Advertisement
BLK vs STT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? BlackRock (BLK) vs. State Street (STT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both BLK and STT delivered strong Q1 2026 earnings, with profit growth driven by asset inflows and fee income.
- STT has outperformed in recent market activity, with year-to-date gains of about 11.7% compared to BLK's 1.5%.
- BLK boasts significantly larger assets under management (AUM), at $14 trillion versus STT's $5.6 trillion.
- STT benefits from $54.5 trillion in assets under custody and administration (AUC/A), highlighting its custody banking strength.
- Over the past year, STT returned approximately 79%, far exceeding BLK's 22%.
- Analyst sentiment remains positive for both, with price target upgrades following earnings.
Introduction
BLK and STT are leading players in asset management and custody services, making them compelling comparables for investors eyeing the financial sector. BLK, the world's largest asset manager, focuses on investment products like ETFs, while STT emphasizes custody banking alongside management. This comparison suits traders monitoring relative performance amid market volatility, interest rate shifts, and inflows into passive strategies. With both firms reporting robust recent earnings, understanding their business models, momentum, and risk profiles aids decisions on sector exposure and portfolio positioning in the current environment.
BLK Overview and Recent Performance
BlackRock (BLK) is the global leader in asset management, overseeing $14 trillion in AUM as of recent quarters, including $5.5 trillion in ETFs. Its business thrives on fee-based revenues from diverse strategies, bolstered by technology like Aladdin. In recent market activity, BLK shares have shown resilience, trading around $1,048 with a trailing P/E of 26.4. Q1 2026 earnings highlighted revenue of $6.7 billion and strong ETF inflows, driving a post-earnings uptick amid ongoing share buybacks. Sentiment has improved with analyst upgrades, though year-to-date performance lags broader indices due to earlier sector pressures. Key influences include market gains and active ETF growth, positioning BLK for long-term stability.
STT Overview and Recent Performance
State Street Corporation (STT) operates as a custody bank and asset manager, with $5.6 trillion in AUM and $54.5 trillion in AUC/A. It generates income from net interest (NII) and servicing fees. Shares recently traded near $142, with a lower P/E of 15.1 reflecting value traits. Recent quarters saw AUM rise 20% year-over-year, fueled by market appreciation and inflows. Q1 2026 results featured $3.8 billion in revenue, up 16%, and EPS of $2.84, beating estimates and lifting shares over 17% in the prior month. Positive factors include capital returns and ETF servicing expansions, enhancing sentiment despite sensitivity to rates.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 350 available, each trained on thousands of tickers across diverse styles like swing trading, trend following, and leveraged ETFs. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from 15% to over 167%, win rates of 55-87%, and profit factors above 1.5 for many leaders. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots with 65-75% win rates and energy agents hitting 81% returns. Strategies vary by timeframe (5min to daily) and risk profiles, adapting to current volatility. Traders can explore these for automated signals suited to today's markets—visit Trending AI Robots to review performance and copy top performers.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BLK and STT share financial sector exposure but differ in models: BLK emphasizes pure asset management with scale advantages, while STT blends custody for diversified fees less tied to markets. Growth drivers contrast—BLK via ETF dominance, STT through NII and servicing amid rising rates. Recent momentum favors STT, with superior one-year returns, though BLK offers greater stability. Risks include rate sensitivity for both NII, but STT faces custody competition. Market sentiment tilts toward STT's value pricing versus BLK's premium valuation.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward STT based on stronger trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative outperformance in recent activity. Factors like 79% one-year gains and custody scale provide probabilistic edge over BLK's steadier but lagging positioning, amid favorable fee growth.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a Hold and STT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 5 green FA rating(s).
- BLK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STT’s FA Score: 5 green, 0 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- STT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.27% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLK is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
STT is expected to report earnings on Jul 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-1.59% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BLK | STT | BLK / STT | |
| Capitalization | 168B | 42.3B | 397% |
| EBITDA | 10.6B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.643 | 20.052 | 8% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.23 | 15.52 | 175% |
| Revenue | 25.6B | 14.5B | 177% |
| Total Cash | 13.1B | 4.43B | 296% |
| Total Debt | 15B | 29.2B | 51% |
BLK | STT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 19 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 20 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STT's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (73) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BLK (50) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
STT's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (64) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BLK (43) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
STT's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BLK (34) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
| BLK | STT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 59% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 57% | 15 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
STT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.