BCS
Price
$20.27
Change
-$0.28 (-1.36%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
71.65B
67 days until earnings call
SMFG
Price
$17.13
Change
+$0.38 (+2.27%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
111.79B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCS vs SMFG

Header iconBCS vs SMFG Comparison
Open Charts BCS vs SMFGBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$20.27
Change-$0.28 (-1.36%)
Volume$12.67M
Capitalization71.65B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$17.13
Change+$0.38 (+2.27%)
Volume$2.61M
Capitalization111.79B
BCS vs SMFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. SMFG commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a Hold and SMFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BCS: $20.27 vs. SMFG: $17.13)
Brand notoriety: BCS: Notable vs. SMFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 80% vs. SMFG: 132%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $71.65B vs. SMFG: $111.79B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $71.65B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $111.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $798.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $130.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the long-term than SMFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the short-term than BCS.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.65% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was +7.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.71% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFG($112B) has a higher market cap than BCS($71.6B). SMFG has higher P/E ratio than BCS: SMFG (13.79) vs BCS (9.21). BCS YTD gains are higher at: 56.496 vs. SMFG (18.219). SMFG has higher revenues than BCS: SMFG (5.11T) vs BCS (27.8B).
BCSSMFGBCS / SMFG
Capitalization71.6B112B64%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD56.49618.219310%
P/E Ratio9.2113.7967%
Revenue27.8B5.11T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A31.54T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1915
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
912
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4734
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (65) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (75). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (12). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (4). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (43). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (47). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYI12.040.03
+0.25%
Western Asset High Yield Opportunity Fund Inc
JSMD80.36-0.09
-0.11%
Janus Henderson Small/Md Cp Gr Alpha ETF
MYCN24.57-0.03
-0.11%
SPDR SSGA My2034 Corporate Bond ETF
DIVY25.71-0.11
-0.43%
Sound Equity Dividend Income ETF
VLUE116.95-0.97
-0.82%
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
+2.27%
MUFG - SMFG
82%
Closely correlated
+3.65%
BCS - SMFG
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
C - SMFG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
WFC - SMFG
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
HSBC - SMFG
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
More