Baker Hughes Company (BKR) and NOV Inc. (NOV) are key players in the oilfield services and energy equipment sector, providing essential technologies and components for drilling, production, and energy transition. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market performance, business drivers, and relative positioning amid fluctuating oil prices and sector shifts toward cleaner energy. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing energy exposure will find value in understanding their contrasts in growth trajectories and risk profiles, particularly in recent market activity.
Baker Hughes Company (BKR) is a leading energy technology firm offering solutions in oilfield services, industrial solutions, and clean energy technologies, with a focus on reducing emissions and innovating for lower-carbon operations. In recent weeks, BKR shares have shown resilience, trading around $59-62, with a roughly 4% gain over the past 30 days and strong year-to-date advances near 30%. Sentiment has been bolstered by robust fourth-quarter 2025 results, including $7 billion in revenue that exceeded expectations and positive full-year execution, alongside strategic divestitures like Waygate Technologies. These factors have driven upward price momentum despite broader energy sector volatility tied to oil dependency.
NOV Inc. (NOV) specializes in designing, manufacturing, and supporting drilling, completion, and production equipment for the global energy industry, including energy transition solutions. Shares have traded near $19 recently, reflecting year-to-date gains of about 23% and solid one-year returns around 59%, though with patchier short-term momentum. Performance in recent market activity has been influenced by a Q4 2025 earnings miss, with EPS (earnings per share) of -$0.02 against expectations of $0.25, and slightly declining annual revenue. While the company maintains a strong position in upstream equipment, investor sentiment reflects caution amid revenue pressures and sector competition.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and volatility plays, with impressive stats: annualized returns from +15% to +168%, win rates of 54-88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Timeframes range from minutes to months, including energy-focused bots with returns over +80% on oil and precious metals tickers. Ideal for current conditions, they offer real-time signals and risk management for copy trading. Explore these high-potential options to enhance your strategy.
Both BKR and NOV serve the oil and gas equipment sector, but BKR differentiates through broader clean energy exposure and technology innovation, while NOV focuses on core drilling and production hardware. Growth drivers favor BKR with consistent revenue beats and emissions tech, contrasting NOV's revenue dip. Recent momentum tilts to BKR, up 35% over 12 months versus NOV's 24%. Risk factors include oil price sensitivity for both, though BKR shows higher stability. Market sentiment leans positive on BKR due to strategic deals, while NOV faces earnings scrutiny.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BKR over NOV based on superior trend consistency, stronger YTD momentum, and positive catalysts like earnings beats and tech diversification. While NOV offers value in equipment demand, BKR's relative stability and growth positioning suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BKR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BKR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BKR (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while NOV (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +5.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +4.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +127.01%.
BKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
NOV is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
| BKR | NOV | BKR / NOV | |
| Capitalization | 62.6B | 7.58B | 826% |
| EBITDA | 5.1B | 735M | 694% |
| Gain YTD | 39.636 | 37.041 | 107% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.17 | 84.52 | 24% |
| Revenue | 27.9B | 8.69B | 321% |
| Total Cash | 14.8B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 16.2B | 2.34B | 693% |
BKR | NOV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BKR's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NOV (34) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that BKR’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.
BKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOV (75) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that BKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOV’s over the last 12 months.
BKR's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOV (91) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that BKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOV’s over the last 12 months.
BKR's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NOV (42) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that BKR’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.
NOV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as BKR (19) in the null industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew similarly to BKR’s over the last 12 months.
| BKR | NOV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 24 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOV has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOV jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOV | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| SLB - NOV | 71% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| HAL - NOV | 69% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| BKR - NOV | 66% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| INVX - NOV | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| WFRD - NOV | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||