BHM
Price
$12.78
Change
-$0.15 (-1.16%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
52.63M
FRT
Price
$102.67
Change
+$1.68 (+1.66%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.86B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHM vs FRT

Header iconBHM vs FRT Comparison
Open Charts BHM vs FRTBanner chart's image
Bluerock Homes Trust
Price$12.78
Change-$0.15 (-1.16%)
Volume$1.31K
Capitalization52.63M
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$102.67
Change+$1.68 (+1.66%)
Volume$638.34K
Capitalization8.86B
BHM vs FRT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHM vs. FRT commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHM is a Buy and FRT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BHM: $12.78 vs. FRT: $102.67)
Brand notoriety: BHM and FRT are both not notable
BHM represents the Media Conglomerates, while FRT is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHM: 76% vs. FRT: 78%
Market capitalization -- BHM: $52.63M vs. FRT: $8.86B
BHM [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $52.63M. FRT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $8.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.82B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.65B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the long-term than BHM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than BHM.

Price Growth

BHM (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.81%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (-0.20% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.88% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($8.86B) has a higher market cap than BHM($52.6M). BHM YTD gains are higher at: -1.723 vs. FRT (-5.229). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 883M vs. BHM (34.4M). FRT has more cash in the bank: 177M vs. BHM (128M). BHM has less debt than FRT: BHM (339M) vs FRT (4.57B). FRT has higher revenues than BHM: FRT (1.24B) vs BHM (59.7M).
BHMFRTBHM / FRT
Capitalization52.6M8.86B1%
EBITDA34.4M883M4%
Gain YTD-1.723-5.22933%
P/E RatioN/A25.57-
Revenue59.7M1.24B5%
Total Cash128M177M72%
Total Debt339M4.57B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHMFRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSHFX65.700.15
+0.23%
American Funds Washington Mutual F1
HCYAX18.48N/A
N/A
Hilton Tactical Income Inv
MFWLX17.76N/A
N/A
MFS Global Total Return R6
FCENX14.07N/A
N/A
Franklin International Core Equity Adv
JAWWX125.87-0.20
-0.16%
Janus Henderson Global Research T

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
+1.66%
KIM - FRT
87%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
KRG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
BRX - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
More