BEN
Price
$34.63
Change
+$0.31 (+0.90%)
Updated
Aug 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.43B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FHI
Price
$64.75
Change
+$1.05 (+1.65%)
Updated
Aug 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.76B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEN vs FHI

BEN vs FHI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BEN vs. FHI commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEN is a Hold and FHI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2026
Stock price -- (BEN: $34.31 vs. FHI: $63.70)
Brand notoriety: BEN and FHI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BEN: 137% vs. FHI: 77%
Market capitalization -- BEN: $17.43B vs. FHI: $4.76B
BEN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.43B. FHI’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BEN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFHI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BEN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FHI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the long-term than BEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BEN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FHI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the short-term than BEN.

Price Growth

BEN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.33% price change this week, while FHI (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

BEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

FHI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.91% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BEN($17.4B) has a higher market cap than FHI($4.76B). BEN has higher P/E ratio than FHI: BEN (23.34) vs FHI (11.84). BEN YTD gains are higher at: 47.178 vs. FHI (24.752). BEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.83B vs. FHI (592M). FHI has less debt than BEN: FHI (452M) vs BEN (15.4B). BEN has higher revenues than FHI: BEN (9.03B) vs FHI (1.93B).
BENFHIBEN / FHI
Capitalization17.4B4.76B366%
EBITDA1.83B592M309%
Gain YTD47.17824.752191%
P/E Ratio23.3411.84197%
Revenue9.03B1.93B467%
Total Cash276MN/A-
Total Debt15.4B452M3,407%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BEN vs FHI: Fundamental Ratings
BEN
FHI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9220
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
578
SMR RATING
1..100
8230
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9547
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BEN's Valuation (10) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHI (68) in the null industry. This means that BEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (57) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (82) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FHI (43) in the null industry. This means that BEN’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (95) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BENFHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FHI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSNF31.520.39
+1.25%
Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF
VPL115.111.01
+0.89%
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
PXI63.940.53
+0.84%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Energy MomentumETF
THIR34.220.18
+0.53%
THOR Index Rotation ETF
ROUS68.070.30
+0.44%
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF

BEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BEN has been closely correlated with AMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BEN jumps, then AMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEN
1D Price
Change %
BEN100%
+1.00%
AMP - BEN
68%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
IVZ - BEN
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
PFG - BEN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
CG - BEN
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.88%
BAM - BEN
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
More

FHI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHI has been loosely correlated with VRTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FHI jumps, then VRTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FHI
1D Price
Change %
FHI100%
+0.90%
VRTS - FHI
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
IVZ - FHI
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
BEN - FHI
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
APAM - FHI
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
BLK - FHI
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
More