BLK
Price
$1062.40
Change
-$9.63 (-0.90%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
164.53B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CG
Price
$43.07
Change
-$1.04 (-2.36%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
15.35B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLK vs CG

BLK vs CG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. CG commentary
Sep 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a Buy and CG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 11, 2026
Stock price -- (BLK: $1062.40 vs. CG: $43.07)
Brand notoriety: BLK and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 56% vs. CG: 89%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $164.53B vs. CG: $15.35B
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $164.53B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $15.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $57 to $164.53B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the long-term than CG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BLK is a better buy in the short-term than CG.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.18% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was -9.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2026.

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.63% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($165B) has a higher market cap than CG($15.3B). CG has higher P/E ratio than BLK: CG (44.86) vs BLK (25.46). BLK YTD gains are higher at: 0.888 vs. CG (-25.598). CG (14.3B) and BLK (15B) have identical debt. BLK has higher revenues than CG: BLK (27.3B) vs CG (2.78B).
BLKCGBLK / CG
Capitalization165B15.3B1,078%
EBITDA11.2BN/A-
Gain YTD0.888-25.598-3%
P/E Ratio25.4644.8657%
Revenue27.3B2.78B983%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt15B14.3B105%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6096
SMR RATING
1..100
6358
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5070
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
476
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CG's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (69). This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (96). This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (58) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (63). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (70). This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (47). This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
BLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TD120.141.00
+0.84%
Toronto Dominion Bank
IGC0.28N/A
+0.53%
IGC Pharma
ATEC8.84-0.14
-1.61%
Alphatec Holdings
TMCI4.35-0.18
-3.97%
Treace Medical Concepts
GDS31.06-1.33
-4.11%
GDS Holdings Limited

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
-0.90%
IVZ - BLK
69%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
BX - BLK
66%
Closely correlated
-2.84%
KKR - BLK
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.09%
BAM - BLK
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
CG - BLK
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
More

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-2.36%
TPG - CG
80%
Closely correlated
-4.05%
KKR - CG
76%
Closely correlated
-3.09%
BX - CG
75%
Closely correlated
-2.84%
BN - CG
73%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
APO - CG
70%
Closely correlated
-2.34%
More