100
528
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
442
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCMG (93). This means that BAM’s stock grew significantly faster than GCMG’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (66). This means that GCMG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (52). This means that GCMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (61). This means that GCMG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (44). This means that GCMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMGCMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALSCX5.20-0.26
-4.76%
Alger Small Cap Growth B
AMVRX14.48-0.75
-4.92%
American Century Mid Cap Value R
TEMLX7.48-0.42
-5.32%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq R6
PNGYX13.36-0.96
-6.70%
Putnam International Value Y
RIEAX10.63-0.81
-7.08%
RBC International Equity A

GCMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCMG has been loosely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCMG jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCMG
1D Price
Change %
GCMG100%
-3.26%
ARES - GCMG
49%
Loosely correlated
-9.61%
BN - GCMG
48%
Loosely correlated
-8.16%
BAM - GCMG
47%
Loosely correlated
-6.01%
TPG - GCMG
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.17%
JHG - GCMG
47%
Loosely correlated
-7.81%
More