BEAT
Price
$1.64
Change
-$0.04 (-2.38%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
57.13M
62 days until earnings call
FICO
Price
$1771.90
Change
+$16.87 (+0.96%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
31.06B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEAT vs FICO

Header iconBEAT vs FICO Comparison
Open Charts BEAT vs FICOBanner chart's image
Heartbeam
Price$1.64
Change-$0.04 (-2.38%)
Volume$191.67K
Capitalization57.13M
Fair Isaac
Price$1771.90
Change+$16.87 (+0.96%)
Volume$162.03K
Capitalization31.06B
BEAT vs FICO Comparison Chart
Loading...
BEAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FICO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BEAT vs. FICO commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEAT is a Hold and FICO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BEAT: $1.63 vs. FICO: $1771.90)
Brand notoriety: BEAT and FICO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BEAT: 255% vs. FICO: 67%
Market capitalization -- BEAT: $57.13M vs. FICO: $31.06B
BEAT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $57.13M. FICO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $31.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BEAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFICO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BEAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FICO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FICO is a better buy in the long-term than BEAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BEAT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FICO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BEAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FICO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FICO is a better buy in the short-term than BEAT.

Price Growth

BEAT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.84% price change this week, while FICO (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

BEAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

FICO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.53% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FICO($31.1B) has a higher market cap than BEAT($57.1M). BEAT has higher P/E ratio than FICO: BEAT (149.25) vs FICO (70.12). FICO YTD gains are higher at: -11.001 vs. BEAT (-29.130). FICO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 676M vs. BEAT (-15.31M). FICO has more cash in the bank: 160M vs. BEAT (16.2M). BEAT has less debt than FICO: BEAT (5.42M) vs FICO (1.99B). FICO has higher revenues than BEAT: FICO (1.55B) vs BEAT (0).
BEATFICOBEAT / FICO
Capitalization57.1M31.1B0%
EBITDA-15.31M676M-2%
Gain YTD-29.130-11.001265%
P/E Ratio149.2570.12213%
Revenue01.55B-
Total Cash16.2M160M10%
Total Debt5.42M1.99B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BEAT vs FICO: Fundamental Ratings
BEAT
FICO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
559
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10025
SMR RATING
1..100
9710
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
442
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BEAT's Valuation (80) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as FICO (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BEAT’s stock grew similarly to FICO’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for BEAT (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew significantly faster than BEAT’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's SMR Rating (10) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for BEAT (97) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew significantly faster than BEAT’s over the last 12 months.

FICO's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BEAT (88) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that FICO’s stock grew similarly to BEAT’s over the last 12 months.

BEAT's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FICO (42) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BEAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FICO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BEATFICO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BEAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FICO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMST2.980.06
+2.05%
Amesite
CGEN1.720.01
+0.58%
Compugen Ltd
REPX26.470.06
+0.23%
Riley Exploration Permian
FND72.50-0.83
-1.13%
Floor & Decor Holdings
ABM51.26-1.07
-2.04%
ABM Industries

BEAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BEAT and SNOW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BEAT and SNOW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEAT
1D Price
Change %
BEAT100%
-2.98%
SNOW - BEAT
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
ALKT - BEAT
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
EVCM - BEAT
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
FICO - BEAT
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
AEYE - BEAT
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.56%
More

FICO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FICO has been loosely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FICO jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FICO
1D Price
Change %
FICO100%
+0.96%
PANW - FICO
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
WIX - FICO
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QTWO - FICO
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
CPAY - FICO
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
COIN - FICO
45%
Loosely correlated
-4.61%
More