BCC
Price
$82.91
Change
-$0.28 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 8, 01:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.07B
87 days until earnings call
MLM
Price
$610.92
Change
+$10.62 (+1.77%)
Updated
Aug 8, 01:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
37.96B
82 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCC vs MLM

Header iconBCC vs MLM Comparison
Open Charts BCC vs MLMBanner chart's image
Boise Cascade
Price$82.91
Change-$0.28 (-0.34%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.07B
Martin Marietta Materials
Price$610.92
Change+$10.62 (+1.77%)
Volume$100
Capitalization37.96B
BCC vs MLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCC vs. MLM commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCC is a Hold and MLM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BCC: $83.19 vs. MLM: $600.30)
Brand notoriety: BCC and MLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCC: 106% vs. MLM: 214%
Market capitalization -- BCC: $6.07B vs. MLM: $37.96B
BCC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $6.07B. MLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $37.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BCC and MLM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the short-term than BCC.

Price Growth

BCC (@Construction Materials) experienced а -0.74% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +4.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

MLM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.11% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($38B) has a higher market cap than BCC($6.07B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than BCC: MLM (31.28) vs BCC (12.62). MLM YTD gains are higher at: 16.583 vs. BCC (-29.703). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.17B vs. BCC (806M). MLM has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. BCC (950M). BCC has less debt than MLM: BCC (530M) vs MLM (4.73B). BCC (6.84B) and MLM (6.78B) have equivalent revenues.
BCCMLMBCC / MLM
Capitalization6.07B38B16%
EBITDA806M2.17B37%
Gain YTD-29.70316.583-179%
P/E Ratio12.6231.2840%
Revenue6.84B6.78B101%
Total Cash950M1.27B75%
Total Debt530M4.73B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCC vs MLM: Fundamental Ratings
BCC
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
618
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5014
SMR RATING
1..100
5662
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8426
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
369
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCC's Valuation (16) in the Forest Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLM (87) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew significantly faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCC (50) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCC’s over the last 12 months.

BCC's SMR Rating (56) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as MLM (62) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that BCC’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCC (84) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCC’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as BCC (36) in the Forest Products industry. This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to BCC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCCMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVHY53.170.33
+0.63%
Eaton Vance High Yield ETF
STPZ53.970.03
+0.05%
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
AOHY11.14N/A
N/A
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF
HYTI19.84-0.01
-0.05%
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF
EWC47.34-0.39
-0.82%
iShares MSCI Canada ETF