It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBAR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BBAR (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.17% price change this week, while GGAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
BBAR is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
GGAL is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
BBAR | GGAL | BBAR / GGAL | |
Capitalization | 2.2B | 4.87B | 45% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 315.856 | 329.000 | 96% |
P/E Ratio | 29.60 | 58.02 | 51% |
Revenue | 646B | 693B | 93% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
BBAR | GGAL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBAR's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as GGAL (89) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBAR’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.
BBAR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as GGAL (2) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBAR’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.
BBAR's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as GGAL (1) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBAR’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.
BBAR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GGAL (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBAR’s stock grew similarly to GGAL’s over the last 12 months.
BBAR's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGAL (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGAL’s over the last 12 months.
BBAR | GGAL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% | 3 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago86% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago81% | 10 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago83% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
EMTY | 12.75 | 0.03 | +0.25% |
ProShares Decline of the Retl Store ETF | |||
OPER | 100.34 | 0.03 | +0.03% |
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF | |||
FSMB | 19.89 | N/A | N/A |
First Trust Short Dur Mgd Muncpl ETF | |||
IBTF | 23.34 | N/A | N/A |
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Tr ETF | |||
PSCJ | 27.00 | -0.06 | -0.23% |
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBAR has been closely correlated with GGAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBAR jumps, then GGAL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBAR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BBAR | 100% | -0.05% | ||
GGAL - BBAR | 89% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
SUPV - BBAR | 87% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
BMA - BBAR | 87% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
SBNY - BBAR | 39% Loosely correlated | +4.00% | ||
VBNK - BBAR | 34% Loosely correlated | -8.23% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGAL has been closely correlated with BBAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GGAL jumps, then BBAR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GGAL | 100% | +1.42% | ||
BBAR - GGAL | 89% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
BMA - GGAL | 88% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
SUPV - GGAL | 86% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
SBNY - GGAL | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.00% | ||
TBNK - GGAL | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.71% | ||
More |