BHM
Price
$12.74
Change
+$0.03 (+0.24%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
65.45M
FRT
Price
$95.80
Change
+$0.88 (+0.93%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.36B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHM vs FRT

Header iconBHM vs FRT Comparison
Open Charts BHM vs FRTBanner chart's image
Bluerock Homes Trust
Price$12.74
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
Volume$2.71K
Capitalization65.45M
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$95.80
Change+$0.88 (+0.93%)
Volume$558.33K
Capitalization8.36B
BHM vs FRT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHM vs. FRT commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHM is a Hold and FRT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BHM: $12.74 vs. FRT: $95.80)
Brand notoriety: BHM and FRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHM: 91% vs. FRT: 85%
Market capitalization -- BHM: $65.45M vs. FRT: $8.36B
BHM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $65.45M. FRT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $8.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHM is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than BHM.

Price Growth

BHM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.91% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHM is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

FRT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.39% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($8.36B) has a higher market cap than BHM($65.5M). BHM YTD gains are higher at: -2.031 vs. FRT (-11.570). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 737M vs. BHM (16.6M). FRT has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. BHM (80.2M). BHM has less debt than FRT: BHM (167M) vs FRT (4.69B). FRT has higher revenues than BHM: FRT (1.13B) vs BHM (41.1M).
BHMFRTBHM / FRT
Capitalization65.5M8.36B1%
EBITDA16.6M737M2%
Gain YTD-2.031-11.57018%
P/E RatioN/A35.98-
Revenue41.1M1.13B4%
Total Cash80.2M251M32%
Total Debt167M4.69B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHMFRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEEFX88.490.81
+0.92%
American Funds Fundamental Invs 529-F-3
FTVNX35.040.15
+0.43%
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Val Investor
OCMAX22.760.06
+0.26%
OCM Gold Atlas
NRIQX14.940.03
+0.20%
Neuberger Berman International Eq R6
TGIRX31.82-0.08
-0.25%
Thornburg International Equity R6

BHM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHM and WSR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHM and WSR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHM
1D Price
Change %
BHM100%
+0.24%
WSR - BHM
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
CTO - BHM
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
IRM - BHM
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
FRT - BHM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
EPR - BHM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
More

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
+0.93%
KIM - FRT
87%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
KRG - FRT
86%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
REG - FRT
86%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
AKR - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
BRX - FRT
82%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
More