EXP
Price
$205.14
Change
-$4.61 (-2.20%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.34B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MLM
Price
$569.35
Change
-$8.37 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
34.19B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EXP vs MLM

EXP vs MLM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EXP vs. MLM commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXP is a StrongBuy and MLM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (EXP: $205.14 vs. MLM: $569.35)
Brand notoriety: EXP and MLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EXP: 83% vs. MLM: 61%
Market capitalization -- EXP: $6.34B vs. MLM: $34.19B
EXP [@Construction Materials] is valued at $6.34B. MLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $34.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $68.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $13.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EXP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EXP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the long-term than EXP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EXP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EXP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EXP is a better buy in the short-term than MLM.

Price Growth

EXP (@Construction Materials) experienced а -5.70% price change this week, while MLM (@Construction Materials) price change was -5.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

EXP is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

MLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-3.24% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($34.2B) has a higher market cap than EXP($6.34B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than EXP: MLM (35.70) vs EXP (15.59). EXP YTD gains are higher at: -0.496 vs. MLM (-8.318). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.09B vs. EXP (759M). EXP has less debt than MLM: EXP (1.8B) vs MLM (5.69B). MLM has higher revenues than EXP: MLM (6.35B) vs EXP (2.31B).
EXPMLMEXP / MLM
Capitalization6.34B34.2B19%
EBITDA759M2.09B36%
Gain YTD-0.496-8.3186%
P/E Ratio15.5935.7044%
Revenue2.31B6.35B36%
Total CashN/A273M-
Total Debt1.8B5.69B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EXP vs MLM: Fundamental Ratings
EXP
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5928
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7437
SMR RATING
1..100
3439
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5439
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EXP's Valuation (31) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLM (80). This means that EXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EXP (74). This means that MLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than EXP’s over the last 12 months.

EXP's SMR Rating (34) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (39). This means that EXP’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (59). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as EXP (54). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to EXP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EXPMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EXP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSCI25.13-0.01
-0.04%
Nuveen Securitized Income ETF
SNT.X0.007188-0.000137
-1.87%
Status cryptocurrency
PENDLE.X1.459429-0.076511
-4.98%
Pendle cryptocurrency
CHR.X0.014306-0.000830
-5.48%
Chromia cryptocurrency
REI.X0.002354-0.001604
-40.52%
REI Network cryptocurrency

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
-1.45%
VMC - MLM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
CRH - MLM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
EXP - MLM
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
TTAM - MLM
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
AMRZ - MLM
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
More