Comparing BLK and STT brings two of the most influential financial institutions in the world into focus. BlackRock and State Street both sit at the center of the global capital markets ecosystem, yet they serve investors through meaningfully different business models. BlackRock derives the majority of its revenue from investment management and advisory fees tied to its enormous AUM base, while State Street generates substantial income from custody, fund administration, and securities servicing. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to the financial sector's structural growth themes — including the rise of ETFs (Exchange-Traded Funds), private markets expansion, and the increasing complexity of global asset servicing — while evaluating contrasting valuations and momentum profiles.
BlackRock has cemented its position as the world's preeminent asset manager, ending 2025 with a record $14 trillion in AUM and nearly $700 billion in full-year net inflows. The firm's iShares ETF franchise remains a dominant force, generating $527 billion in net inflows during 2025 alone. In recent weeks, BlackRock's stock has traded in a relatively narrow range around the $1,050–$1,100 level, reflecting a period of consolidation after a multi-year rally that saw the stock more than double from its 2022 lows. Full-year 2025 revenue reached approximately $24.9 billion, up 19% year-over-year, driven by market appreciation, organic base fee growth of 9%, and contributions from recent acquisitions. The company has been strategically reshaping its business toward higher-growth private markets, completing the acquisitions of Global Infrastructure Partners, Preqin (a leading private markets data provider), and HPS Investment Partners in a series of transactions totaling over $28 billion. These moves aim to position BlackRock for what CEO Larry Fink has described as the next phase of growth, targeting $400 billion in gross private markets fundraising by 2030. Q2 2026 earnings showed revenues of $5.42 billion with adjusted EPS (Earnings Per Share) of $12.05, comfortably beating consensus estimates, though the stock has been constrained by concerns about elevated expenses and integration costs from its acquisition spree.
State Street has emerged as one of the standout performers in the financial sector over the past year. The Boston-based custody and asset servicing giant has seen its stock surge approximately 74% over the trailing 12 months and roughly 44% year-to-date, dramatically outpacing both its peer group and the broader market. With $49 trillion in AUC/A and over $5 trillion in AUM through its State Street Global Advisors division, the firm occupies a critical position in the plumbing of global finance. Second-quarter 2025 results underscored the momentum: total fee revenue rose 11% year-over-year to $2.72 billion, while total revenue reached $3.45 billion, up 8%. Chairman and CEO Ron O'Hanley highlighted a sixth consecutive quarter of positive operating leverage (excluding notable items), record-high investment management AUM, and record FX (foreign exchange) trading client volumes. The firm also announced an 11% increase in its quarterly common stock dividend, supported by strong performance in the Federal Reserve's supervisory stress test, which reaffirmed the company's financial strength. State Street's ROTCE (Return on Tangible Common Equity) reached 17% in the second quarter, or 19% excluding notable items, signaling significant profitability improvements. The firm has also been deepening its alternatives capabilities through partnerships with firms like Apollo Global and Bridgewater Associates, positioning itself to capture growing institutional demand for private market strategies.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers traders and investors access to a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots, drawn from a broader universe of hundreds of automated strategies that trade thousands of different tickers. These bots employ diverse trading styles — from swing trading and trend following to scalping and pattern recognition — and operate across multiple timeframes, asset classes, and risk profiles. Only the bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in the Trending section, making it a dynamic snapshot of what AI-driven analysis identifies as the most compelling opportunities at any given time. Many featured bots showcase annualized returns in the double digits, with varying degrees of volatility and drawdown, reflecting the broad spectrum of strategies available. For those looking to explore how artificial intelligence navigates today's complex market landscape, the Trending AI Robots page serves as an informative starting point.
The most striking contrast between BLK and STT lies in their recent market performance and valuation profiles. State Street's stock has meaningfully outperformed BlackRock's across nearly every measurable timeframe — year-to-date, one-year, three-year, and five-year — driven by improving operating leverage, strong custody fee growth, and its recovery from historically discounted valuation levels. BlackRock, by contrast, has been digesting its transformative acquisition spree, with integration-related expenses and a higher share count (partly from equity-funded deals) weighing on near-term EPS growth despite robust revenue expansion. Business model differences are equally significant: BlackRock generates roughly 80% of its revenue from investment advisory and administration fees tied to AUM levels, making it highly sensitive to market valuations. State Street's revenue mix is more diversified, with custody and servicing fees providing a steadier base that is less dependent on market direction and more correlated with trading volumes, asset flows, and interest rates. On the growth front, BlackRock is betting heavily on private markets — an enormous addressable market where fee rates are 6 to 7 times higher than traditional index products. State Street's growth strategy is more incremental, focused on deepening its custody relationships, expanding its alternatives servicing capabilities, and improving operational efficiency. Risk factors also diverge: BLK faces integration risk from its large-scale acquisitions, while STT is more exposed to net interest income (NII) sensitivity in a changing rate environment — though recent stress test results provide reassurance on capital strength.
Based on observable factors — including trend consistency, relative momentum, and near-term catalyst clarity — Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely favor STT over BLK in the current environment. State Street's price trend has demonstrated greater consistency and upward momentum across multiple timeframes, supported by tangible operational improvements: six straight quarters of positive operating leverage, record investment management AUM, and a confident 11% dividend increase signal management conviction in the earnings trajectory. BlackRock's fundamental story remains compelling — $14 trillion in AUM and a growing private markets franchise are formidable competitive advantages — but the stock's recent price consolidation suggests the market is waiting for clearer evidence that the acquisition strategy will translate into sustained EPS acceleration. In probabilistic terms, STT currently exhibits a stronger combination of trend strength and fundamental tailwinds, though BLK's long-term positioning in private markets and ETF leadership means this relative assessment could shift as integration milestones are achieved and new growth vectors materialize.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 5 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.54% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.
BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2026.
STT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BLK | STT | BLK / STT | |
| Capitalization | 164B | 50.9B | 322% |
| EBITDA | 10.6B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.263 | 46.343 | -1% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.30 | 16.36 | 155% |
| Revenue | 25.6B | 14.5B | 177% |
| Total Cash | 13.1B | 6.52B | 201% |
| Total Debt | 15B | 29.2B | 51% |
BLK | STT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 5 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STT's Valuation (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (71) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (59) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.
STT's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (66) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (56) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.
STT's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BLK (56) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
| BLK | STT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 9 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.