BHM
Price
$12.40
Change
-$0.10 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
65.45M
FRT
Price
$105.39
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.36B
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BHM vs FRT

Header iconBHM vs FRT Comparison
Open Charts BHM vs FRTBanner chart's image
Bluerock Homes Trust
Price$12.40
Change-$0.10 (-0.80%)
Volume$9.41K
Capitalization65.45M
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$105.39
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$546.38K
Capitalization8.36B
BHM vs FRT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHM vs. FRT commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHM is a Hold and FRT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BHM: $12.40 vs. FRT: $105.39)
Brand notoriety: BHM and FRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHM: 157% vs. FRT: 86%
Market capitalization -- BHM: $65.45M vs. FRT: $8.36B
BHM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $65.45M. FRT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $8.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHM is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHM is a better buy in the short-term than FRT.

Price Growth

BHM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -6.91% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHM is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.

FRT is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+2.35% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($8.36B) has a higher market cap than BHM($65.5M). FRT YTD gains are higher at: -4.926 vs. BHM (-6.556). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 737M vs. BHM (16.6M). FRT has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. BHM (80.2M). BHM has less debt than FRT: BHM (167M) vs FRT (4.69B). FRT has higher revenues than BHM: FRT (1.13B) vs BHM (41.1M).
BHMFRTBHM / FRT
Capitalization65.5M8.36B1%
EBITDA16.6M737M2%
Gain YTD-6.556-4.926133%
P/E RatioN/A35.98-
Revenue41.1M1.13B4%
Total Cash80.2M251M32%
Total Debt167M4.69B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRT: Fundamental Ratings
FRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
70
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHMFRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BHM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABNB135.122.96
+2.24%
Airbnb
CRMT46.230.73
+1.60%
America's Car-Mart
GIC24.960.14
+0.56%
Global Industrial Company
CACC484.822.58
+0.54%
Credit Acceptance Corp
ITRG0.80N/A
-0.35%
Integra Resources Corp

BHM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHM and WSR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHM and WSR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHM
1D Price
Change %
BHM100%
-0.80%
WSR - BHM
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
CTO - BHM
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
IRM - BHM
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
FRT - BHM
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EPR - BHM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
More

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with REG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then REG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
N/A
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
KIM - FRT
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
KRG - FRT
81%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
BRX - FRT
80%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
UE - FRT
78%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
More