BCH
Price
$41.35
Change
-$0.90 (-2.13%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
20.57B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WF
Price
$68.93
Change
-$1.37 (-1.95%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
17.2B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCH vs WF

BCH vs WF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCH vs. WF commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCH is a Hold and WF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BCH: $41.35 vs. WF: $68.93)
Brand notoriety: BCH and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCH: 114% vs. WF: 61%
Market capitalization -- BCH: $20.57B vs. WF: $17.2B
BCH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.57B. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $17.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BCH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than BCH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the short-term than BCH.

Price Growth

BCH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCH is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCH($20.6B) has a higher market cap than WF($17.2B). BCH has higher P/E ratio than WF: BCH (16.13) vs WF (8.20). BCH YTD gains are higher at: 22.939 vs. WF (17.987). BCH has less debt than WF: BCH (13.49T) vs WF (88.7T). WF has higher revenues than BCH: WF (13.49T) vs BCH (3.11T).
BCHWFBCH / WF
Capitalization20.6B17.2B120%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.93917.987128%
P/E Ratio16.138.20197%
Revenue3.11T13.49T23%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt13.49T88.7T15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCH vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
BCH
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4017
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1728
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WF's Valuation (16) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCH (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCH’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (2) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (1) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (41) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (28) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMTK0.220.01
+4.82%
SmartKem Inc.
EGG3.650.05
+1.39%
Enigmatig Ltd
LEGH26.260.01
+0.04%
Legacy Housing Corp
IFF79.22-0.26
-0.33%
International Flavors & Fragrances
MMS60.25-0.39
-0.64%
MAXIMUS

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
-1.95%
SHG - WF
82%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
KB - WF
80%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
DB - WF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
BCH - WF
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
ITUB - WF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More