BMDPF
Price
$9.63
Change
-$0.09 (-0.93%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.97B
INTR
Price
$8.39
Change
+$0.18 (+2.19%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.69B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMDPF vs INTR

Header iconBMDPF vs INTR Comparison
Open Charts BMDPF vs INTRBanner chart's image
Banca Monte Dei Paschi S.p.a
Price$9.63
Change-$0.09 (-0.93%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization11.97B
Inter & Co
Price$8.39
Change+$0.18 (+2.19%)
Volume$3.41M
Capitalization3.69B
BMDPF vs INTR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMDPF vs. INTR commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMDPF is a Hold and INTR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BMDPF: $9.63 vs. INTR: $8.39)
Brand notoriety: BMDPF and INTR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMDPF: 165% vs. INTR: 135%
Market capitalization -- BMDPF: $11.97B vs. INTR: $3.69B
BMDPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.97B. INTR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMDPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileINTR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BMDPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • INTR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the long-term than INTR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMDPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMDPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INTR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BMDPF is a better buy in the short-term than INTR.

Price Growth

BMDPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.72% price change this week, while INTR (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

INTR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.00% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMDPF($12B) has a higher market cap than INTR($3.69B). INTR has higher P/E ratio than BMDPF: INTR (17.88) vs BMDPF (6.20). INTR YTD gains are higher at: 101.822 vs. BMDPF (58.583). BMDPF has less debt than INTR: BMDPF (10.2B) vs INTR (12.1B). INTR has higher revenues than BMDPF: INTR (7.36B) vs BMDPF (4.23B).
BMDPFINTRBMDPF / INTR
Capitalization12B3.69B325%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD58.583101.82258%
P/E Ratio6.2017.8835%
Revenue4.23B7.36B57%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.2B12.1B84%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMDPF: Fundamental Ratings
BMDPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMDPFINTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INTR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WCBR30.380.76
+2.58%
WisdomTree Cybersecurity ETF
RDTE33.970.30
+0.88%
Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTECovCllStgyETF
EGUS49.520.41
+0.83%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF
ROUS55.800.34
+0.61%
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
HYLB37.030.04
+0.11%
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corp Bd ETF

BMDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMDPF has been loosely correlated with PBLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMDPF jumps, then PBLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMDPF
1D Price
Change %
BMDPF100%
N/A
PBLOF - BMDPF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMERF - BMDPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBZ - BMDPF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
MTRBF - BMDPF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INTR - BMDPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
More

INTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTR has been loosely correlated with BSBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTR jumps, then BSBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INTR
1D Price
Change %
INTR100%
+2.19%
BSBR - INTR
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
ITUB - INTR
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
BBD - INTR
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
NU - INTR
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
BBDO - INTR
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More