BCC
Price
$86.84
Change
-$0.42 (-0.48%)
Updated
Aug 29, 12:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.26B
66 days until earnings call
MLM
Price
$612.29
Change
-$4.35 (-0.71%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
36.92B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCC vs MLM

Header iconBCC vs MLM Comparison
Open Charts BCC vs MLMBanner chart's image
Boise Cascade
Price$86.84
Change-$0.42 (-0.48%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.26B
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$612.29
Change-$4.35 (-0.71%)
Volume$292.82K
Capitalization36.92B
BCC vs MLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCC vs. MLM commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a StrongBuy and MLM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BCC: $87.27 vs. MLM: $612.29)
Brand notoriety: BCC and MLM are both not notable
BCC represents the Forest Products, while MLM is part of the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCC: 67% vs. MLM: 81%
Market capitalization -- BCC: $3.26B vs. MLM: $36.92B
BCC [@Forest Products] is valued at $3.26B. MLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $36.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $8.03B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.77B. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the long-term than BCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCC is a better buy in the short-term than MLM.

Price Growth

BCC (@Forest Products) experienced а +3.07% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

MLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-2.72% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

@Construction Materials (-0.18% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($36.9B) has a higher market cap than BCC($3.26B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than BCC: MLM (33.90) vs BCC (12.80). MLM YTD gains are higher at: 18.912 vs. BCC (-26.255). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.19B vs. BCC (523M). BCC has more cash in the bank: 481M vs. MLM (225M). BCC has less debt than MLM: BCC (508M) vs MLM (5.81B). MLM (6.69B) and BCC (6.56B) have equivalent revenues.
BCCMLMBCC / MLM
Capitalization3.26B36.9B9%
EBITDA523M2.19B24%
Gain YTD-26.25518.912-139%
P/E Ratio12.8033.9038%
Revenue6.56B6.69B98%
Total Cash481M225M214%
Total Debt508M5.81B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCC vs MLM: Fundamental Ratings
BCC
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5671
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5515
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6217
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCC's Valuation (17) in the Forest Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (90) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCC (55) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCC’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's SMR Rating (100) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BCC (100) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCC (62) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCC’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BCC (100) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HOOG63.870.97
+1.54%
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
CHN16.900.19
+1.14%
China Fund
DDLS42.060.26
+0.63%
WisdomTree Dynamic Intl SmCap Eq ETF
OCTZ42.430.19
+0.46%
TrueShares Structured Outcome OctoberETF
CGBL34.230.13
+0.38%
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
-0.71%
VMC - MLM
89%
Closely correlated
+0.00%
EXP - MLM
75%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
KNF - MLM
69%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
CRH - MLM
66%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
BCC - MLM
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
More