BAM
Price
$54.60
Change
+$0.40 (+0.74%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
88.14B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
GCMG
Price
$11.61
Change
+$0.12 (+1.04%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
617.89M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs GCMG

Header iconBAM vs GCMG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs GCMGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$54.60
Change+$0.40 (+0.74%)
Volume$859.68K
Capitalization88.14B
GCM Grosvenor
Price$11.61
Change+$0.12 (+1.04%)
Volume$778.75K
Capitalization617.89M
BAM vs GCMG Comparison Chart in %
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. GCMG commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Buy and GCMG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $54.60 vs. GCMG: $11.61)
Brand notoriety: BAM and GCMG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 46% vs. GCMG: 121%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $88.14B vs. GCMG: $617.89M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $88.14B. GCMG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $617.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCMG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCMG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCMG is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCMG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GCMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BAM and GCMG are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.14% price change this week, while GCMG (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

GCMG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($88.1B) has a higher market cap than GCMG($618M). GCMG has higher P/E ratio than BAM: GCMG (64.50) vs BAM (38.18). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 3.092 vs. GCMG (-2.969). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 970M vs. GCMG (122M). BAM has more cash in the bank: 480M vs. GCMG (136M). GCMG has less debt than BAM: GCMG (484M) vs BAM (1.25B). BAM has higher revenues than GCMG: BAM (835M) vs GCMG (544M).
BAMGCMGBAM / GCMG
Capitalization88.1B618M14,256%
EBITDA970M122M795%
Gain YTD3.092-2.969-104%
P/E Ratio38.1864.5059%
Revenue835M544M153%
Total Cash480M136M353%
Total Debt1.25B484M258%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs GCMG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
GCMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1166
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5482
SMR RATING
1..100
576
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as GCMG (27). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to GCMG’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as GCMG (82). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to GCMG’s over the last 12 months.

GCMG's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (57). This means that GCMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as GCMG (62). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to GCMG’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as GCMG (100). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to GCMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMGCMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VPL91.281.47
+1.64%
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
UMMA29.010.23
+0.80%
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF
IBIH26.42N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term Tips ETF
MYMH24.65N/A
N/A
SPDR SSGA My2028 Municipal Bond ETF
IFN15.18-0.05
-0.33%
India Fund (The)

GCMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCMG has been loosely correlated with OWL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCMG jumps, then OWL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCMG
1D Price
Change %
GCMG100%
+1.04%
OWL - GCMG
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
STEP - GCMG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
EQH - GCMG
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
BAM - GCMG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
HLNE - GCMG
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
More