Investors tracking the oilfield services and energy-equipment sector often compare BKR and NOV because both derive substantial revenue from upstream oil and gas activity, yet pursue notably different business models. Baker Hughes has evolved into a diversified energy technology company, while NOV Inc. remains a pure-play manufacturer of drilling and production equipment. This stock comparison is most relevant for traders and investors seeking to understand how relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning differ between a broad-based energy firm and a specialized equipment supplier amid shifting global drilling activity and energy-demand trends.
Baker Hughes Company operates through two primary segments: Oilfield Services & Equipment (OFSE) and Industrial & Energy Technology (IET). In recent market activity, BKR has benefited from strength in IET, which supplies gas turbines, compressors, and liquefaction equipment for LNG projects, data centers, and power generation. Management has reported record full-year orders and a record backlog in this segment, supporting the company's strategic shift toward less cyclical, production-oriented revenue.
Recent results highlighted record adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) and free cash flow, even as overall revenue remained roughly flat year over year. Softness in the OFSE segment has been offset by IET momentum, and analysts have noted upward estimate revisions following the latest report. This diversification has contributed to relatively stable sentiment compared with more drilling-sensitive peers.
NOV Inc. designs, manufactures, and services equipment for drilling, completion, and production across the global energy industry. In recent weeks, NOV has shown resilience in its Energy Equipment segment, which has grown revenue for several consecutive years on strong offshore and international demand, while its shorter-cycle Energy Products & Services segment has faced pressure from lower global drilling activity.
The company has emphasized exceptional cash generation, converting a high percentage of EBITDA into free cash flow and maintaining a low-leverage balance sheet. However, recent results were also marked by goodwill and long-lived asset impairments and a higher effective tax rate, which weighed on reported earnings. Management has signaled a cautious near-term outlook, expecting modestly lower revenue and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) as customers keep budgets weighted toward the back half of the year.
Tickeron operates a broad marketplace of AI-driven trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers using distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk profiles. Within this universe, only the most suitable strategies for current market conditions are highlighted in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots differ meaningfully in trading style, holding period, performance statistics, and the specific set of tickers they monitor, allowing traders to evaluate options aligned with their own objectives. The section is designed to surface strategies demonstrating notable relative strength under prevailing conditions rather than a static list. Investors and traders interested in automated, data-driven approaches may find it useful to review the currently featured Trending AI Robots.
The clearest contrast between BKR and NOV lies in revenue composition. Baker Hughes blends cyclical oilfield services with a fast-growing industrial and energy technology franchise tied to natural gas, LNG, and power infrastructure. NOV, by contrast, is more concentrated in drilling and production equipment, giving it higher sensitivity to rig counts and capital-equipment ordering cycles.
On growth drivers, BKR is positioned around long-duration gas and power demand, reflected in a large and expanding backlog. NOV is positioned around offshore recovery and international spending, with management citing improving offshore indicators into the second half of the year. Risk profiles also differ: BKR carries broader macro diversification, while NOV faces tariff and inflationary cost pressures alongside a more activity-dependent demand outlook. From a market-sentiment perspective, BKR has generally shown steadier relative momentum, while NOV trades at a lower valuation multiple consistent with its more cyclical earnings base.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, backlog durability, diversification, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor BKR over NOV in the current environment. Baker Hughes' record order book and growing industrial-energy exposure suggest more stable, less cyclical earnings momentum, while NOV's near-term guidance points to softer activity ahead despite strong cash generation. This assessment reflects probabilistic analysis of recent performance and structural positioning rather than a definitive forecast, and conditions could shift as energy-market fundamentals evolve.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
BKR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 25 of 32 cases where BKR's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where BKR's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 27 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +5.62% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BKR advanced for three days, in 227 of 342 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 30, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on BKR as a result. In 55 of 84 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for BKR turned negative on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 33 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 67%.
BKR moved below its 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BKR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.
The Aroon Indicator for BKR entered a downward trend on October 26, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 53 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. BKR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 64 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.387) is normal, around the industry mean (1.488). P/E Ratio (15.245) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-21.917). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.593) is also within normal values, averaging (1.687). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (0.043) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.020) is also within normal values, averaging (1.663).
The RSI Oscillator for NOV moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 24 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 21 of the 24 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 88%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +4.00% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NOV advanced for three days, in 233 of 314 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
NOV may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 02, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on NOV as a result. In 63 of 94 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NOV turned negative on November 03, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 53 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 32 of the 53 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 60%.
NOV moved below its 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NOV declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Aroon Indicator for NOV entered a downward trend on October 28, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NOV’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NOV’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 73, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 76 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.009) is normal, around the industry mean (1.488). P/E Ratio (65.037) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-21.917). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.787) is also within normal values, averaging (1.687). Dividend Yield (0.021) settles around the average of (0.043) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.873) is also within normal values, averaging (1.663).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
BKR | NOV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BKR's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as NOV (76) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that BKR’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.
BKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOV (74) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that BKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOV’s over the last 12 months.
BKR's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOV (89) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that BKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOV’s over the last 12 months.
NOV's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as BKR (63) in the null industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew similarly to BKR’s over the last 12 months.
NOV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BKR (56) in the null industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew somewhat faster than BKR’s over the last 12 months.
| BKR | NOV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 66% | 14 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 56% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BKR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while NOV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BKR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BKR (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -13.33% price change this week, while NOV (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -8.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -11.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.35%.
BKR is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2027.
NOV is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2027.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BKR has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BKR jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOV has been closely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOV jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| HAL - NOV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| SLB - NOV | 73% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| BKR - NOV | 70% Closely correlated | +3.61% | ||
| INVX - NOV | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| WFRD - NOV | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AGMI | 63.12 | 1.26 | +2.04% |
| Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) | |||
| LMBS | 49.14 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
| First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF (LMBS) | |||
| EDGF | 24.54 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) | |||
| TDSB | 24.67 | N/A | +0.02% |
| ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF (TDSB) | |||
| BSMY | 23.85 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco BulletShares 2034 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMY) | |||