BANC
Price
$17.89
Change
+$0.16 (+0.90%)
Updated
Sep 25, 11:56 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.81B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMBF
Price
$135.91
Change
+$0.92 (+0.68%)
Updated
Sep 25, 12:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.25B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANC vs UMBF

BANC vs UMBF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANC vs. UMBF commentary
Sep 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANC is a StrongBuy and UMBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANC vs UMBF: Fundamental Ratings
BANC
UMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8674
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8446
SMR RATING
1..100
1210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8461
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BANC's Valuation (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (67). This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANC (84). This means that UMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANC’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (12). This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (58). This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

UMBF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (84). This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANCUMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2026
Stock price -- (BANC: $17.73 vs. UMBF: $134.99)
Brand notoriety: BANC and UMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANC: 80% vs. UMBF: 123%
Market capitalization -- BANC: $2.81B vs. UMBF: $10.17B
BANC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.81B. UMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $172.4B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while UMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMBF is a better buy in the long-term than BANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UMBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BANC is a better buy in the short-term than UMBF.

Price Growth

BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.16% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

UMBF is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BANC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QCRH100.421.25
+1.26%
QCR Holdings
FBYD6.750.07
+1.05%
Falcon's Beyond Global Inc
BHFAP14.24-0.05
-0.35%
Brighthouse Financial
IMMP0.26N/A
-1.54%
Immutep Limited
PCOR49.50-1.56
-3.06%
Procore Technologies

BANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANC
1D Price
Change %
BANC100%
+0.06%
UBSI - BANC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
KEY - BANC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
COLB - BANC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
VLY - BANC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
UMBF - BANC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More

UMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMBF
1D Price
Change %
UMBF100%
+0.85%
UBSI - UMBF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
UCB - UMBF
88%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
ONB - UMBF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
ASB - UMBF
84%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
CATY - UMBF
83%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
More