BLMN
Price
$7.10
Change
-$0.04 (-0.56%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
605.04M
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EAT
Price
$153.79
Change
+$2.02 (+1.33%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
6.83B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BLMN vs EAT

Header iconBLMN vs EAT Comparison
Open Charts BLMN vs EATBanner chart's image
Bloomin' Brands
Price$7.10
Change-$0.04 (-0.56%)
Volume$978.39K
Capitalization605.04M
Brinker International
Price$153.79
Change+$2.02 (+1.33%)
Volume$744.68K
Capitalization6.83B
BLMN vs EAT Comparison Chart in %
BLMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BLMN vs. EAT commentary
Dec 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BLMN is a StrongBuy and EAT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 01, 2025
Stock price -- (BLMN: $7.10 vs. EAT: $153.79)
Brand notoriety: BLMN and EAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BLMN: 48% vs. EAT: 44%
Market capitalization -- BLMN: $605.04M vs. EAT: $6.83B
BLMN [@Restaurants] is valued at $605.04M. EAT’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $6.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BLMN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BLMN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the long-term than BLMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BLMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EAT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BLMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EAT is a better buy in the short-term than BLMN.

Price Growth

BLMN (@Restaurants) experienced а +11.81% price change this week, while EAT (@Restaurants) price change was +13.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BLMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

EAT is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.02% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EAT($6.83B) has a higher market cap than BLMN($605M). BLMN has higher P/E ratio than EAT: BLMN (19.19) vs EAT (15.94). EAT YTD gains are higher at: 16.252 vs. BLMN (-38.548). EAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 788M vs. BLMN (290M). BLMN has more cash in the bank: 50.3M vs. EAT (33.6M). EAT has less debt than BLMN: EAT (1.82B) vs BLMN (2.16B). EAT has higher revenues than BLMN: EAT (5.59B) vs BLMN (3.93B).
BLMNEATBLMN / EAT
Capitalization605M6.83B9%
EBITDA290M788M37%
Gain YTD-38.54816.252-237%
P/E Ratio19.1915.94120%
Revenue3.93B5.59B70%
Total Cash50.3M33.6M150%
Total Debt2.16B1.82B119%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BLMN vs EAT: Fundamental Ratings
BLMN
EAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10037
SMR RATING
1..100
8610
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
793
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BLMN's Valuation (4) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EAT (64). This means that BLMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLMN (100). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for BLMN (86). This means that EAT’s stock grew significantly faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

EAT's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLMN (76). This means that EAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BLMN’s over the last 12 months.

BLMN's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for EAT (93). This means that BLMN’s stock grew significantly faster than EAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLMNEAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BLMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GINUX32.250.29
+0.91%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts R6
OEGAX30.160.27
+0.90%
Invesco Discovery Mid Cap Growth A
GTSFX42.540.25
+0.59%
Invesco Small Cap Growth R6
CPAYX11.430.05
+0.44%
Integrity Dividend Summit C
HRCIX73.720.30
+0.41%
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec I