BLK
Price
$967.05
Change
+$7.87 (+0.82%)
Updated
May 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
124.17B
65 days until earnings call
IVZ
Price
$15.47
Change
-$0.18 (-1.15%)
Updated
May 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.41B
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLK vs IVZ

Header iconBLK vs IVZ Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs IVZBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$967.05
Change+$7.87 (+0.82%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization124.17B
Inves
Price$15.47
Change-$0.18 (-1.15%)
Volume$38.72K
Capitalization7.41B
BLK vs IVZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. IVZ commentary
May 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a StrongBuy and IVZ is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BLK: $959.18 vs. IVZ: $15.65)
Brand notoriety: BLK and IVZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 66% vs. IVZ: 69%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $124.17B vs. IVZ: $7.41B
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $124.17B. IVZ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIVZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IVZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the long-term than IVZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IVZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the short-term than IVZ.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.83% price change this week, while IVZ (@Investment Managers) price change was +10.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.87% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($124B) has a higher market cap than IVZ($7.41B). BLK has higher P/E ratio than IVZ: BLK (22.65) vs IVZ (12.27). BLK YTD gains are higher at: -5.921 vs. IVZ (-9.462). BLK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.87B vs. IVZ (1.13B). BLK has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. IVZ (1.93B). IVZ has less debt than BLK: IVZ (9.05B) vs BLK (9.7B). BLK has higher revenues than IVZ: BLK (17.9B) vs IVZ (5.72B).
BLKIVZBLK / IVZ
Capitalization124B7.41B1,674%
EBITDA7.87B1.13B696%
Gain YTD-5.921-9.46263%
P/E Ratio22.6512.27185%
Revenue17.9B5.72B313%
Total Cash10.6B1.93B549%
Total Debt9.7B9.05B107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs IVZ: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
IVZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2122
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2954
SMR RATING
1..100
5582
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3279
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVZ's Valuation (31) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (88). This means that IVZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (54). This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's SMR Rating (55) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (82). This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (50). This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVZ (79). This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKIVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMG59.002.00
+3.51%
Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (The)
SLF62.42-0.04
-0.06%
Sun Life Financial
SCHL18.75-0.10
-0.53%
Scholastic Corp
TTEC5.20-0.12
-2.26%
TTEC Holdings
CLNN2.64-0.08
-2.94%
Clene Inc.

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
+0.12%
IVZ - BLK
78%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
STT - BLK
76%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
BN - BLK
76%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
JHG - BLK
75%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
BX - BLK
75%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
More

IVZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVZ has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVZ jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVZ
1D Price
Change %
IVZ100%
+0.38%
JHG - IVZ
84%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
AMG - IVZ
81%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
BN - IVZ
79%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
CG - IVZ
78%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
KKR - IVZ
76%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
More