Advertisement
BLKC vs WULF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLKC is a Hold and WULF is a Hold.
WULF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BLKC | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSGDX | 17.00 | 0.11 | +0.65% |
| Transamerica Sustainable Growth Eq A | |||
| HGOVX | 81.46 | 0.29 | +0.36% |
| Hartford Growth Opportunities R6 | |||
| GCVTX | 24.41 | 0.07 | +0.29% |
| Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Inv | |||
| ASCLX | 13.47 | 0.02 | +0.15% |
| AB Select US Long/Short C | |||
| TASZX | 19.84 | -0.12 | -0.60% |
| Third Avenue Small Cap Value Z | |||
BLKC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLKC has been closely correlated with IREN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLKC jumps, then IREN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BLKC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLKC | 100% | -1.07% | ||
| IREN - BLKC | 73% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| WULF - BLKC | 71% Closely correlated | -2.82% | ||
| SBNY - BLKC | 68% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| BTDR - BLKC | 67% Closely correlated | -3.43% | ||
| CORZ - BLKC | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
WULF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WULF has been closely correlated with CIFR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WULF jumps, then CIFR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WULF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF | 100% | -2.82% | ||
| CIFR - WULF | 78% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| HUT - WULF | 77% Closely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| RIOT - WULF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| IREN - WULF | 76% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
| BITF - WULF | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||