BCSF
Price
$12.13
Change
+$0.07 (+0.58%)
Updated
Aug 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
782.31M
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOAH
Price
$8.68
Change
-$0.12 (-1.36%)
Updated
Aug 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
604.08M
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BCSF vs NOAH

BCSF vs NOAH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCSF vs. NOAH commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCSF is a Hold and NOAH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2026
Stock price -- (BCSF: $12.06 vs. NOAH: $8.80)
Brand notoriety: BCSF and NOAH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCSF: 107% vs. NOAH: 87%
Market capitalization -- BCSF: $782.31M vs. NOAH: $604.08M
BCSF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $782.31M. NOAH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $604.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOAH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NOAH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCSF is a better buy in the long-term than NOAH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOAH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NOAH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOAH is a better buy in the short-term than BCSF.

Price Growth

BCSF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.90% price change this week, while NOAH (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

NOAH is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+4.01% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCSF($782M) has a higher market cap than NOAH($604M). BCSF has higher P/E ratio than NOAH: BCSF (12.18) vs NOAH (7.76). NOAH YTD gains are higher at: -6.372 vs. BCSF (-7.222). NOAH has higher revenues than BCSF: NOAH (2.62B) vs BCSF (88.7M).
BCSFNOAHBCSF / NOAH
Capitalization782M604M129%
EBITDAN/A827M-
Gain YTD-7.222-6.372113%
P/E Ratio12.187.76157%
Revenue88.7M2.62B3%
Total Cash16.6MN/A-
Total Debt1.46BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCSF vs NOAH: Fundamental Ratings
BCSF
NOAH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55100
SMR RATING
1..100
7082
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7072
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2287
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCSF's Valuation (6) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOAH (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOAH (100) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's SMR Rating (70) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as NOAH (82) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew similarly to NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's Price Growth Rating (70) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is in the same range as NOAH (72) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew similarly to NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

BCSF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Investment Trusts Or Mutual Funds industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOAH (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOAH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSFNOAH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOAH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TFOIX47.511.25
+2.70%
Transamerica Capital Growth I
FFBGX43.270.21
+0.49%
American Funds Global Balanced 529-F-3
ACBYX16.300.07
+0.43%
American Beacon Balanced Y
GLRBX25.330.07
+0.28%
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow R
JLPZX20.460.05
+0.24%
JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus R2

BCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCSF has been closely correlated with OCSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCSF jumps, then OCSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCSF
1D Price
Change %
BCSF100%
-0.33%
OCSL - BCSF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
ARCC - BCSF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
NCDL - BCSF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
NMFC - BCSF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
CGBD - BCSF
66%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
More