BLK
Price
$974.22
Change
-$15.16 (-1.53%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
124.17B
48 days until earnings call
STT
Price
$98.70
Change
-$0.94 (-0.94%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
23.35B
48 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BLK vs STT

Header iconBLK vs STT Comparison
Open Charts BLK vs STTBanner chart's image
Blackrock
Price$974.22
Change-$15.16 (-1.53%)
Volume$1.25M
Capitalization124.17B
State Street
Price$98.70
Change-$0.94 (-0.94%)
Volume$1.81M
Capitalization23.35B
BLK vs STT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLK vs. STT commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a Hold and STT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (BLK: $989.38 vs. STT: $99.64)
Brand notoriety: BLK and STT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLK: 97% vs. STT: 99%
Market capitalization -- BLK: $124.17B vs. STT: $23.35B
BLK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $124.17B. STT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $23.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BLK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the long-term than BLK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • STT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the short-term than BLK.

Price Growth

BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.93% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLK is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

STT is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.70% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BLK($124B) has a higher market cap than STT($23.3B). BLK has higher P/E ratio than STT: BLK (22.65) vs STT (13.84). STT YTD gains are higher at: 2.310 vs. BLK (-3.485). BLK has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. STT (4.05B). BLK has less debt than STT: BLK (9.7B) vs STT (21.5B). BLK has higher revenues than STT: BLK (17.9B) vs STT (11.9B).
BLKSTTBLK / STT
Capitalization124B23.3B532%
EBITDA7.87BN/A-
Gain YTD-3.4852.310-151%
P/E Ratio22.6513.84164%
Revenue17.9B11.9B150%
Total Cash10.6B4.05B262%
Total Debt9.7B21.5B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLK vs STT: Fundamental Ratings
BLK
STT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8521
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2436
SMR RATING
1..100
558
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5023
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STT's Valuation (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (86) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as STT (36) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

STT's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (55) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BLK (50) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.

BLK's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as STT (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLKSTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BLK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEMY1.770.08
+4.73%
Femasys
NDAQ82.54-0.05
-0.06%
Nasdaq
BRDG8.07-0.11
-1.34%
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
STBA40.08-0.55
-1.35%
S&T Bancorp
SYM26.09-0.67
-2.50%
Symbotic

BLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been loosely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLK
1D Price
Change %
BLK100%
+0.31%
IVZ - BLK
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
BN - BLK
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
TROW - BLK
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
JHG - BLK
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
STT - BLK
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More

STT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STT
1D Price
Change %
STT100%
-0.17%
NTRS - STT
73%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
BK - STT
71%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
APAM - STT
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
PFG - STT
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
BLK - STT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
More