Advertisement
BLK vs TROW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? BlackRock (BLK) vs. T. Rowe Price (TROW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BlackRock (BLK), the world's largest asset manager with $13.89 trillion in assets under management (AUM), reported strong Q1 2026 results including $6.7 billion in revenue.
- T. Rowe Price (TROW) manages $1.71 trillion in AUM as of March 2026, focusing on active strategies amid ongoing net outflows.
- BLK stock has shown stronger recent momentum, with monthly gains around 5.8% and year-to-date return of 0.71%, compared to TROW's more modest YTD performance of 0.48%.
- Valuation contrast: TROW trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 10.97 versus BLK's 26.59, appealing to value investors.
- Both offer solid dividends around 2%, but BLK benefits from ETF inflows while TROW emphasizes retirement-focused assets.
- Market caps highlight scale: BLK at $164 billion dwarfs TROW's $22 billion.
Introduction
BlackRock (BLK) and T. Rowe Price (TROW) represent prominent players in the asset management industry, one leaning toward passive ETFs and technology-driven solutions, the other rooted in active mutual fund strategies. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to financial services amid shifting market dynamics, such as interest rate environments and flows into alternative assets. Traders monitoring relative performance may find insights into momentum, valuation trade-offs, and sector sentiment valuable for portfolio positioning in a competitive landscape.
BLK Overview and Recent Performance
BlackRock (BLK) is the global leader in asset management, overseeing $13.89 trillion in AUM as of Q1 2026 end, with significant growth in ETFs via its iShares platform and technology services like Aladdin. In recent market activity, the stock has exhibited upward momentum, rising about 5.8% over the past month and 16.7% over the last year, supported by robust Q1 2026 earnings featuring $6.7 billion in revenue and adjusted EPS of $12.53. Sentiment has been bolstered by record inflows into bitcoin ETFs and resilience despite a slight quarterly AUM dip from peak levels, reflecting strong positioning in high-growth areas like alternatives and retirement products.
TROW Overview and Recent Performance
T. Rowe Price (TROW) specializes in active management across equities, fixed income, and multi-asset strategies, with $1.71 trillion in AUM at March 2026 end, where retirement assets comprise 67%. Recent weeks have seen a rebound in share price, with one-month gains around 8% amid broader financial sector recovery, though year-to-date returns lag slightly at 0.48%. Performance reflects ongoing net outflows in some segments, offset by emphasis on dividend growth and fixed income expansion; AUM has hovered near $1.8 trillion recently, influenced by market volatility and client shifts toward passive alternatives.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots selected from over 351 total bots designed to trade thousands of tickers across diverse market conditions. These curated bots employ varied strategies, including signal agents for short-term trades, virtual agents for pattern recognition, and brokerage agents for automated execution, with timeframes from intraday to long-term holds. Performance highlights feature win rates often exceeding 60%, average returns in the double digits annually for top performers, and risk-adjusted metrics like Sharpe ratios above 1.5 in recent simulations. This selection adapts to current volatility, offering traders data-driven edges without emotional bias. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BlackRock (BLK) and T. Rowe Price (TROW) differ markedly in business models: BLK's scale-driven passive ETFs and tech platform contrast TROW's active, research-intensive approach, exposing the latter to higher fee pressures from outflows. Growth drivers favor BLK with 20% YoY AUM expansion versus TROW's stability amid redemptions. Recent momentum tilts to BLK's consistent gains, while TROW offers value via lower P/E and higher dividend appeal. Risk factors include BLK's concentration in equities and crypto exposure, against TROW's sensitivity to active underperformance. Sector exposure overlaps in financials, but sentiment leans positive for BLK on innovation catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward BLK over TROW, citing superior trend consistency, AUM growth stability, and ETF-driven catalysts amid recent market positioning. While TROW's valuation provides a margin of safety, BLK's relative strength suggests higher probability of outperformance in the near term, based on observable momentum and scale advantages.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLK is a StrongBuy and TROW is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTROW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BLK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TROW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TROW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TROW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while TROW (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLK is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
TROW is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-1.09% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BLK | TROW | BLK / TROW | |
| Capitalization | 158B | 23.2B | 681% |
| EBITDA | 10.6B | 3.17B | 334% |
| Gain YTD | -3.956 | 7.328 | -54% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.59 | 11.62 | 220% |
| Revenue | 25.6B | 7.41B | 346% |
| Total Cash | 13.1B | 3.73B | 351% |
| Total Debt | 15B | 438M | 3,425% |
BLK | TROW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 32 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 43 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BLK's Valuation (71) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as TROW (95). This means that BLK’s stock grew similarly to TROW’s over the last 12 months.
BLK's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TROW (100). This means that BLK’s stock grew somewhat faster than TROW’s over the last 12 months.
TROW's SMR Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (66). This means that TROW’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
TROW's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (56). This means that TROW’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
TROW's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BLK (47). This means that TROW’s stock grew similarly to BLK’s over the last 12 months.
| BLK | TROW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 54% |
Advertisement
BLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
TROW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TROW has been closely correlated with PFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TROW jumps, then PFG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TROW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TROW | 100% | +1.73% | ||
| PFG - TROW | 72% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| APAM - TROW | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| CG - TROW | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| BLK - TROW | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| IVZ - TROW | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.02% | ||
More | ||||