Ad is loading...
BMDPF
Price
$5.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
INTR
Price
$5.99
Change
+$0.02 (+0.34%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
120 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BMDPF vs INTR

Header iconBMDPF vs INTR Comparison
Open Charts BMDPF vs INTRBanner chart's image
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a
Price$5.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Inter & Co
Price$5.99
Change+$0.02 (+0.34%)
Volume$902.88K
CapitalizationN/A
BMDPF vs INTR Comparison Chart
Loading...
INTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMDPF vs. INTR commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDPF is a Hold and INTR is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BMDPF: $5.80 vs. INTR: $5.99)
Brand notoriety: BMDPF and INTR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMDPF: 11% vs. INTR: 71%
Market capitalization -- BMDPF: $301.01M vs. INTR: $2.51B
BMDPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $301.01M. INTR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMDPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINTR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMDPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INTR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the long-term than INTR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

INTR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • INTR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BMDPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.87% price change this week, while INTR (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTR is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INTR($2.51B) has a higher market cap than BMDPF($301M). INTR has higher P/E ratio than BMDPF: INTR (38.41) vs BMDPF (2.88). BMDPF YTD gains are higher at: 118.868 vs. INTR (8.338). INTR has less debt than BMDPF: INTR (7.68B) vs BMDPF (9.27B). INTR has higher revenues than BMDPF: INTR (4.44B) vs BMDPF (3.14B).
BMDPFINTRBMDPF / INTR
Capitalization301M2.51B12%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD118.8688.3381,426%
P/E Ratio2.8838.417%
Revenue3.14B4.44B71%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.27B7.68B121%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMDPF: Fundamental Ratings
BMDPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
INTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
INTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRKSX13.87-0.04
-0.29%
MFS Blended Research Em Mkts Eq R2
FGTAX25.58-0.23
-0.89%
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock A
NEWCX76.00-0.75
-0.98%
American Funds New World C
ESGMX20.46-0.33
-1.59%
Mirova Global Sustainable Equity A
GXXCX8.52-0.14
-1.62%
abrdn US Sustainable Leaders C

BMDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMDPF has been loosely correlated with PBLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMDPF jumps, then PBLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMDPF
1D Price
Change %
BMDPF100%
N/A
PBLOF - BMDPF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMERF - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBZ - BMDPF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRBF - BMDPF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTR - BMDPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

INTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTR has been loosely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTR jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTR
1D Price
Change %
INTR100%
+0.34%
ITUB - INTR
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
BSBR - INTR
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
NU - INTR
40%
Loosely correlated
-7.44%
BSAC - INTR
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
LYG - INTR
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
More