It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BILI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTES’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BILI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTES’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BILI (@Packaged Software) experienced а -18.99% price change this week, while NTES (@Packaged Software) price change was +11.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
BILI is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
NTES is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BILI | NTES | BILI / NTES | |
Capitalization | 4.65B | 67.1B | 7% |
EBITDA | -1.67B | 28.4B | -6% |
Gain YTD | 50.370 | -6.306 | -799% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.53 | - |
Revenue | 22.5B | 102B | 22% |
Total Cash | 15B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 7.65B | N/A | - |
BILI | NTES | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTES's Valuation (6) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BILI (36). This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to BILI’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BILI (96). This means that NTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than BILI’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's SMR Rating (41) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BILI (92). This means that NTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than BILI’s over the last 12 months.
BILI's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as NTES (60). This means that BILI’s stock grew similarly to NTES’s over the last 12 months.
NTES's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as BILI (100). This means that NTES’s stock grew similarly to BILI’s over the last 12 months.
BILI | NTES | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago86% | 3 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 14 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago66% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GTO | 46.81 | -0.04 | -0.09% |
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | |||
IYLD | 20.10 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Inc ETF | |||
EMMF | 26.81 | -0.04 | -0.14% |
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Mltfctr | |||
DYLG | 29.71 | -0.10 | -0.32% |
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & GrowthETF | |||
QVAL | 45.50 | -0.65 | -1.41% |
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Val ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BILI has been loosely correlated with KC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BILI jumps, then KC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BILI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BILI | 100% | -1.56% | ||
KC - BILI | 57% Loosely correlated | +8.60% | ||
YMM - BILI | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
NTES - BILI | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
RIOT - BILI | 43% Loosely correlated | +4.26% | ||
CLSK - BILI | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTES has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTES jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NTES | 100% | +1.51% | ||
BILI - NTES | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
KC - NTES | 43% Loosely correlated | +8.60% | ||
YMM - NTES | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
NETTF - NTES | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.28% | ||
SOHU - NTES | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More |