BATL
Price
$1.31
Change
+$0.02 (+1.54%)
Updated
May 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
93.14M
6 days until earnings call
CNQ
Price
$32.25
Change
+$0.83 (+2.64%)
Updated
May 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
81.73B
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BATL vs CNQ

Header iconBATL vs CNQ Comparison
Open Charts BATL vs CNQBanner chart's image
Battalion Oil
Price$1.31
Change+$0.02 (+1.54%)
Volume$200
Capitalization93.14M
Canadian Natural Resources
Price$32.25
Change+$0.83 (+2.64%)
Volume$78.25K
Capitalization81.73B
BATL vs CNQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
BATL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BATL vs. CNQ commentary
May 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BATL is a Hold and CNQ is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2025
Stock price -- (BATL: $1.30 vs. CNQ: $31.42)
Brand notoriety: BATL: Not notable vs. CNQ: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BATL: 17% vs. CNQ: 74%
Market capitalization -- BATL: $93.14M vs. CNQ: $81.73B
BATL [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $93.14M. CNQ’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $81.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BATL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCNQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BATL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the long-term than BATL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BATL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BATL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CNQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BATL is a better buy in the short-term than CNQ.

Price Growth

BATL (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +12.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +4.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

BATL is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

CNQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+4.69% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNQ($81.7B) has a higher market cap than BATL($93.1M). CNQ has higher P/E ratio than BATL: CNQ (13.95) vs BATL (0.87). CNQ YTD gains are higher at: 1.782 vs. BATL (-24.419). CNQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.3B vs. BATL (50.8M). CNQ has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. BATL (42.6M). BATL has less debt than CNQ: BATL (208M) vs CNQ (10.8B). CNQ has higher revenues than BATL: CNQ (40.8B) vs BATL (250M).
BATLCNQBATL / CNQ
Capitalization93.1M81.7B0%
EBITDA50.8M17.3B0%
Gain YTD-24.4191.782-1,371%
P/E Ratio0.8713.956%
Revenue250M40.8B1%
Total Cash42.6M1.4B3%
Total Debt208M10.8B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNQ: Fundamental Ratings
CNQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BATLCNQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BATL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZKMY50.551.18
+2.39%
Suzuki Motor Co.
DUFRY5.210.07
+1.36%
AVOLTA AG
SNNAF0.02N/A
+0.65%
SIENNA RESOURCES INC
DASTY38.040.22
+0.58%
Dassault Systemes SA
ARREF1.24N/A
-0.21%
Amerigo Resources Ltd.

BATL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATL has been loosely correlated with CNQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BATL jumps, then CNQ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BATL
1D Price
Change %
BATL100%
-0.38%
CNQ - BATL
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.98%
REI - BATL
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.10%
CTRA - BATL
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.16%
EGY - BATL
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
IMPP - BATL
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
More

CNQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNQ has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNQ jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNQ
1D Price
Change %
CNQ100%
+2.98%
BTE - CNQ
82%
Closely correlated
+7.36%
FANG - CNQ
79%
Closely correlated
+3.65%
OVV - CNQ
78%
Closely correlated
+5.42%
MUR - CNQ
78%
Closely correlated
+5.12%
MEGEF - CNQ
78%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
More